What will Trump mean for the Middle East?
President-elect's 'pro-Israel stance' could mask a more complex and unpredictable approach to the region

Israel is said to be "rushing to advance" a ceasefire deal in Lebanon in order to deliver an "early foreign policy win" for President-elect Donald Trump. "There is an understanding that Israel would gift something to Trump", an Israeli official told The Washington Post, after an Israeli minister met Donald Trump and Jared Kushner at Mar-a-Lago.
During his first presidency, Trump recognised "Jerusalem as the capital of Israel" and "Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights", wrote Middle East expert Amin Saikal on The Conversation. Trump "castigated Iran" and oversaw the signing of the Abraham Accords, which led to several Arab states normalising relations with Israel. But the Gaza and Lebanon wars, and skirmishing between Israel and Iran, have "changed the regional texture". With Arab populations "boiling over with frustration", the "transactional" Trump may struggle to strengthen America's "lucrative economic and trade ties" with Arab regimes.
'Penchant for unpredictability'
How Trump might "rearrange the chessboard" of the region is "still unclear", said Aaron Boxerman in The New York Times. The president-elect has "expressed broad support" for Israel's "right to defend itself", but he has also called on Benjamin Netanyahu to "finish up" the campaign. "I'm going to stop wars," Trump said in his victory speech. But the "isolationist forces" in the Republican party and his own "penchant for unpredictability" raise "a mountain of questions", said Tia Goldenberg for PBS News.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The Israeli government must "brace itself" for a future in which the new Trump administration could be "warm and supportive" but also "tight and tough" when that suits the US agenda, said a leader in The Jerusalem Post. "Ultimately", the Trump White House will "act in accordance with American interests, not Israel's".
Some feel an early hint of Trump's intentions was shown by his choice of Mike Huckabee as his nominee for US ambassador to Israel. Huckabee has been a "consistent supporter" of many Israelis' "ambitions to expand into territories that would form part of any future Palestinian state", wrote Joe Inwood for BBC News. The "right wing of Israeli politics" sees the Huckabee selection as "highly favourable" to their "longstanding aims". By contrast, Mustafa Barghouti, a West Bank-based Palestinian politician, said Huckabee has made statements "absolutely contradictory to international law", and that his appointment would be "really bad news for the cause of peace in this region".
'Nothing fundamental will change'
While some commentators weigh up whether Trump's second presidency will be better or worse for the Middle East, others believe it will make little difference to life on the ground. "Many observers" have predicted that Trump's new administration will be "far worse for Palestine and the Middle East" because of his "pro-Israel rhetoric" and "threats to bomb Iran", wrote Muhannad Ayyash for Al Jazeera. Yet a "closer look" at US foreign policy over the past eight years shows that "nothing fundamental will change for the Palestinian people and the region as a whole".
The Palestinian people have "spent generations" waiting for a US president "who would care enough to hold Israel accountable" and "to see our humanity", wrote Mohammed R. Mhawish for MSNBC. Yet each president "brushes off our reality". So, Trump's "brazen support" for Israel "isn't a deviation" but a "natural progression" of the way in which US presidents have "continually prioritised" geopolitical alliances over "Palestinian lives".
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Chas Newkey-Burden has been part of The Week Digital team for more than a decade and a journalist for 25 years, starting out on the irreverent football weekly 90 Minutes, before moving to lifestyle magazines Loaded and Attitude. He was a columnist for The Big Issue and landed a world exclusive with David Beckham that became the weekly magazine’s bestselling issue. He now writes regularly for The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Independent, Metro, FourFourTwo and the i new site. He is also the author of a number of non-fiction books.
-
King of Kings: 'excellent' book examines Iran's 1979 revolution and its global impacts
The Week Recommends Scott Anderson 'easily and elegantly' paints a picture of a century of Iran's history
-
Jaguar's Adrian Mardell steps down: a Maga mauling
Speed Read Jaguar Land Rover had come under fire for 'woke' advertising campaign
-
8 unsung islands to put on your travel list
The Week Recommends These destinations fly under the radar
-
Eighty years after Hiroshima: how close is nuclear conflict?
Today's Big Question Eight decades on from the first atomic bomb 'we have blundered into a new age of nuclear perils'
-
'Discriminating against DACA students'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Epstein: A boon for Democrats?
Feature Democrats' push to release the Epstein files splits the GOP, sending the House into an early summer recess
-
India rejects Trump threat over Russian oil
Speed Read The president said he would raise tariffs on India for buying and selling Russian oil
-
Tariffs: Is Trump winning his trade war?
Feature Trump secures a new trade deal as Europe agrees to 15% tariffs
-
ICE in the fields
Feature American agriculture relies on undocumented workers. What happens now that they're being deported?
-
'It feels less like advertising and more like brainwashing'
Instant Opinion
-
Will Trump privatize Social Security?
Today's Big Question Bessent calls savings program a 'back door' to privatization