How police footage will help Facebook target mass shooter live streams
Social media giant moves to curb extremist content following anger over Christchurch shootings videos
Facebook is to use footage from police body cameras to train its content moderation programmes in response to claims that it failed to prevent images of the New Zealand mosque shootings spreading across its platform earlier this year.
The social media giant will provide London’s Metropolitan Police with body cameras “for firearms training exercises”, the Financial Times reports. It also plans to supply US law enforcement agencies with wearable cameras.
Images captured by the cameras will then be used to train artificial intelligence (AI) powered content moderation systems to more quickly identify and remove first-person footage of real-life shooting incidents, the FT adds.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The agreement is the latest move by Facebook to limit extreme content on its platform. In May, the company employed a “one-strike policy”, where users sharing violent content - such as a statement from an extremist group “without context” - would be blocked from using Facebook Live, says Sky News.
Why Facebook was criticised for its handling of the New Zealand shootings
On 15 March, 51 people were killed when a “lone attacker opened fire during Friday prayers” at two mosques in Chirstchurch, The Sun says.
The gunman live-streamed the attack for 17 minutes through Facebook, where the footage remained for a further 12 minutes before being taken down, says Sky News. Some 200 people watched the stream live, though 1.5 million videos of the attack were uploaded and subsequently removed.
Facebook was criticised for failing to identify the stream and for leaving footage of the attack on its platform “weeks” after the event, according to Engadget.
How police footage could prevent future violent live-streams
In its defence, Facebook said in a statement that its moderation algorithms “did not have enough content depicting first-person footage of violent events to effectively train our machine learning technology.
“That’s why we’re working with government and law enforcement officials in the US and UK to obtain camera footage from their firearms training programs – providing a valuable source of data to train our systems.”
The Met Police’s assistant commissioner for specialist operations, Neil Basu, believes that Facebook’s cameras may also benefit police “in their response to such incidents”, The Daily Telegraph reports.
The footage recorded by the Met will also be distributed through the Home Office to other tech firms developing software aimed at identifying mass shootings broadcast on social media, the newspaper adds.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
People of the year 2024
In the Spotlight Remember the people who hit the headlines this year?
By The Week UK Published
-
The Christmas quiz 2024
From the magazine Test your grasp of current affairs and general knowledge with our quiz
By The Week UK Published
-
Crossword: December 25, 2024
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
Bluesky: the social media platform causing a mass X-odus
The Explainer Social media platform is enjoying a new influx but can it usurp big rivals?
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Australia proposes social media ban before age 16
Speed Read Australia proposes social media ban before age 16
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Social media ban: will Australia's new age-based rules actually work?
Talking Point PM Anthony Albanese's world-first proposal would bar children under 16 even if they have parental consent, but experts warn that plan would be ineffective and potentially exacerbate dangers
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
States sue TikTok over children's mental health
Speed Read The lawsuit was filed by 13 states and Washington, D.C.
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
The 'loyalty testers' who can check a partner's fidelity
Under The Radar The history of 'honey-trapping goes back a long way'
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Elon Musk's X blinks in standoff with Brazil
Speed Read Brazil may allow X to resume operations in the country, as Musk's company agrees to comply with court demand
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Threads turns one: where does the Twitter rival stand?
In the Spotlight Although Threads is reporting 175 million active monthly users, it has failed to eclipse X as a meaningful cultural force
By Keumars Afifi-Sabet, The Week UK Published
-
The growing dystopian AI influencer economy
In the Spotlight AI-generated digital personas are giving human influencers a run for their money
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published