Virginia shooting: is it dangerous to watch graphic videos?
Murder of journalists 'a macabre reminder' of how cyberspace has become a conduit for scenes of death

Video footage showing the murder of two reporters in Virginia has reignited the debate around watching and sharing graphic content online.
The introduction of auto-play options on Facebook and Twitter means it is becoming increasingly difficult to avoid seeing gruesome videos that routinely circulate on social media.
Footage of this week's shooting was shared thousands of times and is yet another "macabre reminder of how cyberspace has become a conduit for scenes of death," writes Rhys Blakely in The Times.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Journalist Gideon Lichfield argues that people who watch and share these videos, much like the footage of executions carried out by Islamic State, are playing into the hands of the murderers.
"Images don't have agendas," he writes for Quartz. "Those who spread them do. When you next are tempted by a link with a self-conscious 'WARNING: GRAPHIC' before it, ask not 'Is this going to be too gruesome?' but instead 'Why do they want me to see it?'"
Poynter, a non-profit school for journalism, argues that there has to be a purpose to justify the use of such graphic content, such as resolving disputes of what occurred – such as the recent cases of US police officers killing unarmed black men Eric Garner and Michael Brown.
Defending his decision not to show the video of Islamic State militants executing US journalist James Foley last year, New York Times executive editor Dean Baquet said: "There is no journalistic value to my mind of showing what a beheading looks like."
Journalist Sarah Frier agrees, writing in Bloomberg: "Images of violence against Foley can be seen as spreading a terrorist's message, while publicising Brown's death shines a light on a perceived injustice."
However Yael T. Abouhalkah, a journalist at the Kansas City Star, argues that the public should watch the Virginia video in order to fully confront the issue of gun crime and make clear the depth of the tragedy. "We need to see literal, grisly truth of carnage caused by guns in America. It's not a video game, people," he tweeted.
But psychologists warn that such videos can cause long-lasting damage to a person's mental health. "It is very important that people do not underestimate the disturbing effect of material such as this," says Rob Gordon, a clinical psychologist who specialises in trauma counselling.
For anyone who has experienced any kind of trauma, viewing such footage can easily cause them to relive their own experience, he warns. "People who are struggling with or carrying tragedy really need to keep away from that stuff, just like a person with a compromised immune system needs to keep away from someone with a bad cold," he told WANews.
"But ultimately, the power no longer rests solely with the heads of media organisations," writes Tara Culp-Ressler in Think Progress. As New Yorker journalist Philip Gourevitch recently argued: "we are, to some degree, our own editors when we choose to click or not."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Trump pauses all new foreign student visas
speed read The State Department has stopped scheduling interviews with those seeking student visas in preparation for scrutiny of applicants' social media
-
'The benefits of such a program go beyond just the data'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
May 28 editorial cartoons
Cartoons Wednesday's political cartoons include the Big Beautiful Bill's impact on Medicare and Medicaid, Donald Trump and JD Vance plotting in the Oval Office, Russia's expansionist plans, and Trump's phone call with Vladimir Putin.
-
What happens if tensions between India and Pakistan boil over?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION As the two nuclear-armed neighbors rattle their sabers in the wake of a terrorist attack on the contested Kashmir region, experts worry that the worst might be yet to come
-
Why Russia removed the Taliban's terrorist designation
The Explainer Russia had designated the Taliban as a terrorist group over 20 years ago
-
Inside the Israel-Turkey geopolitical dance across Syria
THE EXPLAINER As Syria struggles in the wake of the Assad regime's collapse, its neighbors are carefully coordinating to avoid potential military confrontations
-
'Like a sound from hell': Serbia and sonic weapons
The Explainer Half a million people sign petition alleging Serbian police used an illegal 'sound cannon' to disrupt anti-government protests
-
The arrest of the Philippines' former president leaves the country's drug war in disarray
In the Spotlight Rodrigo Duterte was arrested by the ICC earlier this month
-
Ukrainian election: who could replace Zelenskyy?
The Explainer Donald Trump's 'dictator' jibe raises pressure on Ukraine to the polls while the country is under martial law
-
Why Serbian protesters set off smoke bombs in parliament
THE EXPLAINER Ongoing anti-corruption protests erupted into full view this week as Serbian protesters threw the country's legislature into chaos
-
Who is the Hat Man? 'Shadow people' and sleep paralysis
In Depth 'Sleep demons' have plagued our dreams throughout the centuries, but the explanation could be medical