Merz's coalition deal: a 'betrayal' of Germany?
With liberalism, freedom and democracy under threat globally, it's a time for 'giants' – but this is a 'coalition of the timid'
So much for Germany's "radical" new direction, said Ralf Neukirch in Der Spiegel (Hamburg). When the incoming chancellor, Friedrich Merz, won the election in February, he promised to be bold and brave: to tighten our borders, unshackle our low-growth economy, bolster our defences, and wean us off our dependence on the United States. Last week, on the same day that the far-right AfD topped a national poll for the first time, the CDU leader unveiled his coalition deal with the SPD – and it was full of the same tired old policies: no military conscription; no social and tax reform; no major migration measures.
The centre-left SPD got something for pensioners, while Merz's centre-right CDU/CSU alliance walked away with gifts to farmers and entrepreneurs. "A perfectly normal coalition agreement, in other words. Only these aren't normal times." With war raging in Europe, the far-right on the rise and the US intent on destroying the global economic order, we need our leaders to be courageous. Instead, we have a "coalition of the timid".
OK, so Merz's new agreement is "hardly revolutionary", said Jan Frédéric Willems in Tagesschau (Hamburg). But his most radical measure came before the coalition agreement, when he upended decades of fiscal convention and released Germany's debt brake – unleashing a more than €500 billion bazooka of defence and infrastructure spending. Combine this multibillion-euro injection with a calm policy plan, and "a lot can be achieved".
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Perhaps that kind of quiet, pragmatic approach is what voters want: in a world where Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump are sowing chaos, a little bit of sobriety and stability starts to look appealing. That's why last week's announcement was so low-key compared with that of Olaf Scholz's previous "traffic light" coalition, said Thomas Sigmund in Handelsblatt (Düsseldorf). They unveiled their own deal in 2021 with "beaming selfies" and an over-the-top slogan of "Dare More Progress". "In the end, little more remained of the 'progressive coalition' than a pile of rubble." Merz's coalition has sensibly chosen the more subdued "Responsibility for Germany".
Besides, Merz has managed to secure some important wins, said Volksstimme (Magdeburg), including a reduction in corporate tax, and returning the minimum residency requirement for obtaining German citizenship from three years to five. But it's nowhere near enough, said Henry Donovan in The Spectator (London). During the campaign, Merz promised centre-right voters that he would reverse Angela Merkel's "leftward drift"; yet this agreement "might as well be written in red ink". It's full of SPD policies, although the centre-left party has just suffered one of its worst election defeats, winning only 16% of the vote.
Immigration is fuelling AfD's ascendance, and yet the coalition's central promise in this area – to turn asylum seekers back at the border – is empty, as it depends on the unlikely cooperation of other countries. Coming on top of Merz's debt-fuelled spending splurge, the deal has "formalised the most spectacular betrayal of centre-right voters in modern German history". It's a gift the AfD "could scarcely have hoped for".
It had barely begun, but the honeymoon is definitely over for Merz, said James Angelos on Politico (Brussels). His approval ratings have plunged ten points since the election. The world needs Germany's new leader to succeed, said Tagesspiegel (Berlin). The stakes are incredibly high – both domestically, where Merz's coalition is the only thing standing between the AfD and power, and globally, given our country's economic and military weight in Europe. With liberalism, freedom and democracy under threat, it's a time for "giants" – yet sadly we have no Helmut Kohl, no Gerhard Schröder, no Merkel. All of them have experience of governing during international crises. Our incoming chancellor and his coalition partners do not. "Their learning curve must be steeper than anyone's before."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Will Democrats impeach Kristi Noem?Today’s Big Question Centrists, lefty activists also debate abolishing ICE
-
Is a social media ban for teens the answer?Talking Point Australia is leading the charge in banning social media for people under 16 — but there is lingering doubt as to the efficacy of such laws
-
Magazine crossword: 1499Puzzles The weekly crossword from The Week
-
Venezuela: The ‘Donroe doctrine’ takes shapeFeature President Trump wants to impose “American dominance”
-
Minnesota fraud: Walz takes the hitFeature Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz will not seek re-election due to state welfare fraud scandal
-
MAGA: The battle over ‘Heritage Americans’Feature Blood-and-soil nationalism is roiling MAGA world
-
EU-Mercosur mega trade deal: 25 years in the makingThe Explainer Despite opposition from France and Ireland among others, the ‘significant’ agreement with the South American bloc is set to finally go ahead
-
Maduro’s capture: two hours that shook the worldTalking Point Evoking memories of the US assault on Panama in 1989, the manoeuvre is being described as the fastest regime change in history
-
Unrest in Iran: how the latest protests spread like wildfireIn the Spotlight Deep-rooted discontent at the country’s ‘entire regime’ and economic concerns have sparked widespread protest far beyond Tehran
-
Trump pulls US from key climate pact, other bodiesSpeed Read The White House removed dozens of organizations from US participation
-
What is the Donroe Doctrine?The Explainer Donald Trump has taken a 19th century US foreign policy and turbocharged it