The cost of renationalisation
Business lobby accused of ‘telling lies’ over Labour’s nationalisation plans
The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) has admitted exaggerating the “eye-watering” £196bn price tag that it put on Labour’s nationalisation plans.
After publicly denouncing the party’s plans as a “waste of time, energy and public money”, the business lobby group acknowledged in private communications that its analysis did not reflect the party’s policies.
In an email exchange seen by The Guardian, the CBI’s principal economist told Labour officials that they recognised some of their costings did not relate to “official Labour policy”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Referring to the incorrect conjecture that Labour would buy the rail industry’s rolling stock, the economist said: “We have assumed the rolling stock would be bought into public ownership as the trains are currently owned by the private sector and therefore full-scale nationalisation of rail would require this.
“However, we recognise that this isn’t official Labour policy on nationalising the rail industry.”
The CBI, which represents around 190,000 UK businesses, had said that the cost of taking public services into state control would be equivalent of all income tax paid by UK citizens in a year, said the BBC. And national debt would stand to rise by 10.7% as a result, the group claimed.
However, while now acknowledging the error over the railway rolling stock, the CBI is refusing to detail the exact costs that make up its calculations.
“Unfortunately, we are unable to provide a breakdown of the £196bn figure as our members do not feel comfortable doing this,” said the economist in the leaked email exchange.
Labour’s shadow transport secretary, Andy McDonald, told The Guardian that the CBI had based its costings on “fabricated false information” and the group didn’t “have the guts to publish their figures”.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
For more political analysis - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Get your first six issues free
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
What does Labour want to renationalise?
Labour wants to take water and energy utilities, train firms and the Royal Mail into public ownership.
The CBI based their calculations on renationalising Royal Mail, the national grid, and 16 water companies, nine of which also deal with sewerage.
They also assumed that railway vehicles would be brought into public ownership, but Labour says this is not part of its plan.
Responding to the criticism over its projections, the group said: “The CBI stands behind its analysis of Labour’s plans for large-scale renationalisation.
“The cost of purchasing rolling stock is a fraction of the £196bn and was included as that is what full-scale renationalisation of the rail industry would likely involve. If a Labour government chose not to purchase the rolling stock, they would still need to pay the cost of leasing them.”
So how much would the buybacks cost?
The CBI puts the cost of renationalising these major utilities at a minimum of £196bn - which would take the UK national debt to levels not seen since the 1960s, at 94% of GDP.
The group points out that this upfront cost is almost as high as the combined £141bn health budget and £61bn spent on education.
“The price tag for Labour’s renationalisation plans is beyond eye-watering,” said the CBI’s chief economist, Rain Newton-Smith.
She continued: “There are so many other genuine priorities for public spending right now, from investing in our young people to the transition to low carbon economy and connecting our cities and communities.
“These issues are what keep businesses up at night and what they want to see the government get on with addressing. Nationalisation would waste time, energy and public money.”
However, the Institute for Fiscal Studies last week said that focusing on the upfront cost of taking utilities into public ownership was the wrong approach. “Economically what matters is whether these assets would be better managed by the public or the private sector,” the independent research organisation argues.
What has Labour said?
Labour has accused the CBI of making a series of arbitrary, exaggerated and misguided assumptions, says The Guardian.
The lobby group applied a 30% premium to the asset values of private firms, but Labour has dismissed the resulting figures as unrealistic.
Shadow chancellor John McDonnell has previously said that Parliament would decide what the state paid to renationalise assets. He also said that such a move would ultimately cost the public nothing, because ownership of assets would save money.
Responding to the CBI report, Labour pointed to the popularity of the proposed measures among British people.
A party spokesperson said: “It is disappointing that the CBI seems incapable of having a grown-up conversation about public ownership - which is hugely popular, and common across Europe.
“It sadly reveals that they are more interested in protecting shareholders than in creating a fair economy.”
Following the revelation that the CBI exaggerated the £196bn figure, shadow transport secretary Mcdonald added: “The CBI’s shoddy research and shabby conduct does a great disservice to our political debate during the hugely challenging times through which we now live.
“At the very least, I would expect an apology from [CBI director-general] Carolyn Fairbairn over the distorted misrepresentations her organisation has sought to peddle.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Geoff Capes obituary: shot-putter who became the World’s Strongest Man
In the Spotlight The 'mighty figure' was a two-time Commonwealth Champion and world-record holder
By The Week UK Published
-
Israel attacks Iran: a 'limited' retaliation
Talking Point Iran's humiliated leaders must decide how to respond to Netanyahu's measured strike
By The Week UK Published
-
Crossword: November 2, 2024
The Week's daily crossword puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
What is the next Tory leader up against?
Today's Big Question Kemi Badenoch or Robert Jenrick will have to unify warring factions and win back disillusioned voters – without alienating the centre ground
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Labour risking the 'special relationship'?
Today's Big Question Keir Starmer forced to deny Donald Trump's formal complaint that Labour staffers are 'interfering' to help Harris campaign
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is Lammy hoping to achieve in China?
Today's Big Question Foreign secretary heads to Beijing as Labour seeks cooperation on global challenges and courts opportunities for trade and investment
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Men in Gray suits: why the plots against Starmer's top adviser?
Today's Big Question Increasingly damaging leaks about Sue Gray reflect 'bitter acrimony' over her role and power struggle in new government
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Britain about to 'boil over'?
Today's Big Question A message shared across far-right groups listed more than 30 potential targets for violence in the UK today
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
UK's Starmer slams 'far-right thuggery' at riots
Speed Read The anti-immigrant violence was spurred by false rumors that the suspect in the Southport knife attack was an immigrant
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The Tamils stranded on 'secretive' British island in Indian Ocean
Under the Radar Migrants 'unlawfully detained' since 2021 shipwreck on UK-controlled Diego Garcia, site of important US military base
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published