Zoe: the personalised nutrition app giving doctors food for thought
Medical professionals say popular dietary monitors may lead to unnecessary health concerns

Experts are questioning whether Zoe, the personalised nutrition programme that has enjoyed a period of explosive growth, can back up its beneficial health claims.
Some British doctors have even suggested that Zoe – which promises to help users "reach a healthy weight", "feel less bloated" and "avoid chronic health issues" – could in fact lead to unnecessary health worries or even disordered eating.
The background
The Zoe programme, co-founded by Tim Spector, a genetic epidemiologist at King's College London, invites users to test, score and monitor how they respond to different foods.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A Zoe starter pack includes a faecal sampling kit, a finger-prick blood test and a continuous glucose monitor (CGM). With these at-home tests Zoe "can tell you how your body handles fats, sugars (carbohydrates break down into glucose) and analyse the precise make-up of your gut microbiome", said The Times's Giulia Crouch, who tested the programme.
This data, along with questionnaires about your diet and lifestyle, is then processed by AI to give you a "score out of 100 (100 being the best) for your fat control, glucose control and the health of your gut microbiome", Crouch explained.
The latest
The app, which is endorsed by the likes of Davina McCall and Carrie Johnson, has been immensely popular. More than 100,000 subscribers have joined, each paying £299.99 for the test and another £300 for a 12-month plan. And there are 300,000 people on the waiting list.
McCall has claimed that with the help of the app she is now "living her best life", telling prospective consumers, and her 1.7 million Instagram followers, that the knowledge provided by the technology is the "greatest gift ever".
But, said Deborah Cohen and Margaret McCartney on UnHerd, while Zoe "boasts all the hallmarks of a scientific endeavour", its "scientific foundations aren't as strong as they would have you think".
Cohen and McCartney asked "the key question: is there evidence that the individualised advice generated by the ZOE tests, which is the key market differentiator, does what it claims?
"The answer: we don't know." No trials have yet been published to show whether Zoe's advice "can result in better health outcomes compared with standard diet and lifestyle advice".
And despite its claims – and those of similar programmes – some doctors remain "ambivalent" to the potential benefits, said Wired. They have reported that some perfectly healthy patients have come to see them due to concerns over the readings they have been given in their Zoe app.
The reaction
Shivani Misra, a consultant doctor specialising in diabetes in London, told Wired she has seen an increase in the number of patients at her non-NHS practice concerned that they may be at risk of developing diabetes. They have "either purchased a CGM themselves or through the Zoe program" and are reporting either regularly high blood sugar levels or sharp rises and falls.
CGMs are "set up to derive those kinds of behaviours in exactly the people that would be susceptible to it, in my opinion," Misra told the magazine. "I personally think there is some corporate responsibility to make sure that there is adequate safety in place for people."
Zoe is "part of a study into what healthy postprandial blood glucose levels actually are", said Isabel Hardman in The Spectator. And in it "lies the flaw in all the popular obsession with blood glucose spikes: no one yet knows what 'healthy' looks like for non-diabetics".
Monitoring your own blood sugar or metabolism "might be interesting", but "it's not necessarily important or useful", Hardman said.
The effects
Nicola Guess, a dietician and researcher at the University of Oxford, told Wired that the main problem with CGMs is that they are changing people's relationships with what they eat. "It's just making them quite weird about food, and it takes a lot of the enjoyment out of food for no reason whatsoever," said Guess.
Not so, said Tom Parker Bowles, who tested the Zoe programme for the Mail on Sunday's You magazine. The Zoe diet is "plain common sense", which encourages participants to "eat more legumes, avoid ultra-processed foods, and eat more fermented stuff: sauerkraut, kimchi and yogurt". All of this is just "sensible, rational and pragmatic" advice, which "has not only made me look more closely at what I stuff in my gob", Parker Bowles said.
Yet advice like this doesn't need to be so convoluted, said Hardman in The Spectator. This kind of technology is popular because it "helps people feel more in control of their lives and their health", but it also "overcomplicates what can be perfectly simple".
"You don't need to shell out hundreds of pounds to know that eating more fruit and vegetables will improve your health," Hardman concluded. "And you definitely don't need a flashy accessory to tell you that your body is, in fact, boringly healthy."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Arion McNicoll is a freelance writer at The Week Digital and was previously the UK website’s editor. He has also held senior editorial roles at CNN, The Times and The Sunday Times. Along with his writing work, he co-hosts “Today in History with The Retrospectors”, Rethink Audio’s flagship daily podcast, and is a regular panellist (and occasional stand-in host) on “The Week Unwrapped”. He is also a judge for The Publisher Podcast Awards.
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Crossword: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sudoku medium: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
Life after space: how will Nasa's stranded astronauts cope?
In the Spotlight Sunita 'Suni' Williams and Barry 'Butch' Wilmore are headed back to Earth after nine months on the ISS – but their greatest challenge may still lie ahead
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Scientists report optimal method to boil an egg
Speed Read It takes two temperatures of water to achieve and no fancy gadgets
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Humans are near peak life expectancy, study finds
Speed Read Unless there is a transformative breakthrough in medical science, people on average will reach the age of 87
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The pros and cons of GMOs
Pros and Cons The modified crops are causing controversy
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Finger-prickin' good: Are simpler blood tests seeing new life years after Theranos' demise?
Today's Big Question One Texas company is working to bring these tests back into the mainstream
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
The fight to save the world's most famous cheeses
Under the Radar Reliance on exhausted fungal strains threatens the future of a host of blue cheeses
By Rebecca Messina, The Week UK Published
-
Universal donor blood is 'close' to reality
Under the Radar Scientists identify 'cocktail' of enzymes that destroy harmful antigens
By Rebecca Messina, The Week UK Published
-
Scientists create 'meaty' rice for eco-friendly protein
Speed Read Korean scientists have invented a new hybrid food, consisting of beef muscle and fat cells grown inside grains of rice
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published