The Labour leader contenders set out their stalls on a special edition of Newsnight last night ahead of the impending membership vote.
Lisa Nandy, Keir Starmer, Rebecca Long-Bailey and Emily Thornberry are all competing to replace Jeremy Corbyn. The winning candidate will have to try to bring the party back from a historically bad election result and restore a reputation damaged by accusations of anti-Semitism.
The Guardian says all the candidates have adopted at least part of the 2019 manifesto, so policy differences between them have been “relatively modest” so far. Instead, they have sought to differentiate themselves on matters of “internal party democracy”.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Nandy, Starmer and Long-Bailey are all guaranteed spots on the ballot paper when the vote by Labour members opens on 21 February. Thornberry still has to secure 33 Constituency Labour Party nominations.
Anti-Semitism
The issue that has overshadowed much of Corbyn’s leadership also dominated last night’s debate. According to the BBC, Thornberry landed a much-needed “zinger” when she criticised Long-Bailey’s track record on tackling anti-Semitism, while the Guardian calls it “some of the liveliest exchanges”.
Thornberry said she had “regularly called out anti-Semitism” in Labour and added that, in the shadow cabinet, she and Starmer had asked for “regular reports” on the issue. Asked if Long-Bailey had done the same, Thornberry said: “No, I don’t think Rebecca did.”
Long-Bailey replied: “I did, I think you’ll find.” Thornberry replied, sharply: “Sorry, I don’t remember.”
All four candidates said they would challenge anti-Semitism in the party, apologised for it and agreed they would sign up to the ten pledges proposed by the Board of Deputies of British Jews to tackle racism.
Starmer, seen as the key Remain candidate, was at pains to deny that he had been the architect of Labour’s Brexit policy. Corbyn’s pledge to hold a second referendum on EU membership, in which Labour would stay neutral, has been damned by his critics as falling flat with voters fed up with the issue.
Starmer was forced on the defensive last night, insisting other members of the shadow cabinet, including Long-Bailey, had also signed up to it, notes the Guardian.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For a round-up of the most important stories from around the world - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Start your trial subscription today –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Renationalisation and tuition fees
Nandy became the candidate putting the most clear water between herself and Corbyn’s regime when she criticised plans to renationalise industries and infrastructure, and the pledge to scrap university tuition fees.
The Wigan MP said: “People are smarter than we think. We can’t go round as a party promising to nationalise everything, to get rid of tuition fees, when we haven’t got a clue how we would do it, or how we would pay for it.”
This did not play well with former Labour policy chief Andrew Fisher, the Guardian says. He tweeted later it was “nauseating” to hear a Labour MP say this when, in fact, all the policy ideas were “fully costed in 2017 and 2019”.
Starmer has pledged to stick with the plan introduced under Corbyn to scrap tuition fees.
Private schools
The Daily Telegraph notes that the candidates all agreed they would drop Corbyn’s policy of scrapping private schools – the 2019 Labour manifesto included a pledge to “integrate all private schools into the state sector”.
The four candidates have all also said they would abandon Labour plans to bring in a four-day working week nationally, the Telegraph adds.
-
7 mountain hotels perfect for a tranquil autumn or winter escapeThe Week Recommends Get (altitude) high and unwind
-
‘Deskilling’: a dangerous side effect of AI useThe explainer Workers are increasingly reliant on the new technology
-
The biggest sports betting scandals in historyIn Depth The recent indictments of professional athletes were the latest in a long line of scandals
-
Five takeaways from Plaid Cymru’s historic Caerphilly by-election winThe Explainer The ‘big beasts’ were ‘humbled’ but there was disappointment for second-placed Reform too
-
The Chinese threat: No. 10’s evidence leads to more questionsTalking Point Keir Starmer is under pressure after collapsed spying trial
-
Taking the low road: why the SNP is still standing strongTalking Point Party is on track for a fifth consecutive victory in May’s Holyrood election, despite controversies and plummeting support
-
The end of ‘golden ticket’ asylum rightsThe Explainer Refugees lose automatic right to bring family over and must ‘earn’ indefinite right to remain
-
Your Party: a Pythonesque shamblesTalking Point Comical disagreements within Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana's group highlight their precarious position
-
Behind the ‘Boriswave’: Farage plans to scrap indefinite leave to remainThe Explainer The problem of the post-Brexit immigration surge – and Reform’s radical solution
-
Can the Lib Dems be a party of government again?Today's Big Question Leader Ed Davey is urged to drop the stunts and present a serious plan for the country
-
What is Donald Trump’s visit worth to the UK economy?In the Spotlight Centrepiece of the president’s trip, business-wise, is a ‘technology partnership’
