Should Twitter have the power to ban Donald Trump’s account?
Critics describe the move as ‘censorship’ based on ‘political preferences’
World leaders including Angela Merkel are wading into the row over Twitter’s decision to ban Donald Trump from the social media platform after his supporters stormed Capitol Hill last week.
“The right to freedom of opinion is of fundamental importance,” a spokesperson for the German leader told reporters yesterday. “Given that, the chancellor considers it problematic that the president’s accounts have been permanently suspended.”
The ban on Trump has fuelled a long-running debate about social media regulation. As CNBC notes, one of the key issues is “whether these companies should be treated as publishers rather than tech firms - meaning they would be more accountable for the content available on their platforms”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Trump and some US legislators have previously called for an end to Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which blocks liability claims in America against social media companies for users’ posts on their sites.
But while “Section 230 was seen as a protection of free speech”, says the news site, Twitter’s veto on the president has triggered fears that platforms may ban other voices, in response to political, social or financial pressure.
In a post on Twitter, Russian opposition leader Alexey Navalny writes that the Trump ban is “an unacceptable act of censorship” that was “based on emotions and personal political preferences”.
Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador has also “blasted” the move as a “bad sign” that private companies have the power to censor opinions, Al Jazeera reports.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
“I don’t like anybody being censored or taking away from the right to post a message on Twitter or Facebook,” Obrador said during a regular news conference on Friday.
“A court of censorship like the Inquisition to manage public opinion - this is really serious.”
Other critics have argued that “in a world where Donald Trump is banned from social media for inciting hate, so too should be Philippine’s President Rodrigo Duterte”, says Quartz.
Duterte has used Twitter to call for vigilantes to take violent action against drug dealers, yet like “India’s political elite who promote communal violence”, is allowed to continue spreading his message online.
Not everyone is convinced that Twitter has made the wrong call in singling out Trump, however.
The Independent’s opinion editor Chris Stevenson insists that “there is no legal responsibility for any privately-owned platform to host the president’s views” - and points out that the outgoing president still has plenty of other ways to air his views.
With the “White House press pack in attendance”, if Trump “wants something put out there, millions will be able to see or hear it”, says Stevenson.
Chas Newkey-Burden has been part of The Week Digital team for more than a decade and a journalist for 25 years, starting out on the irreverent football weekly 90 Minutes, before moving to lifestyle magazines Loaded and Attitude. He was a columnist for The Big Issue and landed a world exclusive with David Beckham that became the weekly magazine’s bestselling issue. He now writes regularly for The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Independent, Metro, FourFourTwo and the i new site. He is also the author of a number of non-fiction books.
-
States sue TikTok over children's mental health
Speed Read The lawsuit was filed by 13 states and Washington, D.C.
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
The 'loyalty testers' who can check a partner's fidelity
Under The Radar The history of 'honey-trapping goes back a long way'
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Elon Musk's X blinks in standoff with Brazil
Speed Read Brazil may allow X to resume operations in the country, as Musk's company agrees to comply with court demand
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Pakistan 'gaslighting' citizens over sudden internet slowdown
Under the Radar Government accused of 'throttling the internet' and spooking businesses with China-style firewall, but minister blames widespread use of VPNs
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Threads turns one: where does the Twitter rival stand?
In the Spotlight Although Threads is reporting 175 million active monthly users, it has failed to eclipse X as a meaningful cultural force
By Keumars Afifi-Sabet, The Week UK Published
-
The growing dystopian AI influencer economy
In the Spotlight AI-generated digital personas are giving human influencers a run for their money
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Social media could come with a warning label
Talking Points Do Facebook and TikTok need the notifications that come on cigarettes?
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
What happens if TikTok is banned?
Today's Big Question Many are fearful that TikTok's demise could decimate the content creator community
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published