Abortion was never a settled issue in America, whatever SCOTUS rulings say
The early reviews of oral arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization before the Supreme Court on Wednesday were full of hopes and fears that Roe v. Wade (1973) is hanging by a thread. It remains to be seen whether this is actually true, but that precedent for legal abortion has long rested on a foundation of dubious history, constitutional reasoning and science.
In the almost half-century since Roe, we've watched the case for a permissive abortion policy gradually shift from the right to privacy (Roe) to an expansive view of personal autonomy (1992's Planned Parenthood v. Casey) to equality today. But these legal justifications have only a tangential relationship to the real-world arguments over abortion Americans are having.
Abortion has remained a hotly debated issue despite decades of the Supreme Court declaring the matter settled precisely because there is considerable truth to the core observations made by each side: Abortion constitutes the taking of a unique human being's life, and carrying a pregnancy to term — much less an unwanted pregnancy — is a major imposition on the bodily integrity of a woman.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What is much less rooted in truth is our society's post-Roe pretense that the organism growing in the womb is a baby if the parents want her and something closer to an expendable blob of tissue if they don't. The circumstances of pregnancy may vary widely, from joyful to tragic, but the nature of the being inside the womb does not. For this reason, many of the subsidiary arguments for abortion are shrouded in humanity-denying deception and euphemism.
Most of us know deep down that once a woman is pregnant, she already has a child. The choice then becomes whether it is a live child or a dead child. And whatever the Supreme Court rules, we should seek to create a society that offers women a better choice than a dead child.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
W. James Antle III is the politics editor of the Washington Examiner, the former editor of The American Conservative, and author of Devouring Freedom: Can Big Government Ever Be Stopped?.
-
Political cartoons for January 17Cartoons Saturday’s political cartoons include hard hats, compliance, and more
-
Ultimate pasta alla NormaThe Week Recommends White miso and eggplant enrich the flavour of this classic pasta dish
-
Death in Minneapolis: a shooting dividing the USIn the Spotlight Federal response to Renee Good’s shooting suggest priority is ‘vilifying Trump’s perceived enemies rather than informing the public’
-
Why Greenland’s natural resources are nearly impossible to mineThe Explainer The country’s natural landscape makes the task extremely difficult
-
Iran cuts internet as protests escalateSpeed Reada Government buildings across the country have been set on fire
-
US nabs ‘shadow’ tanker claimed by RussiaSpeed Read The ship was one of two vessels seized by the US military
-
How Bulgaria’s government fell amid mass protestsThe Explainer The country’s prime minister resigned as part of the fallout
-
Femicide: Italy’s newest crimeThe Explainer Landmark law to criminalise murder of a woman as an ‘act of hatred’ or ‘subjugation’ but critics say Italy is still deeply patriarchal
-
Brazil’s Bolsonaro behind bars after appeals run outSpeed Read He will serve 27 years in prison
-
Americans traveling abroad face renewed criticism in the Trump eraThe Explainer Some of Trump’s behavior has Americans being questioned
-
Nigeria confused by Trump invasion threatSpeed Read Trump has claimed the country is persecuting Christians
