How would slavery reparations work?
Caribbean nations lead call for 'meaningful' conversations on compensation at Commonwealth summit

Keir Starmer is facing a growing clamour for Britain to pay slavery reparations, which some estimates say could exceed £200 billion.
At the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Samoa, a group of countries known as the Caribbean Community – or Caricom – have agreed to put reparations on the agenda. Noting "calls for discussions on reparatory justice", the 15 countries believe that "the time has come for a meaningful, truthful and respectful conversation towards forging a common future based on equity", according to a draft communique for the summit.
What did the commentators say?
The "philosophical arguments" for and against paying reparations tend to overshadow the "tricky" practicalities, said The Economist in 2020. Who would be eligible for reparations? How much should the payment be? And should it be paid to governments or to individuals?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
In Britain, experts have made "numerous estimations" for reparations amounts, said The Independent. Reverend Dr Michael Banner, the Dean of Trinity College, Cambridge, "hit headlines" this year claiming that Britain owed £205 billion. Last year, a report by Patrick Robinson, a leading judge at the International Court of Justice, said Britain should pay for its involvement in slavery in 14 countries and estimated the payout at about £18.8 trillion.
As to how reparations would be paid, direct payments "may do less to reduce inequality than their supporters hope", said The Economist. Big one-off payments cannot alone redress wider structural inequalities. That's why some economists argue that reparations should fund training and education programmes, and investment in businesses run by members of the affected communities.
But there's another sticking point: who decides the answers to any of those questions? And in that, we have a warning. In 2021 Germany pledged €1.1 billion (nearly £1 billion) to Namibia in "development aid" projects, to atone for its colonial genocide between 1904 and 1908. "The agreement was supposed to be a win-win," said Al Jazeera, but instead the affected Herero and Nama ethnic groups "vehemently opposed the agreement, saying it was dictated by Germany" and dismissed the offer as "insulting". The row, still ongoing, could "derail Germany's attempts to rid itself of decades of colonial guilt" and also "underscores the challenges of righting historical injustices in ways that are acceptable to, and inclusive of the very people who were wronged".
Compensation for slavery has actually been made before – but to slave owners, said Thomas Craemer, professor of public policy at the University of Connecticut, on The Conversation. After Britain abolished slavery in 1833, the Bank of England paid a compensation package to former slave owners with a loan totalling about £20 million – equivalent to roughly half the government's annual expenditure. The British taxpayer didn't finish paying off those loans until 2015; many generations were therefore saddled with "a reparations debt for which they were not personally responsible", said Craemer. And at the time, few complained that it was unfair.
What next?
Starmer has ruled out the prospect of reparations being discussed at the summit. But the issue is "in the mouths and on the minds of all participants", said Hilary Beckles, chairman of the Caricom Reparations Commission, in The Guardian. "The formal agenda does not determine the real agenda."
Support is building among African and Caribbean nations for "the creation of an international tribunal" on the transatlantic slave trade, said Reuters. This would be "modelled on other ad-hoc courts such as the Nuremberg trials of Nazi war criminals after World War Two".
Advocates within Caricom and the African Union (AU) are now developing a white paper on what reparations might look like. "We have a global community behind this message," said Jasmine Mickens, a US-based specialist in reparations. "That's something this movement has never seen before."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Harriet Marsden is a writer for The Week, mostly covering UK and global news and politics. Before joining the site, she was a freelance journalist for seven years, specialising in social affairs, gender equality and culture. She worked for The Guardian, The Times and The Independent, and regularly contributed articles to The Sunday Times, The Telegraph, The New Statesman, Tortoise Media and Metro, as well as appearing on BBC Radio London, Times Radio and “Woman’s Hour”. She has a master’s in international journalism from City University, London, and was awarded the "journalist-at-large" fellowship by the Local Trust charity in 2021.
-
Today's political cartoons - March 9, 2025
Cartoons Sunday's cartoons - proportional protests, shakedown diplomacy, and more
By The Week US Published
-
A wine-themed tour of beautiful Uruguay
The Week Recommends Secret paradise in South America boasts beautiful vineyards
By The Week UK Published
-
Romanian democracy: no place for the 'TikTok messiah' Calin Georgescu
Talking Point State is 'fighting back' against poster boy for right-wing conspiracists
By The Week UK Published
-
Why is MAGA turning on Amy Coney Barrett?
Today's Big Question She may be the swing vote on Trump cases
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Why is Trump's cryptocurrency reserve plan putting some economists on edge?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The president has named five cryptocurrencies he wants to see added to a federal stockpile as experts and lawmakers alike warn that the whole project could be a total flop
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
What is behind China's aggressive naval maneuvers near Australia?
Today's Big Question Live-fire drills are a test for Trump
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
What do Trump-supporting farmers make of his tariff and DOGE policies?
Today's Big Question A 'fresh element of worry' for agriculture
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Why are Republicans suddenly panicking about DOGE?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION As Trump and Musk take a chainsaw to the federal government, a growing number of Republicans worry that the massive cuts are hitting a little too close to home
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Who is actually running DOGE?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The White House said in a court filing that Elon Musk isn't the official head of Donald Trump's Department of Government Efficiency task force, raising questions about just who is overseeing DOGE's federal blitzkrieg
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
How will Keir Starmer pay for greater defence spending?
Today's Big Question Funding for courts, prisons, local government and the environment could all be at risk
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Why are Europe's leaders raising red flags about Trump's Ukraine overtures to Putin?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION Officials from across the continent warn that any peace plan without their input is doomed from the start
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published