Jaguar I-Pace vs. Tesla Model X: how the electric SUVs compare
Both offer semi-autonomous safety features and impressive ranges but which is best?
The electric car market has gained a new player, with Jaguar’s eagerly anticipated I-Pace now available to order.
The mid-size, premium crossover has an all-electric powertrain and is the first Jaguar vehicle to feature a battery electric system.
The I-Pace will be going up against the highly popular Tesla Model X, its only rival in the electrified SUV market.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Both cars offer impressive battery ranges and feature hi-tech semi-autonomous safety systems, but which will car buyers prefer?
Here’s how they compares:
Price
The I-Pace [pictured top] has the lower price tag of the two. A base-spec model, badged EV400 S, costs £63,495, while the entry-level Model X 75D will set buyers back an additional £7,000.
Range-topping I-Paces, called First Editions, cost £80,925, which is significantly cheaper than the Tesla’s most expensive SUV, the £128,250 Model X P100D.
Range and on-road performance
Comparing the battery range of the two EVs is tricky, because they were measured using different procedures.
On paper, the Model X 75D [pictured above] offers a battery range of 251 miles, jumping to 351 miles in the more expensive 100D version.
That suggests the 100D trumps the I-Pace’s 298-mile range, but Wired argues that Jaguar’s claimed battery range may be more accurate than the Tesla’s.
The I-Pace has been measured using the Worldwide harmonised Light vehicle Test Procedure (WLTP), which is widely believed to provide more accurate measurements than the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) system used to calculate the Model X’s range.
That said, the Model X is the clear winner when it comes to performance.
Range-topping P100D versions can do 0-62mph in less than three seconds, far faster than the I-Pace’s time of 4.5 seconds, says Top Gear.
Practicality and driving tech
Those looking for a car with a big boot will want to go for the Model X. It comes with a cavernous 2,367 litres of space when the rear seats are folded down - 941 litres more than the I-Pace.
The Model X can also be specced as a seven-seater, whereas the I-Pace is a five-seat only crossover.
Both come with a host of semi-autonomous safety measures as standard, including collision avoidance and automatic emergency braking systems.
Tesla buyers can pay out £5,700 to spec the company’s Autopilot system, which allows drivers to automatically match the speed of moving traffic and change lanes without moving the steering wheel. There’s even an option to let the car park itself.
Meanwhile, mid-range I-Pace SE models and above get “blind-spot monitoring, adaptive cruise control and high-speed emergency braking”, Carbuyer reports.
Verdict
Tesla is “leading the way” in the shift towards electric cars, says the Daily Express.
Although the Model X is more expensive than the I-Pace, the Tesla offers significantly more interior space and can be fitted with more seats, making it the more practical option, argues CNet.
Engadget disagrees, insisting that the I-Pace “feels like a more polished vehicle” and that the “price difference is a nice bonus”.
“Jaguar has taken what it's learned from its own history, from sister company Land Rover and from other automakers (including Tesla) and created the best luxury SUV on the road today,” the tech news site concludes.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Puppet shows, pagodas and pho: a guide to Hanoi
The Week Recommends Vietnam's capital city blends the ancient with the new
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
'There are benefits, but not acknowledging them would tell only half of the story'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
What Trump's win could mean for Big Tech
Talking Points The tech industry is bracing itself for Trump's second administration
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
The Count of Monte Cristo review: 'indecently spectacular' adaptation
The Week Recommends Dumas's classic 19th-century novel is once again given new life in this 'fast-moving' film
By The Week UK Published
-
Death of England: Closing Time review – 'bold, brash reflection on racism'
The Week Recommends The final part of this trilogy deftly explores rising political tensions across the country
By The Week UK Published
-
Sing Sing review: prison drama bursts with 'charm, energy and optimism'
The Week Recommends Colman Domingo plays a real-life prisoner in a performance likely to be an Oscars shoo-in
By The Week UK Published
-
Kaos review: comic retelling of Greek mythology starring Jeff Goldblum
The Week Recommends The new series captures audiences as it 'never takes itself too seriously'
By The Week UK Published
-
Blink Twice review: a 'stylish and savage' black comedy thriller
The Week Recommends Channing Tatum and Naomi Ackie stun in this film on the hedonistic rich directed by Zoë Kravitz
By The Week UK Published
-
Shifters review: 'beautiful' new romantic comedy offers 'bittersweet tenderness'
The Week Recommends The 'inventive, emotionally astute writing' leaves audiences gripped throughout
By The Week UK Published
-
How to do F1: British Grand Prix 2025
The Week Recommends One of the biggest events of the motorsports calendar is back and better than ever
By Rebekah Evans, The Week UK Published
-
Twisters review: 'warm-blooded' film explores dangerous weather
The Week Recommends The film, focusing on 'tornado wranglers', stars Daisy Edgar-Jones and Glen Powell
By The Week UK Published