Rep. Jim Jordan's speaker bid: Are Republicans damned either way?
Win or lose, Ohio congressman's quest for the gavel could backfire on the GOP in a big way


After days spent trying to whip Republican votes to support his uphill bid to become the next speaker of the House of Representatives, Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan this weekend made his case to the American public, claiming on X, formerly Twitter, that the nation "cannot afford us attacking each other." Chaos within the GOP caucus notwithstanding, Jordan insisted "the differences between Republicans and Democrats in the House far outweigh our differences in the Republican Conference."
Jordan's appeal to a sense of party unity is an understandable move for a man hoping to rein in — and reign over — a fractious GOP that's brought Washington to a virtual standstill. While exact Republican numbers are for now unclear, there are "upwards of 10 lawmakers firmly in the 'Never Jordan' camp" according to Punchbowl News. That's enough for Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart (R-Fla.) to predict to Roll Call that, with Jordan's math looking "not good," the party will ultimately have to find someone "who can truly unify us" — if such a figure within the GOP even exists.
For now, Jordan and his allies are intent on moving forward with a full floor vote for his speaker's bid to force wavering Republicans to go on the record one way or another. And herein lies a dilemma for the GOP: With each unsuccessful at-bat for an aspiring speaker, the party further affirms a sense of internal disorder and discord which undercuts their election-year pitch to voters that they should be trusted with governing. At the same time, if Jordan's gambit is successful and he does manage to flip enough naysayers to secure the speakership, some critics contend it could place the GOP in equally dire straits.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What the commentators said
Citing his support for former President Donald Trump's efforts to subvert the 2020 election, former Republican Rep. Liz Cheney — long one of Trump's most pointed
critics from the right — argued that selecting Jordan as their speaker nominee would mean Republicans are "abandoning the Constitution." Moreover, Cheney wrote on X, Republicans would ultimately "lose the House majority and they’ll deserve to."
Even Jordan supporters worry his camp's aggressive posturing to earn support within the caucus could end up damaging the party in the long term. The public pressure campaign to flip votes in his favor is "the dumbest way to support Jordan" Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas) told CNN's Jake Tapper this weekend. Highlighting his personal support for Jordan's bid, Crenshaw explained that the "dumbest thing you can do is to continue pissing off [potential supporters[ and entrench them" against Jordan. Sharing a message from an unidentified Fox News producer to pressure House Republicans to support Jordan, Axios' Juliegrace Brufke quoted one lawmaker who called the effort "counterproductive."
Moderates are growing increasingly irritated with the tactics Jordan allies are using to pressure them into voting for him, with one member noting the Hannity show has gotten involved in the efforts sending potential defectors the email below. One lawmaker said the push is… pic.twitter.com/ulOn0ZEbtsOctober 15, 2023
With Jordan's camp warning members of Congress that Trump will "exact revenge on those who don’t vote yes," Punchbowl pointed out that Jordan is explicitly tying the fate of his party's House caucus "with a presidential candidate as never before" in what is ultimately "a huge gamble."
Still, that gamble may ultimately pay off for Jordan, who has begun earning endorsements from some of "his most vocal opponents," Roll Call reported. The prospect that a "deal will have to be done," as voiced by Rep. Mike Turner (R-Ohio) on Face The Nation this weekend, was enough to send Rep. Ann Wagner (R-Mo.) into Jordan's camp, just one week after she'd denounced his "disgraceful, ungracious" speech upon losing the caucus' initial vote of support to Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.). Now, Wagner wrote on X, "too much is at stake to hand control of the House over to radical liberal Democrats."
What next?
All eyes are on Tuesday's expected floor vote, in which Jordan's "stick-and-carrot approach" will be put to the test, according to The Dispatch. Noting that the disruptions in the House have largely been the product of "hardliners, not the pragmatists, who have taken advantage of the personal power to individual members afforded by the GOP’s razor-thin majority," the outlet mused that it's not hard to imagine moderates using it to break Jordan's hard right conservative coalition this time around.
Meanwhile, absent a permanent speaker, some Democratic lawmakers have pushed forward an effort to "expand the Speaker Pro Tempore's authorities" for now, Axios reported.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Rafi Schwartz has worked as a politics writer at The Week since 2022, where he covers elections, Congress and the White House. He was previously a contributing writer with Mic focusing largely on politics, a senior writer with Splinter News, a staff writer for Fusion's news lab, and the managing editor of Heeb Magazine, a Jewish life and culture publication. Rafi's work has appeared in Rolling Stone, GOOD and The Forward, among others.
-
Cytomegalovirus can cause permanent birth defects
The Explainer The virus can show no symptoms in adults
-
Summer in Seattle: Outdoor dining like nowhere else
Feature Featuring a patio with a waterfront view, a beer garden, and more
-
Ari Aster revisits the pandemic, Adam Sandler tees off again and Lamb Chop gets an origin story in July movies
the week recommends The month's film releases include 'Eddington,' 'Happy Gilmore 2' and 'Shari & Lamb Chop'
-
'It's America that refuses to listen and learn'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
How will Trump's megabill affect you?
Today's Big Question Republicans have passed the 'big, beautiful bill' through Congress
-
How successful would Elon Musk's third party be?
Today's Big Question Musk has vowed to start a third party after falling out with Trump
-
Are masked ICE agents America's new secret police?
Today's Big Question Critics say masks undermine trust in law enforcement
-
Will NATO countries meet their new spending goal?
today's big question The cost of keeping Trump happy
-
Is Trump sidelining Congress' war powers?
Today's Big Question The Iran attack renews a long-running debate
-
How Zohran Mamdani's NYC mayoral run will change the Democratic Party
Talking Points The candidate poses a challenge to the party's 'dinosaur wing'
-
The ambiguous legal state of ectopic pregnancy care
The Explainer Rep. Kat Cammack's accusations of 'fearmongering' are the latest example of how mixed messages are complicating the debate around abortion