What does Donald Trump really believe about Russian meddling?
US president backtracks on comments denying Russia interfered in US election
Donald Trump has bowed to widespread condemnation of his comments denying Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election, following a summit with Russian president Vladimir Putin in Helsinki.
The New York Times says Trump was “under unrelenting pressure from congressional Republicans, his own advisers and his allies on Fox News”, forcing him to claim that he had “misspoken” during a subsequent news conference.
Speaking about Russian interference in US elections during the press conference on Monday, Trump said: “I have President Putin; he just said it’s not Russia. I will say this: I don’t see any reason why it would be.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
However, yesterday Trump tried to walk back that comment, reading from a script: “The sentence should have been, ‘I don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t be Russia,’ …sort of a double negative. So you can put that in, and I think that probably clarifies things pretty good.”
Trump also voiced his support for US intelligence agencies, “a day after he had refused to accept their findings on Russia's election interference over Putin's denials”, CNN says.
The Washington Post notes that Trump appeared to regularly stray from his prepared remarks, a tactic that has traditionally played well with his support base.
“I accept our intelligence community’s conclusion that Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election took place,” Trump read from the script, before adding an off-script remark: “Could be other people also. A lot of people out there”.
So does the US president believe Russia meddled in the 2016 US election? To determine what he thinks, it is important to focus on the unscripted part of his statement, said CNN's Chris Cillizza.
“Focus on the five words at the end there: ‘Could be other people also’”, Cillizza said. “What those five words reveal is that Trump is still not at all convinced that Russia was the one who interfered in the 2016 election - or, at a minimum, that Russia acted alone. Which means that in purposely trying to fix the mess he made by suggesting he didn't totally believe his own intelligence community, Trump made the point that he doesn't totally believe his own intelligence community.”
Regardless of his own views, the US president’s attempt to clarify his position did little to allay the criticisms of his performance in Helsinki. Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer tweeted: “President Trump tried to squirm away from what he said yesterday. It’s twenty-four hours too late, and in the wrong place.”
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The next place you'll find Starlink tech isn't a war zone — it's your airplane seat
Under the Radar Several major airlines are offering free in-flight Wi-Fi through the technology
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
The fishy diplomacy causing tensions between Bangladesh and India
Under The Radar Exports of a 'sacred' fish were recently suspended during difficult relations for the two nations
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Today's political cartoons - October 6, 2024
Cartoons Sunday's cartoons - Sunday scaries, in-fighting, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Putin's fixation with shamans
Under the Radar Secretive Russian leader, said to be fascinated with occult and pagan rituals, allegedly asked for blessing over nuclear weapons
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
A brief history of third parties in the US
In Depth Though none of America's third parties have won a presidential election, they have nonetheless had a large impact on the country's politics
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Chimpanzees are dying of human diseases
Under the radar Great apes are vulnerable to human pathogens thanks to genetic similarity, increased contact and no immunity
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Deaths of Jesse Baird and Luke Davies hang over Sydney's Mardi Gras
The Explainer Police officer, the former partner of TV presenter victim, charged with two counts of murder after turning himself in
By Austin Chen, The Week UK Published
-
Quiz of The Week: 24 February - 1 March
Puzzles and Quizzes Have you been paying attention to The Week's news?
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will mounting discontent affect Iran election?
Today's Big Question Low turnout is expected in poll seen as crucial test for Tehran's leadership
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Sweden clears final NATO hurdle with Hungary vote
Speed Read Hungary's parliament overwhelmingly approved Sweden's accession to NATO
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Modern royal scandals from around the world
The Explainer From Spain to the UAE, royal families have often been besieged by negative events
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published