Are Ukraine's F-16 fighter jets too little too late?
US-made aircraft are 'significant improvement' on Soviet-era weaponry but long delay and lack of trained pilots could undo advantage against Russia
The long-awaited arrival of American F-16 fighter jets in Ukraine marks "a new chapter" in the war against Russia.
So said Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Sunday, confirming for the first time that the aircraft had started operations against Russian forces. "We often heard the answer that it was impossible," the Ukrainian president said during the unveiling ceremony for the country's Air Force Day. "Now it is a reality."
Kyiv has been urging its Nato allies to provide the supersonic "Fighting Falcons" jets since the early days of the war. The so-called F-16 coalition of European nations – led by Denmark and the Netherlands, and including Belgium and Norway – promised to send 79, but had to await US approval for the export, which the Biden administration granted only last August. Training pilots to use the aircraft has since taken months.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"I am proud of our guys who are mastering these jets and have already started using them for our country," Zelenskyy said, thanking allies. "It's good that they are here and that we can put them to use."
What did the commentators say?
It was a "pivotal moment for Ukraine", said CNBC, as Zelenskyy watched two F-16s "roar overhead". Kyiv has "repeatedly requested" the aircraft and Ukraine hopes they will "change the dial" in the war. "F-16s bring just and lasting peace closer," Zelenskyy said earlier this year.
They do "offer a significant improvement" to jets Ukraine inherited from the USSR, said CNN. They can provide air cover for ground troops and critical infrastructure, or attack Russian targets and enemy planes.
Their arrival is "better late than never", said The Economist. Although numbers are "too few", their importance "should not be underestimated". The immediate impact will be a "boost to morale". They could also "lessen the impunity" with which Russian glide-bomb aircrafts have been "pummelling Ukraine's front lines"; the Russian aircrafts' range means they don't have to leave Russian airspace and risk being shot down. The F-16s can use cheaper heat-seeking missiles to take out those munitions.
However, there has been a "pitiful" lack of training slots for Ukrainian pilots. F-16s are very different and more complex than the aircraft they know.
Zelenskyy declined to specify "the numbers involved", said the Kyiv Post. But he admitted that the number of jets and trained pilots is "not enough". Far from it. The Ukrainian army will only be able to use a handful of jets in combat at a time, as two pilots are needed for each plane.
Ukrainian officials also warned that the long delay in delivering the F-16s could have allowed Russia time to adapt its tactics. Indeed, Russia has already benefited, said Robert Clark, director of defence and security at Civitas, in The Telegraph.
The Russian offensive around Kharkiv this year put "immense pressure" on Ukraine's defensive lines. Russia sought to "capitalise" on that with "devastating" missile and drone attacks on civilians and infrastructure – even schools and hospitals. Meanwhile, politicians "dithered and delayed time and again" with "pointless discussions" about Russian escalation. Western lawmakers "insist on the political luxury of time" – which Ukrainian frontline troops "pay for in blood".
"The sad truth is that this war could have been won a long time ago," said Clark. It may now never be won unless the West can "find its collective courage" and send Ukraine the weapons it needs, before it's too late.
What next?
Ukraine should be flying 20 of the fighter jets by the end of 2024. "Many of our men are currently studying and training," said Zelenskyy. Western allies will "find an opportunity to expand the training platform for our pilots and engineers".
Most of the remaining jets are expected in batches throughout 2025. But some may be in such poor condition that they will serve as nothing more than a source of spare parts, said The Economist. Ukraine needs 12 or more squadrons of 18 planes each to achieve air superiority – at least 216, according to the Centre for Strategic and International Studies.
The F-16s will be "shot down and destroyed", said Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov. "There is no 'magic pill' here. There is no panacea," he told reporters, according to Russian state news agency Tass.
F-16s "should not be viewed as a game-changing weapon", Mykola Bielieskov, a research fellow at the National Institute for Strategic Studies think tank, concluded in an analysis for the Atlantic Council. They cannot "change the course of the war".
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Harriet Marsden is a writer for The Week, mostly covering UK and global news and politics. Before joining the site, she was a freelance journalist for seven years, specialising in social affairs, gender equality and culture. She worked for The Guardian, The Times and The Independent, and regularly contributed articles to The Sunday Times, The Telegraph, The New Statesman, Tortoise Media and Metro, as well as appearing on BBC Radio London, Times Radio and “Woman’s Hour”. She has a master’s in international journalism from City University, London, and was awarded the "journalist-at-large" fellowship by the Local Trust charity in 2021.
-
How can you save on homeowners insurance?
The Explainer With the rise in extreme weather, house protection is a non-negotiable
By Becca Stanek, The Week US Published
-
Donald Trump is downplaying his position on abortion
The Explainer He says it's a state issue, but opponents have concerns
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
5 spellbinding new books to read in October. Witches and colonization tales included.
The Week Recommends Ta-Nehisi Coates shines a light on Palestine, and Louise Erdrich takes us to North Dakota
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Middle East crisis: is there really a diplomatic path forward?
Today's Big Question Recent escalation between Israel and Hezbollah might have dented US influence in the conflict
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Mossad's history with explosive technology
The Explainer Infamous Israeli spy agency has not claimed responsibility for Hezbollah's exploding pagers but has 'decades-long' list of remote assassinations
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What happens if Russia declares war on Nato?
Today's Big Question Fears are growing after Vladimir Putin's 'unusually specific warning' to Western governments
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Missile escalation: will long-range rockets make a difference to Ukraine?
Today's Big Question Kyiv is hoping for permission to use US missiles to strike deep into Russian territory
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
Atesh: the Ukrainian partisans taking on Russia
Under The Radar Underground resistance fighters are risking their lives to defend their country
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Iran and Israel: is all-out war inevitable?
Talking Points Tehran has vowed revenge for assassinations of Hamas and Hezbollah leaders, but Gaza ceasefire could offer way out
By The Week UK Published
-
'Second only to a nuclear bomb' – the controversial arms Russia is using in Ukraine
The Explainer Thermobaric bombs 'capable of vaporising human bodies' have been used against Ukraine
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-