Covid inquiry: is the government attempting a cover-up?
Cabinet Office accused of ‘cowardly’ bid to obstruct the official investigation

The prime minister has been accused of attempting a “cover-up” as he tries to block the Covid inquiry’s request for Boris Johnson’s unredacted WhatsApp messages and notebooks.
After the Cabinet Office launched an unprecedented High Court bid to avoid handing over the material, opposition politicians accused Rishi Sunak of a “cowardly” attempt to obstruct the inquiry.
The department said it was bringing the legal challenge “with regret”, but insisted that “important issues of principle” were at stake. It claimed that the request by the inquiry amounted to an “unwarranted intrusion” into other aspects of government work, as well as into “expectations of privacy”.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“The public deserve answers, not another cover-up,” said Labour’s deputy leader Angela Rayner. But which are we most likely to get?
What did the papers say?
“I fear we are witnessing a Covid cover-up,” said Karol Sikora in The Telegraph.
“The person with cancer now incurable because of unjustified delays” and “the families forced to say their final goodbye to loved ones over a mobile phone” are among those who “deserve pandemic answers”, said the physician.
However, he fears “that we are seeing the beginnings of a great Covid cover-up, a disastrous whitewash”, because the inquiry “may not overcome the force of a pro-lockdown establishment closing ranks to protect itself”.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
By seeking a judicial review, Sunak “looks as if he has something to hide”, said The Independent. The PM has “constructed an elegant political trap for himself, thereby making the very worst of a delicate situation”, it added.
The former chief prosecutor, Nazir Afzal, tweeted that “if it looks like an attempted cover-up, smells like an attempted cover-up, then guess what…”. Earlier this week, the former head of the civil service joined the chorus. Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s “Today” programme, Lord Kerslake said: “There’s some cover-up going on here to save embarrassment of ministers”, HuffPost reported.
The inquiry is not expected to conclude its public hearings until the summer of 2026, noted William Atkinson in The Spectator, with “subjects such as Covid contracts and decisions on care homes not tackled until 2025”.
“This may be good news for Johnson, Hancock, and any other ex-minister worried about having their records publicly scrutinised”, but “it is terrible news for anyone who wants to learn the truth”, he said.
“Voters are expected to go to the polls next year without having heard about the most important decisions the Conservatives made in office,” he added. “How does that enable the public to hold those responsible to account?”
The government argues that handing over some of the Johnson material without redactions “could set a problematic precedent – damaging its ability to have private policy discussions without fear of disclosure”, explained the Institute for Government.
However, countered the think tank, “the more dangerous precedent is that document-holders and potential witnesses get to decide what is relevant to an inquiry, rather than the independent inquiry chair”.
What next?
A legal decision on the contested material is expected soon. The judicial review should be “pretty quick” with a hearing in “a small number of weeks” – even as soon as next week, Jonathan Jones, a former permanent secretary of the government legal department, told Politico.
A ruling would then be expected to be handed down within “weeks or days” but the news site noted that either side “could yet head to the Court of Appeal if the battle over redactions doesn’t go their way”.
The government is likely to lose the case, said science minister George Freeman. But, speaking on the BBC’s “Question Time”, he added that “people’s privacy is really important” and the question of how private correspondence should be handled was a “point worth testing”.
Writing in The New Statesman, former Tory MP David Gauke wondered whether Sunak’s authority may be damaged by his decision to side with Johnson. “When he first became Prime Minister”, Sunak “promised to uphold the values of integrity, professionalism and accountability”, wrote Gauke. But “he has given the impression of seeking to protect Johnson and appease his supporters, looked evasive” and will “sooner or later lose this battle”.
Sunak can “try to keep Johnson onside or he can demonstrate his commitment to integrity, professionalism and accountability”, said Gauke. “He cannot do both.”
Chas Newkey-Burden has been part of The Week Digital team for more than a decade and a journalist for 25 years, starting out on the irreverent football weekly 90 Minutes, before moving to lifestyle magazines Loaded and Attitude. He was a columnist for The Big Issue and landed a world exclusive with David Beckham that became the weekly magazine’s bestselling issue. He now writes regularly for The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Independent, Metro, FourFourTwo and the i new site. He is also the author of a number of non-fiction books.
-
Trump reignites Jan. 6 furor by awarding military honors to killed rioter
IN THE SPOTLIGHT With military funeral honors for Ashli Babbitt, the president makes good on campaign promises designed to animate his political base while relitigating history
-
'Is it OK to be happy when the world is falling apart?'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Will online age checks doom internet freedom?
Today's Big Question Or do they protect children from harm?
-
Did Trump just push India into China's arms?
Today's Big Question Tariffs disrupt American efforts to align with India
-
Why is Trump suddenly interested in his enemies' mortgages?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION As the president continues targeting adversaries, he's turned to a surprising ally to provide ammunition for an emerging line of attack
-
What are blue slips and why does Trump want to end them?
Today's Big Question The practice lets senators block a president's judge and prosecutor nominees
-
Inflation derailed Biden. Is Trump next?
Today's Big Question 'Financial anxiety' rises among voters
-
Why has the State Department scaled down its stance on human rights?
Today's Big Question The Trump administration has curtailed previous criticisms of human rights violations
-
Why do Dana White and Donald Trump keep pushing for a White House UFC match?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The president and the sports mogul each have their own reasons for wanting a White House spectacle
-
Why is Trump attacking Intel's CEO?
Today's Big Question Concerns about Lip-Bu Tan's Chinese connections
-
Will Trump privatize Social Security?
Today's Big Question Bessent calls savings program a 'back door' to privatization