TURKEY’S attempt to ban Twitter has been condemned by the United States as the modern equivalent of burning books. However, the government in Ankara has defended the policy, saying no global company is “above the law”.
Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan imposed the ban two days ago after Twitter was used to post links to recordings that appear to incriminate him and colleagues in corruption. In one audio clip, a man thought to be Erdogan allegedly tells his son to hide cash from police investigators.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The Turkish Twitter ban has been ridiculed at home and abroad as being both heavy-handed and ineffectual. Usage of the website has soared since the ban was imposed as Turks have found ways around it; even the president, Abdullah Gul, managed to circumvent the blockage to tweet his disapproval.
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton tweeted yesterday: “The freedom to speak out and to connect is a fundamental right. The people of Turkey deserve that right restored.”
That followed the publication of a blog post by the State Department which described internet censorship as “21st-century book burning”, adding: “A friend like Turkey has nothing to fear in the free-flow of ideas and even criticism represented by Twitter. Its attempt to block its citizens’ access to social media tools should be reversed.”
But the Turkish government has stood by its ban. Finance minister Mehmet Simsek admitted to the BBC that the decision did not “reflect well” on his government, but said Twitter had refused to comply with court orders to remove content.
"I don't think any global company, whether it's a media company, whether it's an industrial company, it shouldn't see itself [as being] above the law," he said.
-
'A symbol of the faceless corporate desire'Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Say farewell to summer at these underrated US lakesThe Week Recommends Have one last blast
-
Truck drivers are questioning the Trump administration's English mandateTalking Points Some have praised the rules, others are concerned they could lead to profiling
-
China is silently expanding its influence in American citiesUnder the Radar New York City and San Francisco, among others, have reportedly been targeted
-
How China uses 'dark fleets' to circumvent trade sanctionsThe Explainer The fleets are used to smuggle goods like oil and fish
-
One year after mass protests, why are Kenyans taking to the streets again?today's big question More than 60 protesters died during demonstrations in 2024
-
Kurdish PKK militia to disband for Turkey talksspeed read The Kurdistan Workers' Party will disarm after four decades of armed conflict with Turkey, putting an end to 'one of the longest insurgencies in the Middle East'
-
What happens if tensions between India and Pakistan boil over?TODAY'S BIG QUESTION As the two nuclear-armed neighbors rattle their sabers in the wake of a terrorist attack on the contested Kashmir region, experts worry that the worst might be yet to come
-
Why Russia removed the Taliban's terrorist designationThe Explainer Russia had designated the Taliban as a terrorist group over 20 years ago
-
Inside the Israel-Turkey geopolitical dance across SyriaTHE EXPLAINER As Syria struggles in the wake of the Assad regime's collapse, its neighbors are carefully coordinating to avoid potential military confrontations
-
'Like a sound from hell': Serbia and sonic weaponsThe Explainer Half a million people sign petition alleging Serbian police used an illegal 'sound cannon' to disrupt anti-government protests
