The special master in the Mar-a-Lago investigation has asked former President Donald Trump's lawyers to assert in a court filing whether they believe FBI agents lied about the materials seized from Trump's Florida mansion in August.
On Thursday, special master U.S. District Judge Raymond Dearie said Trump's legal team must confirm by Sept. 30 whether they think "any of the seized items were incorrectly described in the Justice Department's 11-page inventory list, which said some of the documents were highly classified," The Washington Post writes. Trump's attorneys must also make clear whether they are claiming certain items on the list weren't actually taken.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Meanwhile, the government has until Monday to comment on the merits of its own inventory list. It must also later respond to "any factual disputes that Trump's team raises in its filings," the Post summarizes, per the order.
Dearie said Trump's lawyers and the government should review the non-classified documents on a rolling basis. The former president's team should first review and mark any materials it believes are privileged before the Justice Department then agrees or disagrees with that assertion. Dearie would settle any disputes between the two parties.
All documents must be submitted to the special master by Oct. 21. Former U.S. Magistrate Judge James Orenstein will help Dearie with his review, Dearie said.
The Thursday order arrives after an appellate court on Wednesday sided with the DOJ in its request to access approximately 100 classified documents while the special master review continues.
-
5 cartoons of mass destruction about Dick Cheney’s legacyCartoon Artists take on hall of fame, pearly gates, and more
-
What happens to a Democratic Party without Nancy Pelosi?TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The storied former speaker of the House is set to retire, leaving congressional Democrats a complicated legacy and an uncertain future
-
The plant-based portfolio diet focuses on heart healthThe Explainer Its guidelines are flexible and vegan-friendly
-
‘This is where adaptation enters’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump ordered to fully fund SNAPSpeed Read The Justice Department is appealing the decision
-
Trump tariffs face stiff scrutiny at Supreme CourtSpeed Read Even some of the Court’s conservative justices appeared skeptical
-
The longest US government shutdown in historyThe Explainer Federal employees and low-income households have been particularly affected by ‘partisan standoffs’ in Washington
-
Democrats seek 2026 inspiration from special election routsIN THE SPOTLIGHT High-profile wins are helping a party demoralized by Trump’s reelection regain momentum
-
‘Not all news is bad’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
A most profitable presidencyfeature Donald Trump has added $3 billion to his wealth since returning to the White House. How?
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
