Why are rising sea levels so dangerous?
New study finds that rising tides could displace hundreds of millions of people
Rising sea levels could have “profound consequences” for the planet, scientists have warned.
It has long been believed that the world's oceans would rise by a maximum of just under a metre by the year 2100. However, a new study published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences forecasts that the real level may be around double that figure, due to accelerated melting in Greenland and Antarctica.
The latest research, carried out by a team of international climate academics, says such a scenario could lead to the displacement of hundreds of millions of people. “To put this into perspective, the Syrian refugee crisis resulted in about a million refugees coming into Europe,” said Professor Jonathan Bamber, one of the authors of the study.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“That is about 200 times smaller than the number of people who would be displaced in a 2m sea-level rise.”
The report says the world would lose an area of land equal to 1.79m square kilometres - equivalent to the size of Libya - with much of the erasure affecting important food growing areas.
The Daily Mail says the scenario would “wipe out over a million square miles of farming and other food producing lands,” while Metro says that the outcome of the predicted changes would be “catastrophic”.
Major cities, including London, New York and Shanghai would be under threat and huge areas of Bangladesh would become simply uninhabitable.
The researchers believe that if emissions continue on the current path then the world's seas could rise as much as 238cm by 2100. Although this would be a worst-case environmental scenarios, they believe it is a prospect worth taking seriously.
Acknowledging the chances of this are around 5%, Bamber said: “If I said to you that there was a one in 20 chance that if you crossed the road you would be squashed you wouldn't go near it.
“Even a 1% probability means that a one in a hundred year flood is something that could happen in your lifetime. I think that a 5% probability, crikey - I think that's a serious risk.”
The study suggests that there is still time to avoid this catastrophe, but only if there are major cuts in emissions across the planet.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Magazine solutions - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published
-
Magazine printables - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published
-
Why ghost guns are so easy to make — and so dangerous
The Explainer Untraceable, DIY firearms are a growing public health and safety hazard
By David Faris Published
-
Why Assad fell so fast
The Explainer The newly liberated Syria is in an incredibly precarious position, but it's too soon to succumb to defeatist gloom
By The Week UK Published
-
Romania's election rerun
The Explainer Shock result of presidential election has been annulled following allegations of Russian interference
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Russia's shadow war in Europe
Talking Point Steering clear of open conflict, Moscow is slowly ratcheting up the pressure on Nato rivals to see what it can get away with.
By The Week UK Published
-
Cutting cables: the war being waged under the sea
In the Spotlight Two undersea cables were cut in the Baltic sea, sparking concern for the global network
By The Week UK Published
-
The nuclear threat: is Vladimir Putin bluffing?
Talking Point Kremlin's newest ballistic missile has some worried for Nato nations
By The Week UK Published
-
Russia vows retaliation for Ukrainian missile strikes
Speed Read Ukraine's forces have been using U.S.-supplied, long-range ATCMS missiles to hit Russia
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
Has the Taliban banned women from speaking?
Today's Big Question 'Rambling' message about 'bizarre' restriction joins series of recent decrees that amount to silencing of Afghanistan's women
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Cuba's energy crisis
The Explainer Already beset by a host of issues, the island nation is struggling with nationwide blackouts
By Rebekah Evans, The Week UK Published