Facebook will pay $5bn fine over privacy violations
It is the largest fine the FTC has ever levied, and includes commitments from Facebook on its privacy practices, but does it go far enough?
The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has reached a $5bn settlement with Facebook Inc over its year-long investigation into allegations of widespread mistreatment of consumer data.
The settlement, announced on Wednesday, commits the social media behemoth to restructuring its approach to users’ privacy, and setting up tools to allow the FTC to monitor its practices. The penalty is the largest privacy fine in history, but is also equivalent to around the amount Facebook makes in a month.
“Despite repeated promises to its billions of users worldwide that they could control how their personal information is shared, Facebook undermined consumers’ choices,” said FTC chairman Joe Simons.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The news comes against a backdrop of increased concerns in Washington, and with governments internationally, around the vast power accumulated by powerful tech companies. Facebook’s share price dropped roughly 1% early on Wednesday.
As The Daily Telegraph reports, “The fine against Facebook comes one day after the US Department of Justice opened an investigation into whether companies such as Facebook, Amazon and Google 'stifled innovation' by thwarting competition unlawfully.”
Facebook doesn’t admit any wrongdoing, but has said it will pay the fine.
The settlement divided the FTC, which is comprised of five members - two Democrats and three Republicans - along party lines. Republicans championed the agreement, while Democrats deemed it insufficiently punitive.
The Washington Post reports that the FTC was split over issues such as the culpability of Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg. Despite the Democratic members’ belief “that corporate leaders should be held personally accountable for their companies’ repeated privacy mishaps”, Facebook “steadfastly opposed placing Zuckerberg under order”, says the newspaper.
The settlement was reached on the proviso that Zuckerberg would avoid direct liability.
Nevertheless, according to Reuters, “under the… settlement, Facebook’s board will create an independent privacy committee that removes ‘unfettered control by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg over decisions affecting user privacy.’”
“Mark Zuckerberg, chief executive, and the privacy officers will be required to certify that the company is in compliance with Facebook’s privacy programme on a quarterly basis,” the Financial Times reports.
The FTC said: “Any false certification will subject them to individual civil and criminal penalties.”
Democrat commissioners also believed the fine should have been higher.
The agency probe focused specifically on whether Facebook violated a previous 2011 privacy settlement. According to the Associated Press, the investigation was opened “last year after revelations that data mining firm Cambridge Analytica had gathered details on as many as 87 million Facebook users without their permission”.
FTC chairman Simons said in a statement that the measures “will provide significant deterrence not just to Facebook, but to every other company that collects or uses consumer data”.
The New York Times suggests that Democrat commissioner Rohit Chopra dissagreed, quoting him as saying: “When companies can violate the law, pay big penalties and still turn a profit while keeping their business model intact, enforcement agencies cannot claim victory.”
Zuckerberg posted on his Facebook page: “We have a responsibility to protect people’s privacy. We already work hard to live up to this responsibility, but now we’re going to set a completely new standard for our industry.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
William Gritten is a London-born, New York-based strategist and writer focusing on politics and international affairs.
-
Two ancient cities have been discovered along the Silk Road
Under the radar The discovery changed what was known about the old trade route
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
'People shouldn't have to share the road with impaired drivers'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Is academic freedom in peril?
Today's Big Question Faculty punishments are on the rise
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Is the AI bubble deflating?
Today's Big Question Growing skepticism and high costs prompt reconsideration
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
How social media is limiting political content
The Explainer Critics say Meta's 'extraordinary move' to have less politics in users' feeds could be 'actively muzzling civic action'
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Twitter's year of Elon Musk: what happens next?
Why Everyone's Talking About 'Your platform is dying', says one commentator, but new CEO is aiming for profitability next year
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Turns out Facebook isn't as polarizing as previously thought
Talking Point New studies show that, contrary to prior belief, the algorithm has little effect on driving polarization
By Theara Coleman Published
-
Threads: will privacy fears scupper Meta’s Twitter ‘killer’?
Under the Radar Mark Zuckerberg’s new Threads app has launched but data protection rules mean it isn’t yet available in the EU
By Keumars Afifi-Sabet Published
-
Mark Zuckerberg vs. Elon Musk: a tale of the tech tape
Under the Radar The two men challenged each other to a fight after years of sniping
By Justin Klawans Published
-
How greater online regulation is prompting fears of a ‘splinternet’
feature Government pressure worldwide means the internet is not as open as it once was
By Sorcha Bradley Published
-
Donald Trump, the Pope and the disruptive power of AI images
feature AI-generated deepfakes blur reality and could be used for political disinformation or personal blackmail
By The Week Staff Published