Why is the FDA slow to ban food additives?
A legal loophole lets things slide
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) banned the use of Red Dye No.3 in foods and has given drug manufacturers until Jan. 18, 2028, and food manufacturers until Jan. 15, 2027, to reformulate their products to remove it. This comes decades after the dye was banned from use in cosmetics and externally applied drugs in 1990. Red Dye No.3 has also already been banned for most uses in food products in the European Union, Australia and New Zealand.
Red Dye No. 3 is a "color additive made from petroleum," which "could previously be used in foods in small amounts as approved by the FDA on a per-case basis," said Forbes. It was banned in cosmetics after being linked to cancer in rats. However, the dye has been used in candy, baked goods and medications in trace amounts. Scientists have been pushing for a ban in food for decades, and California became the first state to ban it, with 10 other states introducing legislation to do so.
This is not the first time the FDA has been slow to ban a food additive that many other countries have. "There are more than 10,000 chemicals and additives allowed in food in the United States, often in small amounts," said CBS News. "But many haven't been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration in decades." The Trump administration has been vocal about its distrust of the FDA and has instructed all health agencies to "pause all external communications, such as health advisories, weekly scientific reports, updates to websites and social media posts," likely for review, said The Washington Post.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What did the commentators say?
The FDA has a rule for food additives that "gives corporations the license to add potentially harmful ingredients to foods without regulatory oversight or public notice," said the Los Angeles Times. The legal loophole is the agency's "generally recognized as safe," or GRAS, designation.
The designation was "created so that common household ingredients with a long history of safe use in food — like oil and vinegar, baking soda, and everyday spices and seasonings — would not have to go through rigorous safety reviews," said The Washington Post. The problem is that under the current rules "companies can skirt the premarket approval process and determine on their own that a new food additive or substance is 'generally recognized as safe.'" But "how companies go about determining that a new ingredient is safe is up to them."
This permits companies to convene their own panel of experts without regulation. The FDA then reviews the safety assessment. "In a safety assessment there usually are four sections: toxicology, chemistry, environmental impact and policy," said Linda Birnbaum, the former director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, and Dr. Maricel V. Maffini, an independent consultant who works on human and environmental health and chemical safety, regulation and policy, in an op-ed for Environmental Health News. "But it is unclear whether there is an epidemiologist among the reviewers." The FDA is also not required to reevaluate the safety of additives once they have been allowed.
This differs from the E.U. "If there are doubts about whether a chemical is safe or if there's no data to back up safety, the E.U. is much more likely to put a restriction on that chemical or just not allow it into the food supply at all," Melanie Benesh, the vice president of government affairs at the Environmental Working Group, said to Vox.
What next?
While the FDA has banned Red Dye No. 3, the ban "could face legal challenges from food manufacturers because evidence hasn't determined that the dye causes cancer when consumed by humans," said Euronews. Many companies have already reformulated or are working on doing so by using "beet juice; carmine, a dye made from insects; and pigments from foods such as purple sweet potato, radish and red cabbage."
The Red Dye No. 3 ban has been a long time coming, and experts have been looking to have other additives reassessed including Red Dye No. 40, BHA, brominated vegetable oil, potassium bromate and propyl paraben, which "have been linked to an increased risk of cancer and hyperactivity in children," said the Post. "Consumers should not be placed, as they have for the last several decades, in this situation where they need to check the package every time to see if this chemical that FDA should have banned is still there," Dr. Peter Lurie, the executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, said to The New York Times.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Devika Rao has worked as a staff writer at The Week since 2022, covering science, the environment, climate and business. She previously worked as a policy associate for a nonprofit organization advocating for environmental action from a business perspective.
-
How long will Trump's honeymoon last?
Talking Points The first days of a presidency are often the best
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Fukuoka: a Japanese metropolis with vibrant history, superb eating and a whole lot less tourists
The Week Recommends A harborside Japanese city that meshes the ancient and the very modern
By Scott Hocker, The Week US Published
-
Senate learns new Hegseth abuse, drinking allegations
speed read The former sister-in-law of Donald Trump's defense secretary nominee, Pete Hegseth, claims he was abusive
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Is this the end of cigarettes?
Today's Big Question An FDA rule targets nicotine addiction
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
The decline of the contraceptive pill
In the Spotlight Fears of the pill's side effects, stoked by social media, behind switch to fertility trackers – or no contraception at all
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Walking pneumonia cases are picking up pace
The explainer Another respiratory illness to be wary of
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
California declares bird flu emergency
Speed Read The emergency came hours after the nation's first person with severe bird flu infection was hospitalized
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
The future of fluoridated water is up for debate
The Explainer The oral benefits are watery
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Will the murder of a health insurance CEO cause an industry reckoning?
Today's Big Question UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was shot and killed in what police believe was a targeted attack
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Bird flu one mutuation from human threat, study finds
Speed Read A Scripps Research Institute study found one genetic tweak of the virus could enable its spread among people
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Dark chocolate tied to lower diabetes risk
Speed Read The findings were based on the diets of about 192,000 US adults over 34 years
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published