THE GUARDIAN has published the full report into union manipulation of the selection of the Labour candidate in last year’s Falkirk by-election – just a few hours before Ed Miliband asks the party's National Executive Committee to endorse his latest plans for reforming the party’s trade union links.
The report into alleged vote-rigging at Falkirk was suppressed by Miliband to limit the wider fallout on the party but prompted him to announce his plan last year to reform the way unions finance the Labour Party through the political levy. He is now proposing to go much further by changing the system to elect the party leader to one member one vote.
It amounts to the biggest change in Labour since Tony Blair abolished Clause Four of the party's constitution committing the party to public ownership, and it is being resisted by trade unionists and some Labour MPs who fear breaking the link with the unions.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Suspicions have been raised at the timing of the leak to The Guardian – because by exposing what happened at Falkirk it could help Miliband carry through his controversial reforms. BBC political correspondent Norman Smith tweeted this morning that Labour sources have denied "leaking Falkirk report to coincide with today's NEC meeting to approve Ed Miliband's union reforms". Perhaps they protest too much.
The 21-page Falkirk report concludes with eight damning findings including this: there was “no doubt that members were recruited in an attempt to manipulate party processes”.
The inquiry also found evidence that members were recruited without their knowledge, that "signatures were forged" and that deliberate attempts were made to frustrate interviews by the inquiry.
The Falkirk by-election came about because of a punch-up in a Commons bar which led to the removal of the sitting Labour MP, Eric Joyce. This created the vacancy which the Unite union sought to exploit as part of a publicly declared campaign to get more Unite-linked Labour candidates in Parliament and generally to create more working-class Labour MPs.
Police decided last summer not to take the matter further and Labour Party officials announced there was no proof of wrong-doing as the key evidence had been withdrawn. Unite members involved in the selection process continue to deny any wrong-doing and claim the inquiry report is flawed.
So what exactly will Miliband be pushing for at today’s meeting of Labour’s National Executive Committee?
His proposed leadership election system would replace the electoral college in which MPs, constituencies and unions each had a third of the vote (Ed Miliband had fewer MPs voting for him than his brother David but grabbed the crown by winning the trade union section).
Under Miliband’s plan, MPs would have sole nomination rights for leadership candidates and those candidates would need the backing of 15 per cent of Labour MPs to run. All union members would have to “double opt-in” if they wanted to vote in the leadership contest. They would have to say that they are content to give money to Labour and that they want to become “an affiliated supporter”. Only full party members - not trade union “affiliated supporters” - would choose parliamentary and council candidates.
The Observer carried a helpful guide to ‘Project Miliband’ on Sunday, covering the gurus (Michael E Porter Dominic Barton MD of McKinsey, Paul Polman CEO of Unilever), the key players (aides Stewart Wood, Stan Greenberg, Arnie Graf, and Richard Lloyd of consumer champion Which?) and the essential books to read (The Bully Pulpit, a biography of Teddy Roosevelt by Doris Kearns Goodwin and Varieties of Capitalism by Peter Hall and David Soskice). Miliband may want the internal report into Falkirk added to this "must-read" list to convince his party the reforms are necessary.
-
August 23 editorial cartoonsCartoons Saturday's political cartoons include deficit dimness, steamroller-in-chief, and more
-
5 museum-grade cartoons about Trump's Smithsonian purgeCartoons Artists take on institutional rebranding, exhibit interpretation, and more
-
Settling the West Bank: a death knell for a Palestine state?In the Spotlight The reality on the ground is that the annexation of the West Bank is all but a done deal
-
Who will win the battle for the soul of the Green Party?An ideological divide is taking root among the environmentalists
-
Are we facing a summer of riots?Today's Big Question Anti-immigrant unrest in Essex has sparked fears of a summer of disorder
-
Who stands to gain – and lose – from 16-year-old voters?Today's Big Question Many assume Labour will benefit but move could 'backfire' if Greens, a new hard-left party or Reform continue to pick up momentum
-
What difference will the 'historic' UK-Germany treaty make?Today's Big Question Europe's two biggest economies sign first treaty since WWII, underscoring 'triangle alliance' with France amid growing Russian threat and US distance
-
Mortgage reform: is Rachel Reeves betting the house on City rules shake-up?Today's Big Question Reforms could create up to 36,000 additional mortgages next year
-
Corbynism returns: a new party on the LeftTalking Point Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana's breakaway progressive party has already got off to a shaky start
-
How will Labour pay for welfare U-turn?Today's Big Question A dramatic concession to Labour rebels has left the government facing more fiscal dilemmas
-
Backbench rebellions and broken promises: is it getting harder to govern?Today's Big Question Backbench rebellions and broken promises: is it getting harder to govern?
