Would rescheduling cannabis be good news for the industry?
Following President Joe Biden's request, the HHS recommended that cannabis be moved to a less lethal category, and some experts are weary of the move


A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
Thank you for signing up to TheWeek. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.
Cannabis may be on its way to being less restricted in the U.S. after a recent recommendation from the Health and Human Services Department to reschedule the drug's classification. Last week, the HHS recommended that the U.S. Drug Enforcement move marijuana from Schedule 1, the strictest category, down to Schedule 3. The news came after President Joe Biden asked the HHS and the attorney general to review how marijuana fits within the drug classification system.
While this isn't the first time cannabis classification has come into question, experts believe the recommendation may stick this time. And while many are celebrating what they consider a step in the right direction, others aren't as enthusiastic about what that reclassification could mean.
How the government categorizes drugs
Under the Controlled Substances Act of 1970, certain substances are federally prohibited based on their potential for abuse and their varying degrees of medical use. The CSA is a national legal framework covering how all 50 states regulate the substances federal agencies deem dangerous. The severity of the drugs is categorized into five levels that the DEA calls schedules. The DEA has been responsible for enforcing the CSA while the Food and Drug Administration determines the medical efficacy of the drugs.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Cannabis has been classified in the strictest category, alongside drugs like heroin, LSD and ecstasy. To meet the criteria for this category, the substances must have "no currently accepted medical use" and a "high potential for abuse," per the DEA. The HHS recommended that cannabis be regrouped with Schedule 3 substances like ketamine, anabolic steroids, and Tylenol with codeine, which has a lower risk for abuse.
Ultimately, that change will lie in the hands of the DEA, which could take months to finish its evaluation. And with the growing number of states starting medicinal or recreational cannabis programs, the chasm between state and federal regulation is growing. This has made the issue "increasingly urgent for U.S. policymakers," Jonathan Roeder said in a Bloomberg newsletter. "Illicit competitors have taken advantage of the gray area to undercut licensed companies, which are also suffering from high taxes and scant access to financing," he added.
What rescheduling cannabis means and what it doesn't
Rescheduling will not automatically make cannabis legal. Schedule 3 drugs are still controlled substances that are "subject to various rules that allow for some medical uses and for federal criminal prosecution of anyone who traffics in the drugs without permission," The Associated Press stated. Still, reclassifying the drug has the potential to alleviate some of the financial pressure existing cannabis businesses are under and to open the door to more scientific research into the potential healing benefits of the drug.
The U.S. cannabis industry is hurting due to lack of capital, uniquely burdensome taxes, and nearly unfettered competition from unlicensed operators," Adam Goers, a co-chair of the Coalition for Cannabis Scheduling Reform, told Bloomberg. Rescheduling will "provide a massive boost to our industry," he added, "particularly social equity and small business owners who have suffered the most under the status quo."
Zachary Kobrin, a lawyer specializing in cannabis, agreed that the move would help the bottom line for the industry. He described Section 280E of the federal tax code, which prohibits companies from taking tax deductions if they sell an illegal substance, as "one of the most negatively impactful policies" on the industry in a statement to Bloomberg. "Cannabis companies currently have effective tax rates as high as 70% to 90%," Kobrin said.
Not everyone is on board with the HHS recommendation. Paul Armentano, the deputy director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), told the AP that reclassifying the drug would only perpetuate the "existing divide between state and federal marijuana policies." In an op-ed for NORML, Armentano also noted that it "continues to misrepresent the plant's safety relative to other controlled substances."
Kaliko Castille, the president of the Minority Cannabis Business Association President, agreed that rescheduling just "rebrands prohibition" instead of making things more transparent for state licensees or reversing the decades of disproportionate policing of people of color. "Schedule III is going to leave it in this kind of amorphous, mucky middle where people are not going to understand the danger of it still being federally illegal," he said to the AP.
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.
Sign up to our 10 Things You Need to Know Today newsletter
A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
Theara Coleman is a Staff Writer for The Week. A New York native, she previously served as a contributing writer and assistant editor for Honeysuckle Magazine, where she covered racial politics and cannabis industry news. Theara graduated from Howard University and New York University, receiving her BA and MA in English Literature, respectively. She has a background in education as a former High School English teacher. She brings her passion for reading, writing, and all things nerdy to her work as a journalist.
-
How Russell Brand built up his online following
The former comedian has tens of millions of followers across his social media platforms
By Sorcha Bradley Published
-
Fetterman's influence
By The Week Staff Published
-
'If Starmer seeks advice from Macron then God help Britain'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week Staff Published
-
What next for Ecuador after Fernando Villavicencio assassination?
feature The killing of a candidate ahead of this week’s elections follows years of crime and a rapidly increasing drugs trade
By Rebekah Evans Published
-
The UK’s problem with cocaine
feature Use of the drug is up by as much as a quarter in some UK cities, according to the National Crime Agency
By Felicity Capon Published
-
Top suspect in transformative 1982 cyanide-laced Tylenol murders dies uncharged
Speed Read
By Peter Weber Published
-
Why the French are taking to the streets
The Explainer France is protesting after the police-involved death of a teenager
By Justin Klawans Published
-
Do drugmakers have a constitutional right to set their own prices?
Talking Point Merck thinks so and is suing the U.S. government over it
By Justin Klawans Published
-
Seagulls ‘stealing drug stashes’
feature And other stories from the stranger side of life
By Chas Newkey-Burden Published
-
Walgreens to pay San Francisco $230M for its role in opioid epidemic
Speed Read
By Justin Klawans Published
-
Why are mass shootings rare in other countries despite high levels of gun ownership?
In Depth Firearm laws are very different in Finland, Switzerland, and Australia
By Justin Klawans Published