The Russian military unit that poisoned former double agent Sergei Skripal has been paying Taliban fighters to kill American troops serving in Afghanistan, according to US intelligence reports.
In a “significant and provocative escalation” of the Putin government’s covert activities, Russian agents “secretly offered bounties to Taliban-linked militants for killing coalition forces”, says The New York Times (NYT).
The payments “are believed to have resulted in the deaths of several US service members”, The Washington Post reports, citing “intelligence gleaned from US military interrogations of captured militants in recent months”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
British troops were also targeted, an unnamed “European intelligence official” told CNN - although whether any died as a result of the operation is unclear.
Both Russia and the Taliban have denied the allegations. “These kinds of deals with the Russian intelligence agency are baseless,” said Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid. “Our target killings and assassinations were ongoing in years before, and we did it on our own resources.”
Donald Trump has also dismissed the reports as “fake news”, but other intelligence agencies have offered unofficial corroboration.
“British sources did not deny the accuracy of the allegations”, but rather “gave every indication that the report of bounties being offered to the Taliban was based on fact”, says The Times.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For a round-up of the most important stories from around the world - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Start your trial subscription today –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Who was responsible?
The US government believes the operation “to be the handiwork of Unit 29155, an arm of Russia’s military intelligence agency, known widely as the GRU”, says the NYT.
The Times adds: “This is the elite subversion and assassination wing of the GRU, Russia’s military intelligence arm, whose agents were charged with the attempted murder of Sergei and Yulia Skripal in Salisbury in 2018.”
The GRU was also “at the centre of Moscow’s covert efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election”, according to the NYT.
Who knew what and when?
“There was discussion as far back as February and March in the US intelligence community and among the top military commanders about the Russian operation,” says CNN. The claims were reportedly taken seriously enough to result in “some efforts at protecting US forces”.
According to the NYT, “the intelligence finding was briefed to President Trump, and the White House’s National Security Council discussed the problem at an interagency meeting in late March”.
That claim has been strongly disputed by White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany, who said: “Neither the president nor the vice president were briefed on the alleged Russian bounty intelligence.”
Trump has repeated that denial, tweeting that his intelligence services “did not find this info credible, and therefore did not report it to me”.
However, a former senior Pentagon official told The Times that “it beggars the imagination” that the president would not have been briefed. “It suggests gross dereliction of duty by senior US government officials or a colossal breakdown of the national security decision-making process,” he told the newspaper.
What will happen next?
“The issue is not when the president was briefed,” a source told The Washington Post, “but rather, now that you are aware of it, what are you going to do about it?”
Even Senator Lindsey Graham, a vocal Trump ally, said it was “imperative Congress get to the bottom of” the allegations.
But it remains “unclear whether [Trump] will choose to take action”, says Vox.
The reports - and Trump’s furious reaction - has provided his critics with “further evidence that the president has failed to adequately curb the influence of Russia and has instead sought to foster a cosy relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin”, says NPR.
Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden put it more bluntly.
“His entire presidency has been a gift to Putin,” Biden said, “but this is beyond the pale.”
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For a round-up of the most important stories from around the world - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Start your trial subscription today –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Is Donald Trump behind potential Gaza ceasefire and will it work?
Ukraine-Russia: are both sides readying for nuclear war?
Incendiary device plot: Russia's 'rehearsals' for attacks on transatlantic flights
Where is the safest place in a nuclear attack?
The North Korean troops readying for deployment in Ukraine
Russia and Iran 'up the ante' after meeting in Turkmenistan
Experts call for a Nato bank to 'Trump-proof' military spending
What would happen if Russia declared war on Nato?
