Bad blood: how haemophiliacs were infected with HIV
As many as 2,000 British haemophiliacs died after being given tainted blood plasma in the 1970s and 80s
A public inquiry into a contaminated blood scandal which is believed to have led to the deaths of more than 2,000 British haemophiliacs over the past 30 years has finally got underway.
Described by Theresa May as “a tragedy that should never have happened”, it has been labelled the worst treatment scandal in the history of the NHS. The PM said it has “caused unimaginable pain and hurt for victims and their families for decades”.
What prompted the inquiry?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
About 4,800 people with haemophilia were accidentally infected with hepatitis C or HIV in the 1970s and 1980s.
The cases can be traced back to the use of a new “wonder drug” made from the pooled blood plasma of tens of thousands of donors to help treat the rare condition, which prevents blood from clotting properly.
During this period, the NHS imported Factor 8 from the US, where only later was it revealed that high-risk groups like prisoners had been paid to give blood.
The Daily Telegraph says “two previous inquiries have been branded a whitewash by campaigners”.
What happened to those given Factor 8?
In 2015, a parliamentary report found that about 7,500 patients had been infected by blood products. Of those, some 1,200 were infected with HIV, including many young children of primary school age. Only 250 are still alive today.
An even greater number are believed to have contracted hepatitis C, which affects more than 150 million people around the world, and can lead to liver failure and cancer.
Since the inquiry was announced in July 2017, campaign groups estimate that more than 150 infected haemophiliacs have died, raising the total number of fatalities to more than 2,400.
What are they hoping to find out?
The first day of the inquiry, which is expected to last up to three years, “was packed with victims and bereaved relatives” reports The Guardian. “Many wore black, red and yellow ties – black in memory of those who have died, red for HIV and yellow for hepatitis C. There were rounds of applause as the judge and witnesses spoke.”
However, the first day also led to controversary, after the government announced it will set aside less than £30m to compensate victims.
Campaign groups have responded angrily to what they say is a “derisory offer” and an “attempt to overshadow an important day for the victims”.
A total of £75m has now been set aside for financial support for those in England affected by the scandal, but Jason Evans, founder of the Factor 8 campaign group, said the new offer from the government would equate to less than £900 per person.
He said the government had failed to take responsibility for the scandal.
“Victims and relatives want to know why warnings about the safety of the medicine may have been ignored,” the BBC reports, “why plans to make the UK self-sufficient in blood products were scrapped, and why many documents and patient records appear to have been lost or destroyed”.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Magazine solutions - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published
-
Magazine printables - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published
-
Why ghost guns are so easy to make — and so dangerous
The Explainer Untraceable, DIY firearms are a growing public health and safety hazard
By David Faris Published
-
Should blood donors be paid?
The Explainer Financial rewards would help fill NHS shortfall but bring risk of contamination and exploitation, WHO warns
By The Week UK Published
-
UK gynaecological care crisis: why thousands of women are left in pain
The Explainer Waiting times have tripled over the past decade thanks to lack of prioritisation or funding for women's health
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
A 'transformative' gene therapy for haemophilia B
The Explainer Costly treatment that could be 'truly life-changing' for patients with rare blood disorder gets funding boost
By Julia O'Driscoll, The Week UK Published
-
Infected blood scandal: will justice be served?
Today's Big Question Government apologises for 'decades-long moral failure' and promises £10bn compensation but true accountability may take far longer
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Immunotherapy and hay fever
The Explainer Research shows that the treatment could provide significant relief from symptoms for many hay fever sufferers
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
The pros and cons of universal health care
Pros and Cons A medical system that serves everyone comes with its own costs, and they're not only financial
By Rebecca Messina, The Week UK Last updated
-
Martha's Rule: patients given right to urgent second opinion
The Explainer Hospitals in England will launch new scheme that will allow access to a rapid treatment review
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
The contaminated blood scandal
The Explainer Widely regarded as the worst treatment disaster in the history of the NHS, the public inquiry is due to publish its report in May
By The Week UK Published