What does Donald Trump really believe about Russian meddling?
US president backtracks on comments denying Russia interfered in US election
Donald Trump has bowed to widespread condemnation of his comments denying Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election, following a summit with Russian president Vladimir Putin in Helsinki.
The New York Times says Trump was “under unrelenting pressure from congressional Republicans, his own advisers and his allies on Fox News”, forcing him to claim that he had “misspoken” during a subsequent news conference.
Speaking about Russian interference in US elections during the press conference on Monday, Trump said: “I have President Putin; he just said it’s not Russia. I will say this: I don’t see any reason why it would be.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
However, yesterday Trump tried to walk back that comment, reading from a script: “The sentence should have been, ‘I don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t be Russia,’ …sort of a double negative. So you can put that in, and I think that probably clarifies things pretty good.”
Trump also voiced his support for US intelligence agencies, “a day after he had refused to accept their findings on Russia's election interference over Putin's denials”, CNN says.
The Washington Post notes that Trump appeared to regularly stray from his prepared remarks, a tactic that has traditionally played well with his support base.
“I accept our intelligence community’s conclusion that Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election took place,” Trump read from the script, before adding an off-script remark: “Could be other people also. A lot of people out there”.
So does the US president believe Russia meddled in the 2016 US election? To determine what he thinks, it is important to focus on the unscripted part of his statement, said CNN's Chris Cillizza.
“Focus on the five words at the end there: ‘Could be other people also’”, Cillizza said. “What those five words reveal is that Trump is still not at all convinced that Russia was the one who interfered in the 2016 election - or, at a minimum, that Russia acted alone. Which means that in purposely trying to fix the mess he made by suggesting he didn't totally believe his own intelligence community, Trump made the point that he doesn't totally believe his own intelligence community.”
Regardless of his own views, the US president’s attempt to clarify his position did little to allay the criticisms of his performance in Helsinki. Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer tweeted: “President Trump tried to squirm away from what he said yesterday. It’s twenty-four hours too late, and in the wrong place.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
North Carolina Supreme Court risks undermining its legitimacy
Under the radar A contentious legal battle over whether to seat one of its own members threatens not only the future of the court's ideological balance, but its role in the public sphere
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Codeword: January 14, 2025
The Week's daily codeword puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sudoku hard: January 14, 2025
The Week's daily hard sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
Why Assad fell so fast
The Explainer The newly liberated Syria is in an incredibly precarious position, but it's too soon to succumb to defeatist gloom
By The Week UK Published
-
Romania's election rerun
The Explainer Shock result of presidential election has been annulled following allegations of Russian interference
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Russia's shadow war in Europe
Talking Point Steering clear of open conflict, Moscow is slowly ratcheting up the pressure on Nato rivals to see what it can get away with.
By The Week UK Published
-
Cutting cables: the war being waged under the sea
In the Spotlight Two undersea cables were cut in the Baltic sea, sparking concern for the global network
By The Week UK Published
-
The nuclear threat: is Vladimir Putin bluffing?
Talking Point Kremlin's newest ballistic missile has some worried for Nato nations
By The Week UK Published
-
Russia vows retaliation for Ukrainian missile strikes
Speed Read Ukraine's forces have been using U.S.-supplied, long-range ATCMS missiles to hit Russia
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
Has the Taliban banned women from speaking?
Today's Big Question 'Rambling' message about 'bizarre' restriction joins series of recent decrees that amount to silencing of Afghanistan's women
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Cuba's energy crisis
The Explainer Already beset by a host of issues, the island nation is struggling with nationwide blackouts
By Rebekah Evans, The Week UK Published