Did China have four times more coronavirus cases than it reported?

Academics suggest shifting definition of Covid-19 may have obscured the number of infections

China coronavirus
Beds at an exhibition centre that was converted into a hospital in Wuhan
(Image credit: STR/AFP via Getty Images)

The true number of people infected in the first wave of coronavirus in China may be four times the official figures, according to researchers.

Mainland China reported more than 55,000 cases as of 20 February but, according to research published in medical journal the Lancet, the figure may be closer to more than 232,000.

Academics at Hong Kong University’s school of public health say that the discrepancy could have been avoided if “the definition of a Covid-19 case that was later used had been applied from the outset”, according to The Guardian.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Latest figures say that China has had 83,876 cases. But can we trust China’s official reporting?

Is China telling the truth?

Beijing has faced considerable criticism over its handling of the crisis, which has also seen complaints levelled at the World Health Organization for its willingness to trust China’s coronavirus figures.

The estimates made by Hong Kong university puts more pressure on China over its official reporting. The study points out that the country’s national health commission issued seven different versions of a case definition for Covid-19 between 15 January and 3 March.

“If the fifth version of the case definition had been applied throughout the outbreak with sufficient testing capacity, we estimated that by 20 February 2020, there would have been 232,000… confirmed cases in China as opposed to the 55,508 confirmed cases reported,” the study says.

Larry Kudlow, director of the US National Economic Council, told White House reporters in February that he was “disappointed” by China’s apparent opaqueness around its handling of the outbreak.

“We are a little disappointed that we haven’t been invited in and we’re a little disappointed in the lack of transparency coming from the Chinese,” Kudlow said.

In a statement released last week, officials in Wuhan raised the city's official Covid-19 death toll by 50%, adding 1,290 fatalities. Wuhan officials attributed the new figure to updated reporting and deaths outside hospitals, insisting there was not an attempted cover-up.

Deaths linked to the virus outside hospitals, such as people who died at home, had not previously been recorded. This echoes the criticisms in the UK that deaths inside care homes are not being included in the government’s daily figures.

The “statistical verification” followed efforts by authorities to “ensure that information on the city’s Covid-19 epidemic is open, transparent and the data [is] accurate”, the BBC reports the statement as saying.

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For a round-up of the most important stories from around the world - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Start your trial subscription today –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

What about other countries?

Iran has almost 86,000 cases of the virus and more than 5,000 deaths 5,000 deaths, according to Johns Hopkins University data, making it one of the most heavily impacted nations in the world.

Iranian officials including President Hassan Rouhani have repeatedly “dismissed concerns raised by many Iranians over the handling of the outbreak, saying all the necessary measures to overcome the crisis have been taken”, reports Reuters.

The BBC, however, notes that there is “concern the true scale of the virus is being downplayed by the government and could rapidly get much worse”.

In a wide-ranging report on Iran’s handling of the crisis, the BBC says that doctors from three of the worst-hit provinces in Iran - Gilan, Golestan and Mazandarn - have said that there are “very few coronavirus testing kits, and medical supplies are limited.

This includes basic medicines, oxygen tanks, sterilised masks and protective scrubs and gloves”, indicating that Iran may be incapable of quelling a full-blown outbreak.

And North Korea?

Pyongyang’s insistence via state media that no one in North Korea is infected with coronavirus - despite the country’s lengthy border with China - has been met with scepticism by health experts.

South Korean news site Daily NK reported early in March that sources in the North claim that that virus may have killed dozens of people there since January.

“Sources say that the authorities are keeping statistics about people who have died with related symptoms or who are being quarantined, but that the information is being kept secret,” the site says.

As the BBC notes, North Korea is seen as “highly vulnerable to infectious diseases, and its healthcare system ill-equipped to deal with them”, meaning that an outbreak “would be devastating for a population already suffering from malnourishment and poor health”.

Continue reading for free

We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.

Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.