Will Russian advance in Kharkiv prove decisive in Ukraine war?
Recent gains in northeast could be 'a momentary setback' or a 'turning point', as Kyiv counts the cost of US delay
Ukraine and its Western allies are hoping to hold off Russia's advance in the northeast Kharkiv region long enough for vital military aid to arrive, at the start of a decisive few weeks that could shape the outcome of the war.
The push towards Kharkiv, Ukraine's second city with a population of nearly two million, brings back traumatic memories of the early days of the war. Having repelled the initial Russian advance in spring 2022 Ukrainian troops successfully pushed them back over the border in a surprise counter-offensive in the autumn. Now, with Moscow once again on the front foot, there are fears the city could soon be within Russian artillery range.
"As anxiety spreads, some hard questions loom", said The New York Times: "how far will this go? Is it just a momentary setback for the underdog Ukrainians? Or a turning point?"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What did the commentators say?
Ukrainian officials and analysts have "long anticipated" an attack from Russia's Belgorod region over the border into Kharkiv, said the Financial Times, believing it to be "part of an uptick in operations intended to exploit Moscow's advantage in weaponry and manpower before the arrival of US military aid and Ukraine's expanded mobilisation efforts later this summer".
Yet the success of the Russian advance has come as a shock to many used to fighting a war that had ground to a virtual stalemate.
In just a matter of days Russian forces have made "small but significant gains" right along the border, reported BBC defence correspondent Jonathan Beale. Their advances are only a few miles deep but have swallowed up around 62 square miles of Ukrainian territory, a feat that in the more heavily defended east of the country, "it's taken Russia months to achieve". In fact, "it was Ukraine's worst loss of ground to Russia since March 2022", said the Kyiv Post.
The prospect of a "new, large-scale" offensive on Kharkiv has "loomed for months", admitted the Kyiv Independent but "now comes at a time when overstretched Ukrainian forces are steadily losing ground in several hotspots further southeast in Donetsk Oblast".
A Ukrainian defence forces official told the FT last week that the offensive by Russia in the northeast was primarily designed to draw Ukrainian forces away from the eastern Donbas region, which has been the epicentre of fighting in recent months.
Opening a new front in the north will undoubtedly stretch Ukraine's already limited resources, agreed Beale, but the Kharkiv offensive also "highlights problems Ukraine itself has been too slow to address – mobilising enough troops and building adequate defence lines".
Ukrainian officials have denied accusations of ill-preparedness but the Russian advance has put Ukraine in a "very dangerous spot", said The New York Times. Ukrainian troops have been complaining for months about severe shortages of ammunition and Ukrainian soldiers are overstretched and exhausted.
More than two years of trying to fight a country with three times the population to draw from has left Ukraine so "depleted and desperate for fresh troops that its lawmakers have voted to mobilise convicts," said the paper, a "controversial practice that Ukraine had ridiculed Russia for using in the first half of the war".
A new law, coming into effect this week gives greater powers to enlistment officers and will make life harder for draft dodgers, but it is still expected to take months to have an effect on the number of battle-ready troops ready to be deployed to the front.
What next?
For now, the Washington Post reported that US officials are watching the Russian push with "concern" but "do not yet believe that the Ukrainians are on the verge of a significant territorial loss".
American officials told the paper that Russia's decision to strike now was "probably motivated by the knowledge that Ukraine is rapidly re-arming, thanks to the funding recently approved by Congress after a delay of more than six months – meaning Kyiv will be appreciably stronger within weeks".
Yet there are fears the delay in Western aid has opened a narrow window of opportunity for Vladimir Putin.
The signs are that this surge marks the start of a "decisive battle that will be critical to the outcome of the war", said Politico.
"At stake is not just control of one of Ukraine's major population centres but potentially the country's capacity to keep fighting: if Kharkiv falls, Western resolve may soon follow."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Elliott Goat is a freelance writer at The Week Digital. A winner of The Independent's Wyn Harness Award, he has been a journalist for over a decade with a focus on human rights, disinformation and elections. He is co-founder and director of Brussels-based investigative NGO Unhack Democracy, which works to support electoral integrity across Europe. A Winston Churchill Memorial Trust Fellow focusing on unions and the Future of Work, Elliott is a founding member of the RSA's Good Work Guild and a contributor to the International State Crime Initiative, an interdisciplinary forum for research, reportage and training on state violence and corruption.
-
Today's political cartoons - December 14, 2024
Cartoons Saturday's cartoons - runaway inflation, eau de Trump, and more
By The Week US Published
-
5 bitingly funny cartoons about Bashar al-Assad in Moscow
Cartoons Artists take on unwelcome guests, home comforts, and more
By The Week US Published
-
The best books about money and business
The Week Recommends Featuring works by Michael Morris, Alan Edwards, Andrew Leigh and others.
By The Week UK Published
-
Ukraine-Russia: are both sides readying for nuclear war?
Today's Big Question Putin changes doctrine to lower threshold for atomic weapons after Ukraine strikes with Western missiles
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Incendiary device plot: Russia's 'rehearsals' for attacks on transatlantic flights
The Explainer Security officials warn of widespread Moscow-backed 'sabotage campaign' in retaliation for continued Western support for Ukraine
By The Week UK Published
-
The North Korean troops readying for deployment in Ukraine
The Explainer Third country wading into conflict would be 'the first step to a world war' Volodymyr Zelenskyy has warned
By The Week UK Published
-
Experts call for a Nato bank to 'Trump-proof' military spending
Under The Radar A new lender could aid co-operation and save millions of pounds, say think tanks
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
What would happen if Russia declared war on Nato?
In depth Response to an attack on UK or other Western allies would be 'overwhelming'
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Last updated
-
Missile escalation: will long-range rockets make a difference to Ukraine?
Today's Big Question Kyiv is hoping for permission to use US missiles to strike deep into Russian territory
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
Atesh: the Ukrainian partisans taking on Russia
Under The Radar Underground resistance fighters are risking their lives to defend their country
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
'Second only to a nuclear bomb' – the controversial arms Russia is using in Ukraine
The Explainer Thermobaric bombs 'capable of vaporising human bodies' have been used against Ukraine
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published