Brexit glossary: from max fac and Chequers to Norway and Canada +++
The Week's guide to all the jargon you need to know as the UK gets set to exit the EU
The language of Brexit has proven almost as complicated as the process itself, with the House of Commons library even seeking a specialist Brexit editor to make sense of it all.
With less than six months to go before Britain leaves the EU, “the post has been created to give MPs and their staff the ‘information they need to scrutinise the Brexit process’ and help them make ‘well-informed decisions’”, according to The Times.
Here is just some of the jargon the new Commons employee will have to get their head around and some concise definitions by The Week:
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Article 50
This is the formal mechanism for exiting the EU: the clause in the 2007 Lisbon treaty that allows any member state “to withdraw from the union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements”.
Withdrawal agreement
The UK and EU are negotiating a withdrawal agreement that will cover all parts of Britain's exit from the bloc, including the divorce financial settlement (or “Brexit bill”), Irish border and citizens' rights. It is “separate from any treaty on the UK's future relationship with the bloc, with the withdrawal agreement to be voted on by MPs at the end of the Brexit process”, says Sky News.
Canada +++ or Super Canada model
This potential model of Brexit, favoured by Boris Johnson and the hardline Brexiteers, is a free trade agreement like the one Canada has with the EU, but better (hence +++). Goods traded between the UK and EU have to be checked at the border but there wouldn’t be any import taxes. Brexiteers “want it because it takes the UK out of the EU’s orbit compared to now”, says The Independent, but it is not supported by Theresa May.
Norway model
Favoured by soft-Brexiteers, the Norway model offers an example of what it’s like to remain in the single market, but not be in the EU. The government's own impact assessment found the Norway option would be the least damaging in terms of economic harm but it would involve the UK being a member of the European Economic Area (EEA) and thereby accepting freedom of movement and laws of the market that are made in Brussels.
Chequers plan
Theresa May’s Brexit plan named after the Prime Minister's country residence, where it was agreed at a meeting of the Cabinet in July. It includes a “common rulebook” for all goods traded with the EU and a “facilitated customs arrangement”, which aims to maintain frictionless trade in goods but not services or workers, dividing the four freedoms of the EU which have remained the bloc’s red lines in negotiations.
Irish backstop
The backstop is a position of last resort and has been needed for the thorny issue of the Irish border. The challenge has been to find an arrangement that doesn’t derail the peace process by creating a hard border between Ireland and Northern Ireland or between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK. May “wants a backstop that would see the whole of the UK staying in the customs union for a limited period of time after the transition period, something the EU has said is unacceptable”, says the BBC.
Max fac
“Max fac” - short for “maximum facilitation” - is a proposed customs system that “would rely on technological checks to maintain an open border” in Ireland, explains PoliticsHome. It is favoured by Brexiteers but critics say it would not solve the Irish border question as there would still need to be tariff checks on the border, a red line for the Irish government.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Today's political cartoons - October 5, 2024
Cartoons Saturday's cartoons - gathering funds, juggling tariffs, and more
By The Week US Published
-
5 category 5 cartoons about hurricane Helene
Artists take on precarious conditions, planning ahead, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Wolfs: 'comedy thriller' stumbles despite George Clooney and Brad Pitt
While the crime caper might 'pleasingly pass a Saturday night' its star-studded duo cannot ultimately salvage it
By The Week UK Published
-
Why is Germany cracking down on migration?
Today's Big Question New border rules test the European Union
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Is Britain about to 'boil over'?
Today's Big Question A message shared across far-right groups listed more than 30 potential targets for violence in the UK today
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
UK's Starmer slams 'far-right thuggery' at riots
Speed Read The anti-immigrant violence was spurred by false rumors that the suspect in the Southport knife attack was an immigrant
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The Tamils stranded on 'secretive' British island in Indian Ocean
Under the Radar Migrants 'unlawfully detained' since 2021 shipwreck on UK-controlled Diego Garcia, site of important US military base
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Britain's Labour Party wins in a landslide
Speed Read The Conservatives were unseated after 14 years of rule
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
'Always played the game with enthusiasm'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Will voter apathy and low turnout blight the election?
Today's Big Question Belief that result is 'foregone conclusion', or that politicians can't be trusted, could exacerbate long-term turnout decline
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published