Was suspending Jeremy Corbyn the first big misstep of Keir Starmer’s leadership?
Former leader readmitted to party but will not have Labour whip restored

Jeremy Corbyn has been reinstated to Labour following his suspension from the party but will not have the whip restored - meaning he will no longer sit as a party MP.
The decision to resume Corbyn’s 55-year membership less than three weeks after the former party leader was suspended over an anti-Semitism row has been “hailed by his supporters”, but “threatens the shaky truce with Jewish Labour members and concerned MPs”, The Guardian says.
Acknowledging these tensions, current leader Keir Starmer yesterday tweeted that the decision marked “another painful day for the Jewish community and those Labour members who have fought so hard to tackle antisemiticism”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What has happened with Corbyn’s party membership?
Corbyn was suspended at the end of October after an inquiry by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) concluded that Labour was “responsible for unlawful acts of harassment and discrimination” during its handling of anti-Semitism complaints.
In response to the watchdog’s report, Corbyn issued a statement claiming that the “scale of the problem” was “dramatically overstated for political reasons by our opponents inside and outside the party, as well as by much of the media”.
Following the suspension of any Labour member, the evidence against them is investigated by Labour staff in the party’s Governance and Legal Unit (GLU). The GLU then gives its recommendations to a panel of five members of the National Executive Committee (NEC).
In other words, the NEC, rather than Starmer and his team, made the decision to reinstate Corbyn.
And Starmer has announced that despite his reinstatement as a member of the party, Corbyn will not resume the Labour whip and will not sit as a Labour MP. In a tweet earlier today, the party chief wrote that his predecessor had “undermined and set back our work in restoring trust and confidence in the Labour Party’s ability to tackle antisemitism”.
However, Starmer added that “I will keep this situation under review”.
Meanwhile, supporters of Corbyn have “seized on a clause in the Labour Party rulebook that states that Labour MPs must also be members of the parliamentary Labour Party” - which they claim means that he “was automatically returned to the Labour whip after he was readmitted to the party”, The Times reports.
James Schneider, Corbyn’s former director of strategic communications, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that “it would be a decision for the leadership to now withdraw the whip if that’s what they wanted to do”.
And the reaction?
Unite general secretary Len McCluskey, a close ally of Corbyn, has welcomed the former leader’s readmission as the “correct, fair and unifying decision”.
“As a party we now move forward to implement the EHRC’s recommendations and redouble our efforts to inspire voters about Keir’s 10 pledges and the transformation of our nations into fairer places for our people,” McCluskey tweeted.
In a further show of support, five Labour councillors in Lancaster resigned from the party last night just minutes before Corbyn was reinstated, in protest against his treatment. The group insisted the surprise move had not altered their position, and described Corbyn’s suspension as “an unjust attack on a decent man and an attack on the Left”.
But the decision to welcome him back has caused anger too.
The Guardian reports that “at least one Labour MP” told colleagues on Tuesday night that they felt “betrayed” by Corbyn’s reinstatement and were “considering their position in the party”.
The Jewish Labour Movement (JVM) has also expressed anger over the “extraordinary” move, which the group claims was the work of a “factionally aligned political committee”.
Labour MP Margaret Hodge has condemned the decision too, saying: “I simply cannot comprehend why it is acceptable for Corbyn to be a Labour MP if he thinks anti-Semitism is exaggerated and a political attack, refuses to apologise, never takes responsibility for his actions and rejects the findings of the EHRC report.”
Has Starmer made a strategic misstep?
The Labour leader has a “tight window to decide what to do about Corbyn, if he is to avoid handing Boris Johnson a gift”, The Telegraph says. But “it is how it plays out in his own party that will probably be the bigger concern”.
The BBC’s political correspondent Iain Waston argues that whichever decision Starmer had taken, “criticism would have followed”.
“Putting Labour under fresh leadership hasn’t silenced or banished those still supportive of the old leadership,” Watson writes, but reinstating Corbyn “was bound to attract criticism from those cheered by his suspension”.
All the same, Corbyn’s return should “smooth Starmer’s efforts towards unity with the left of the party” following a turbulent few months, says The Guardian.
Sounding a less positive note, the New Statesman’s political editor Stephen Bush suggests that entire drama surrounding Corbyn’s membership has been “an unmitigated disaster” for Starmer, and “will do nothing to repair relations with Britain’s Jewish community”.
Starmer is not “trusted by the party’s Corbynite wing, in part because of Corbyn’s suspension”, Bush writes. “But in having been outplayed in the party’s internal structures and institutions, he has not won any new allies either.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
What does the Le Pen verdict mean for the future of French politics?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION Convicted of embezzlement and slapped with a five year ban on running for public office, where does arch-conservative Marine Le Pen go from here — and will the movement she leads follow?
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Discount stores were thriving. How did they stumble?
The Explainer Blame Walmart — and inflation
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Kaja Kallas: the EU's new chief diplomat shaping the future of European defense
In the Spotlight Former Estonian Prime Minister's status as an uncompromising Russia hawk has gone from liability to strength
By David Faris Published
-
Local elections 2025: where are they and who is on course to win?
The Explainer Reform UK predicted to make large gains, with 23 councils and six mayoralties up for grabs
By The Week UK Published
-
What is Starmer's £33m plan to smash 'vile' Channel migration gangs?
Today's Big Question PM lays out plan to tackle migration gangs like international terrorism, with cooperation across countries and enhanced police powers
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
The tribes battling it out in Keir Starmer's Labour Party
The Explainer From the soft left to his unruly new MPs, Keir Starmer is already facing challenges from some sections of the Labour Party
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Are we on the brink of a recession?
Today's Big Question Britain's shrinking economy is likely to upend Rachel Reeves' Spring Statement spending plans
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Has Starmer put Britain back on the world stage?
Talking Point UK takes leading role in Europe on Ukraine and Starmer praised as credible 'bridge' with the US under Trump
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What did Starmer actually get out of Trump?
Today's Big Question US president's remarks, notably on tariffs and the Chagos Islands, were encouraging but vague
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
How should Keir Starmer handle Donald Trump?
Today's Big Question Meeting the president in Washington calls for some delicate diplomacy from the PM
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
How will Keir Starmer pay for greater defence spending?
Today's Big Question Funding for courts, prisons, local government and the environment could all be at risk
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published