Tax plans spell trouble in the North Sea
Labour’s tax plans are whipping up a storm. Are the worries of opponents justified?
North Sea oil companies are "accustomed to political meddling", said The Times. But the new Government has made no bones of its desire to impose higher taxes and tougher environmental rules on producers in the forthcoming Budget – to tackle a regime that Environment Secretary Ed Miliband described before the election as having "more holes than Swiss cheese".
The next few months could prove "defining for Britain's oil and gas industry". Miliband has argued that revenue from windfall taxes could help finance Labour's much-vaunted £8bn GB Energy green investment vehicle, which will be headquartered in Scotland. But plenty of Scots are deeply concerned about a policy that threatens the local economy, said Ian McConnell in The Herald. Labour is charging into the sector "like a bull in a china shop". Ministers would "do well to exercise some caution".
On paper, the plans don't look too drastic. Labour aims to raise the windfall tax – introduced by Boris Johnson in 2022 as energy prices soared following the Ukraine invasion – from 75% to 78%, and scrap what ministers see as "unjustifiably generous" investment tax breaks. But according to industry body Offshore Energies UK, the move "will deal a £13bn blow to the economy", said John-Paul Ford Rojas on This is Money – jeopardising both UK growth and, ultimately, investment in the green economy if a "very short term" boost to tax revenues succeeds in throttling the North Sea tax goose. Around 35,000 jobs may be at risk.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Some firms are already retrenching, said Jasper Jolly in The Guardian: including Norwegian-owned Neo Energy, whose projects include the Buchan Horst oilfield off the Aberdeen coast, which was due to start production in 2027. Two more projects – the Rosebank and Jackdaw fields – are in doubt following Miliband's decision to not defend "against legal challenges" to their licences brought by environmentalist groups.
This is outrageous, said Matthew Lynn in The Daily Telegraph. Miliband has effectively "given Greenpeace control" over parts of our energy policy. What next? "Perhaps Greta Thunberg could be put in charge of the Bank of England." Of course, in an ideal world, "Britain could stop burning fossil fuels pronto and power the nation with windmills and sunbeams", said Alistair Osborne in The Times. But what if the Government's calculation that the UK can decarbonise electricity by 2030 turns out to be "wishful thinking", as many believe? If Keir Starmer is really serious about "enhancing our energy security", he might be well advised to "hedge his bets a bit" – and not go out of his way to kill off North Sea oil.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Will California's EV mandate survive Trump, SCOTUS challenge?
Today's Big Question The Golden State's climate goal faces big obstacles
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Underneath the noise, however, there’s an existential crisis'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
2024: the year of distrust in science
In the Spotlight Science and politics do not seem to mix
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
The future of X
Talking Point Trump's ascendancy is reviving the platform's coffers, whether or not a merger is on the cards
By The Week UK Published
-
The Democrats: time for wholesale reform?
Talking Point In the 'wreckage' of the election, the party must decide how to rebuild
By The Week UK Published
-
What will Trump mean for the Middle East?
Talking Point President-elect's 'pro-Israel stance' could mask a more complex and unpredictable approach to the region
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Netanyahu's gambit: axing his own defence minster
Talking Point Sacking of Yoav Gallant demonstrated 'utter contempt' for Israeli public
By The Week UK Published
-
Should Sonia Sotomayor retire from the Supreme Court?
Talking Points Democrats worry about repeating the history of Ruth Bader Ginsburg
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Meloni's migration solution: camps in Albania
Talking Point The controversial approach is potentially 'game-changing'
By The Week UK Published
-
US election: why can't Kamala Harris close the deal?
Talking Point For the vice-president to win 'we need less mulling and more action in a do-or-die moment'
By The Week UK Published
-
Hyperbole and hatred: can heated rhetoric kill?
Talking Point Hypocrisy and double standards are certainly rife, but the link between heated political language and real-world violence is unclear
By The Week UK Published