The Labour leader contenders set out their stalls on a special edition of Newsnight last night ahead of the impending membership vote.
Lisa Nandy, Keir Starmer, Rebecca Long-Bailey and Emily Thornberry are all competing to replace Jeremy Corbyn. The winning candidate will have to try to bring the party back from a historically bad election result and restore a reputation damaged by accusations of anti-Semitism.
The Guardian says all the candidates have adopted at least part of the 2019 manifesto, so policy differences between them have been “relatively modest” so far. Instead, they have sought to differentiate themselves on matters of “internal party democracy”.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Nandy, Starmer and Long-Bailey are all guaranteed spots on the ballot paper when the vote by Labour members opens on 21 February. Thornberry still has to secure 33 Constituency Labour Party nominations.
Anti-Semitism
The issue that has overshadowed much of Corbyn’s leadership also dominated last night’s debate. According to the BBC, Thornberry landed a much-needed “zinger” when she criticised Long-Bailey’s track record on tackling anti-Semitism, while the Guardian calls it “some of the liveliest exchanges”.
Thornberry said she had “regularly called out anti-Semitism” in Labour and added that, in the shadow cabinet, she and Starmer had asked for “regular reports” on the issue. Asked if Long-Bailey had done the same, Thornberry said: “No, I don’t think Rebecca did.”
Long-Bailey replied: “I did, I think you’ll find.” Thornberry replied, sharply: “Sorry, I don’t remember.”
All four candidates said they would challenge anti-Semitism in the party, apologised for it and agreed they would sign up to the ten pledges proposed by the Board of Deputies of British Jews to tackle racism.
Starmer, seen as the key Remain candidate, was at pains to deny that he had been the architect of Labour’s Brexit policy. Corbyn’s pledge to hold a second referendum on EU membership, in which Labour would stay neutral, has been damned by his critics as falling flat with voters fed up with the issue.
Starmer was forced on the defensive last night, insisting other members of the shadow cabinet, including Long-Bailey, had also signed up to it, notes the Guardian.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For a round-up of the most important stories from around the world - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Start your trial subscription today –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Renationalisation and tuition fees
Nandy became the candidate putting the most clear water between herself and Corbyn’s regime when she criticised plans to renationalise industries and infrastructure, and the pledge to scrap university tuition fees.
The Wigan MP said: “People are smarter than we think. We can’t go round as a party promising to nationalise everything, to get rid of tuition fees, when we haven’t got a clue how we would do it, or how we would pay for it.”
This did not play well with former Labour policy chief Andrew Fisher, the Guardian says. He tweeted later it was “nauseating” to hear a Labour MP say this when, in fact, all the policy ideas were “fully costed in 2017 and 2019”.
Starmer has pledged to stick with the plan introduced under Corbyn to scrap tuition fees.
Private schools
The Daily Telegraph notes that the candidates all agreed they would drop Corbyn’s policy of scrapping private schools – the 2019 Labour manifesto included a pledge to “integrate all private schools into the state sector”.
The four candidates have all also said they would abandon Labour plans to bring in a four-day working week nationally, the Telegraph adds.
-
The environmental cost of GLP-1sThe explainer Producing the drugs is a dirty process
-
Greenland’s capital becomes ground zero for the country’s diplomatic straitsIN THE SPOTLIGHT A flurry of new consular activity in Nuuk shows how important Greenland has become to Europeans’ anxiety about American imperialism
-
‘This is something that happens all too often’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
How corrupt is the UK?The Explainer Decline in standards ‘risks becoming a defining feature of our political culture’ as Britain falls to lowest ever score on global index
-
The Mandelson files: Labour Svengali’s parting gift to StarmerThe Explainer Texts and emails about Mandelson’s appointment as US ambassador could fuel biggest political scandal ‘for a generation’
-
Will Peter Mandelson and Andrew testify to US Congress?Today's Big Question Could political pressure overcome legal obstacles and force either man to give evidence over their relationship with Jeffrey Epstein?
-
Reforming the House of LordsThe Explainer Keir Starmer’s government regards reform of the House of Lords as ‘long overdue and essential’
-
How long can Keir Starmer last as Labour leader?Today's Big Question Pathway to a coup ‘still unclear’ even as potential challengers begin manoeuvring into position
-
What is at stake for Starmer in China?Today’s Big Question The British PM will have to ‘play it tough’ to achieve ‘substantive’ outcomes, while China looks to draw Britain away from US influence
-
Can Starmer continue to walk the Trump tightrope?Today's Big Question PM condemns US tariff threat but is less confrontational than some European allies
-
The high street: Britain’s next political battleground?In the Spotlight Mass closure of shops and influx of organised crime are fuelling voter anger, and offer an opening for Reform UK
