War in Europe shouldn't be an excuse to trample free speech in the U.S.
Wars have never been very good for free expression in America. That might be true even when America isn't fighting the war.
On Monday morning, with Russia apparently on the brink of invading Ukraine, Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe tweeted that it might be time for American officials to start up treason prosecutions.
An uproar ensued, and Tribe deleted his tweet. Still, both because of his prominence and the recent tendency toward red-baiting by U.S. officials, it's worth considering why his proposal was so awful.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
As a factual matter, it was incorrect. Even if the United States gives a lot of weaponry and support to Ukraine, that country is not our ally — we have no treaty or other formal agreement to come to their defense in case of attack. Indeed, one of the hot debates during the last few months has been about whether the United States and other NATO countries will ever allow Ukraine to join the alliance and become an ally in a real, legal sense. Regardless of which side of that argument you take, it's a crucial distinction you would expect an Ivy League law professor to understand and acknowledge.
But Tribe's proposal was also terrible because the United States has a longtime habit of elbowing aside First Amendment rights during wartime. Those of us of a certain age remember when Bill Maher lost his job at ABC several months after 9/11, shortly after a White House spokesman warned that "all Americans … need to watch what they say, watch what they do." (The spokesman later protested that he was misunderstood, but that's not how his remarks were understood in the moment.) During World War I, Eugene Debs — who had been a Socialist candidate for president — was imprisoned after declaring "I will never go to war for a capitalist government." Similarly, Abraham Lincoln's administration had a Democratic congressman arrested for giving an anti-war speech during the Civil War. This country has a long history of ignoring its guaranteed rights during times of conflict. Those aren't our best moments.
If Tribe's tweet is bad on the merits, it's also terrible politics. Conservatives have convinced themselves and their voters that Democrats are the totalitarian, liberty-hating party. Most of the time that's nonsense — but when a prominent liberal like Tribe makes the case that Fox News personalities should be arrested, it gets a lot easier to make the case. Tucker Carlson's not leaving the air anytime soon, but he has another bullet in his rhetorical arsenal to use against liberals. Not great.
While I don't like Carlson's xenophobic reasoning, I agree it's a bad idea for the United States to go to war in Europe. (The same is true of most Americans — another reason Tribe's tweet fails the political smell test.) But even if I disagreed, I still think he should get the chance to make a case. Questions of war and peace are among the most critical a government can make. It's in such moments that America's commitment to free expression is needed most.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a freelance writer who has spent nine years as a syndicated columnist, co-writing the RedBlueAmerica column as the liberal half of a point-counterpoint duo. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic, The Kansas City Star and Heatmap News. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
'A speaker courageous enough to stand up to the extremists in his own party'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
How could the Supreme Court's Fischer v. US case impact the other Jan 6. trials including Trump's?
Today's Big Question A former Pennsylvania cop might hold the key to a major upheaval in how the courts treat the Capitol riot — and its alleged instigator
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Today's political cartoons - April 18, 2024
Cartoons Thursday's cartoons - impeachment Peanuts, record-breaking temperatures, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
It's not really about Biden's brain — unless it is
Talking Points Depending on who you ask, the renewed focus on the president's mental acuity is an election-year distraction, a legitimate point of concern, and sometimes both
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
The politics of music: should political rallies use well-known songs?
Talking Point The Smiths star Johnny Marr is latest musician to object to use of his music at a Donald Trump rally
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Cop 28 verdict: are climate summits working?
Talking Point Global leaders are not fully committed to averting the climate crisis, say critics
By The Week Staff Published