What is Erskine May?
Bible of parliamentary procedure is the glue that holds the UK’s unwritten constitution together
Known as the “bible of parliamentary procedure”, Erskine May has served as the authoritative guide to conventions in Parliament for nearly two centuries.
It is “often referred to but rarely read”, said one of its co-editors, Sir David Natzler. The rulebook plays a vital role in maintaining the conventions that hold the UK’s unwritten constitution together.
What is Erskine May?
Thomas Erskine May was a young assistant in the House of Commons library who produced the first edition of his Treatise on the Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament in 1844. The publication that bears his name has been regularly revised and updated over the subsequent 178 years across 25 editions, most recently in 2019.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Erskine May: Parliamentary Practice is the authoritative guide to parliamentary procedure and constitutional conventions, but “is not so much a ‘procedural bible’ as a description of how Parliament works”, wrote Mark Hutton, the other 2019 co-editor, for Hansard Society.
It performs a vital function in codifying the UK’s unwritten constitution as “at its root Parliament, although it has many rules, is not a rules-based organisation; it operates according to practice and precedent and its rules, whether expressed in standing orders or resolutions or even occasionally statute, are glosses on or amendments to that practice”, said Hutton, whose title is clerk of the journals.
Who is it for?
While “plainly for practitioners”, such as the Commons Speaker, MPs and officials, “it is not just for them”, wrote Natzler on The Constitution Unit Blog.
Recent controversies over decisions related to Brexit and threats to prorogue Parliament “served to remind all of us that parliamentary procedures are not some sort of secret masonic ritual to be understood only by a priestly caste of clerks and a handful of others, but are as integral to a parliamentary democracy as electoral rules”, he said.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
While regularly cited by the Speaker and referred to in Commons debates, Erskine May attracts wider public interest “and is influential outside the United Kingdom, particularly in countries which model their constitutional arrangements on the Westminster system”, said the UK Parliament website.
Previously costing £400 to buy, the latest 2019 edition was published online for the first time, a move which has “significant implications for democratic transparency and for Parliament's interaction with the public”, said Hutton.
What kind of rules does it contain?
Erskine is not a list of specific rules, “but instead a history of how the procedure has evolved throughout history which is used as a reference guide for complex political undertakings”, said the i news site.
Containing more than 2,000 sub-headings, it outlines how parliamentary procedures work, ranging from the passage of bills to the process of elections to how MPs communicate with the monarch. It is divided into sections that cover:
- The constitution and organisation of Parliament including the running of elections and conduct of MPs and peers
- Power and privileges of Parliament including rules governing freedom of speech
- Conduct of business
- Public legislation
- Financial procedure
- Committees
- Private legislation
Each new edition must also contend with changing social conventions and new technology, with the most recent edition including new provisions around the use of “hand-held electronic devices”, the introduction of “business-like attire”, which no longer obliges men to wear ties, rules around MPs bringing children into the chamber, and proxy voting for MPs on parental leave.
When has it been mentioned?
Erskine May sets out rules governing statements misleading Parliament, the rules MPs must follow when interacting with other MPs, language used in the chamber and protocols related to correcting the parliamentary record.
Not only does it dictate how MPs conduct themselves it also sets out what they can, and in some cases cannot, say.
The handbook states that no question can be put in Parliament “which brings the name of the sovereign or influence of the crown directly before parliament, or which casts reflections upon the sovereign”.
This explains why last week MPs were notably silent on the conduct of Prince Charles despite it being revealed that he had personally received millions of pounds in cash from a Qatari royal. The Sunday Times reported that “had MPs been exercised about the financial dealings of the future king revealed last weekend, they would not, according to these conventions, be allowed to ask a question about them in the House of Commons, unless it was part of a broader motion about, say, charity oversight”.
In January, Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer was reprimanded by the Speaker of the House, Sir Lindsay Hoyle, after he sought to contrast the behaviour of the Queen with that of lockdown-breaking parties in Downing Street.
In 2019, the then Speaker, John Bercow, cited Erskine May to rule that Theresa May could not repeatedly bring the same Brexit deal back to the Commons to be voted on unless it was “substantially” different.
The i news site reported that the text in question, which says a defeated motion cannot be brought back in the same form during the course of a parliamentary session, came from April 1604, in which Parliament concluded that “a question being once made, and carried in the affirmative or negative, cannot be questioned again, but must stand as a judgement of the House”.
-
Why more and more adults are reaching for soft toys
Under The Radar Does the popularity of the Squishmallow show Gen Z are 'scared to grow up'?
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Magazine solutions - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published
-
Magazine printables - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published
-
John Prescott: was he Labour's last link to the working class?
Today's Big Quesiton 'A total one-off': tributes have poured in for the former deputy PM and trade unionist
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Last hopes for justice for UK's nuclear test veterans
Under the Radar Thousands of ex-service personnel say their lives have been blighted by aggressive cancers and genetic mutations
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Donald Trump wreck the Brexit deal?
Today's Big Question President-elect's victory could help UK's reset with the EU, but a free-trade agreement with the US to dodge his threatened tariffs could hinder it
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is the next Tory leader up against?
Today's Big Question Kemi Badenoch or Robert Jenrick will have to unify warring factions and win back disillusioned voters – without alienating the centre ground
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is Lammy hoping to achieve in China?
Today's Big Question Foreign secretary heads to Beijing as Labour seeks cooperation on global challenges and courts opportunities for trade and investment
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Britain about to 'boil over'?
Today's Big Question A message shared across far-right groups listed more than 30 potential targets for violence in the UK today
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
UK's Starmer slams 'far-right thuggery' at riots
Speed Read The anti-immigrant violence was spurred by false rumors that the suspect in the Southport knife attack was an immigrant
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
For God and country: is religion in politics making a comeback?
Talking Point There are many MPs of faith in the new Labour government despite it being the most openly secular House of Commons in history
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published