Is the Gaza hostage deal a turning point in the war?
A temporary pause in hostilities will allow further aid to reach Gaza

Israel and Hamas have agreed to a deal that will see the release of 50 hostages being held in Gaza, as well as a four-day pause in fighting.
When it takes effect, it will be the first official cessation of the conflict since Hamas crossed the border into Israel on 7 October and killed 1,200 people as well as taking around 240 hostages. In exchange for the release of Israeli hostages, Palestinian prisoners in Israel will be freed and a temporary truce will allow more humanitarian aid to enter Gaza, where over 14,000 people have died. The pause in fighting is open for extension if Hamas releases more hostages.
While the deal represents a "major breakthrough" in the war, still the "question looms of what happens next to Gaza", wrote Jonathan Guyer at Vox, with Israel maintaining its joint objectives of freeing hostages and eliminating Hamas.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What the papers said
The deal does not signify a "resolution to the war" nor does it address the "roots of the conflict", added Guyer, but it remains a "significant development that's better than nothing". He suggests that "political dynamics" shifted Israel's position towards accepting a temporary truce, having initially prioritised its mission of destroying Hamas over bringing the hostages home.
A "high-profile" campaign by the hostages' families has put pressure on the Israeli government while "international pressure" in response to the deteriorating humanitarian situation in Gaza has also led to the acceptance of a temporary pause, said The Guardian.
The US played a "crucial role" in "shepherding" the deal across the line, said David Ignatius in The Washington Post, with Qatar "mediating", and support from Egypt on an agreement that has been in the works since October. But while "it could gradually expand to a broader de-escalation of the nightmare conflict", there is no sign of concession on Israel's "ultimate desire to destroy Hamas's political power in Gaza".
Though Israel will "face strong pressure not to resume" its operations after the truce ends, it may "not mean a permanent halt to the fight against Hamas" and it is unlikely the US will "press Israel to stop", with fears that it could "leave Hamas intact to menace Israel again", said The Economist.
The Guardian agreed that an indefinite ceasefire seems unlikely given Israel's "greater motives to return to the battlefield", while for Hamas, simply survival "as a group would represent a victory".
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been clear he expects fighting to resume, and has faced contrasting pressure from the far-right ministers in his coalition government and the Israeli public, which "overwhelmingly supports a deal to release hostages", said the Financial Times. Those ministers who voted against the deal on Tuesday said it would "not ensure the return of all the hostages and decreased the chances of destroying Hamas".
While the protests of hostages' families have become a "powerful force in Israel", the "structure of the deal could weaken Israel from various directions", said AP. The cessation will "give Hamas and its shadowy leader, Yehya Sinwar, a chance to regroup after suffering heavy losses", while pressure is likely to grow from the families of those hostages who were not released during this agreement to not "resume the offensive until their loved ones return home as well".
Even if the agreement does result in an indefinite ceasefire, Sinwar "will have little to celebrate", the AP added. Though he and the group may survive, he will "emerge to vast destruction that will take years, if not decades, to repair".
What next?
The start of the truce is set to be confirmed before the end of Thursday, but "right now, Gaza needs aid", said Guyer, with Israel set to allow in 300 trucks of aid per day during the agreement, as opposed to the daily average of 45 so far.
Once the initial agreement ends, Hamas "could seek to extend it by offering to gradually release more of the hostages", said The Guardian. But it is unclear to what extent, with the hostages remaining "Hamas's greatest leverage over Israel" and its key tool to "exploit the unavoidable tension in Israel's war plans", added The Economist.
But Israel is seemingly unlikely to allow the ceasefire to continue despite pressure, with a senior official telling The Washington Post that it cannot "allow Hamas to emerge from the tunnels, declare victory and rule over Gaza". "Toppling Hamas from power", added Ignatius, "evidently remains Israel's one non-negotiable demand".
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Richard Windsor is a freelance writer for The Week Digital. He began his journalism career writing about politics and sport while studying at the University of Southampton. He then worked across various football publications before specialising in cycling for almost nine years, covering major races including the Tour de France and interviewing some of the sport’s top riders. He led Cycling Weekly’s digital platforms as editor for seven of those years, helping to transform the publication into the UK’s largest cycling website. He now works as a freelance writer, editor and consultant.
-
Money dysmorphia: why people think they're poorer than they are
In The Spotlight Wealthy people and the young are more likely to have distorted perceptions
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK
-
Full-body scans: more panic than panacea?
The Explainer Hailed as the 'future of medicine' by some, but not all experts are convinced
By The Week UK
-
The Last of Us, series two: 'post-apocalyptic television at its peak'
The Week Recommends Second instalment of hit show is just as 'gutsy' and 'thoughtful' as the first
By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK
-
Could Trump's tariff war be his undoing with the GOP?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The catastrophic effects of the president's 'Liberation Day' tariffs might create a serious wedge between him and the rest of the Republican party
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US
-
Is Elon Musk's DOGE job coming to an end?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION Plummeting popularity, a stinging electoral defeat and Tesla's shrinking market share could be pulling the tech billionaire out of Trump's presidential orbit
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US
-
'The winners and losers of AI may not be where we expect'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US
-
Bombs or talks: What's next in the US-Iran showdown?
Talking Points US gives Tehran a two-month deadline to deal
By Joel Mathis, The Week US
-
Why are student loan borrowers falling behind on payments?
Today's Big Question Delinquencies surge as the Trump administration upends the program
By Joel Mathis, The Week US
-
What dangers does the leaked Signal chat expose the US to?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The White House's ballooning group chat scandal offered a masterclass in what not to say when prying eyes might be watching
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US
-
'Even authoritarian regimes need a measure of public support — the consent of at least some of the governed'
instant opinion 'Opinion, comment and editorials of the day'
By Anya Jaremko-Greenwold, The Week US
-
How are attorneys dealing with Trump's attacks on law firms?
Today's Big Question Trump has sanctioned the law firm that investigated his dealings with Stormy Daniels, among others
By Justin Klawans, The Week US