Stonewall Cameron: how they're taking PM's TV refusal
Cameron's ultimatum has not gone down well – given how keen he was to debate in 2010
It is hard to find a political commentator backing David Cameron’s refusal to face Ed Miliband in a pre-election TV debate – and his agreement to take part in only one debate with all the other party leaders. Some believe the broadcasters must take responsibility for the “mess”, but almost all agree the Prime Minister is cynically avoiding giving Miliband a chance to shine.
Cameron’s enthusiastic support for the debates at the last election has not been forgotten. “I think it is great we are having these debates,” he said in April 2010, “and I hope they go some way to restore some of the faith and some of the trust into our politics, because we badly need that once again in this country.
Many commentators quote yesterday’s remark by Nick Clegg: “I am bemused by the lofty pomposity of the Conservatives that they say they will deign to participate in one debate," said the Lib Dem leader. "They’re behaving as if they’re ordering a drink in the drawing room of Downton Abbey.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Here, in brief, is what a selection of commentators are saying today:
Janet Daley in the Daily Telegraph: “What are [the voters] to make of a leader who constantly derides the leader of the Opposition as a joke – a dead man walking electorally – and then backs away from a live debate with him? Surely he should be panting for the opportunity to tear him limb-from-limb on live television? The 2010 debates… created an instant tradition. Mr Cameron has done a very unwise thing in trying to turn the clock back. It will not be forgotten.”
John Harris in The Guardian: “Somewhere in their souls, the Prime Minister and his advisers must know that their protracted wriggling speaks to a contrast between Cameron of 2010 and the politician he has since turned into. Once he styled himself as a leader who was open and up for a challenge; now he looks more than ever like a cold power politician with a tinge of aristocratic contempt for rules and rituals that need only apply to others.”
Editorial in The Times: “To insiders, debates may seem too risky to be worth it, but ducking them is a straightforward electoral own goal that even Mr Miliband can’t miss. ‘Why are you running scared of TV debates?’ he asked yesterday. It’s a good question. Mr Cameron has a much better record in government than Mr Miliband did and he should be eager to defend it.”
Paddy Ashdown in the Daily Mirror: “By wriggling, ducking and slipping out of every proposal put forward by the broadcasters, the Prime Minister has shown his true colours. In the words of his great idol Margaret Thatcher, he is too ‘frit’ to defend his own record… These debates do not belong to the Prime Minister or the Tories, they belong to the British people.”
Stephen Bush for the New Statesman: “Downing Street calculates that the row over the debates will blow over and is unlikely to leave a mark, but a defeat to the unfancied Miliband could do them real damage. It means that the central focus of the short campaign will not be on the debates, as last time, but will instead hinge on set-piece interviews… That’s probably to the Prime Minister’s advantage; he’s a polished performer on these programmes, where Miliband tends to struggle.”
Paul Goodman for ConservativeHome.com: “Whatever happens next, we in the media will ramp the story up… and Downing Steet will cross its fingers and hope that it fades away. In the meantime, the voters will stifle a yawn, if they can be bothered to do even that. They are not marching in the streets to demand more politicians on their TV screens. The reverse, if anything.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Last hopes for justice for UK's nuclear test veterans
Under the Radar Thousands of ex-service personnel say their lives have been blighted by aggressive cancers and genetic mutations
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Donald Trump wreck the Brexit deal?
Today's Big Question President-elect's victory could help UK's reset with the EU, but a free-trade agreement with the US to dodge his threatened tariffs could hinder it
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is the next Tory leader up against?
Today's Big Question Kemi Badenoch or Robert Jenrick will have to unify warring factions and win back disillusioned voters – without alienating the centre ground
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is Lammy hoping to achieve in China?
Today's Big Question Foreign secretary heads to Beijing as Labour seeks cooperation on global challenges and courts opportunities for trade and investment
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Britain about to 'boil over'?
Today's Big Question A message shared across far-right groups listed more than 30 potential targets for violence in the UK today
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
UK's Starmer slams 'far-right thuggery' at riots
Speed Read The anti-immigrant violence was spurred by false rumors that the suspect in the Southport knife attack was an immigrant
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The Tamils stranded on 'secretive' British island in Indian Ocean
Under the Radar Migrants 'unlawfully detained' since 2021 shipwreck on UK-controlled Diego Garcia, site of important US military base
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published