Explained: the rent expenses ‘loophole’ used by MPs to pocket taxpayer cash
Two Labour lawmakers and 15 Tories claimed total of £1.3m for rental costs while letting out own properties

A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
Thank you for signing up to TheWeek. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.
MPs including five government ministers are using the parliamentary expenses scheme to cover rental payments while making at least £10,000 a year each letting out properties in London, an investigation has found.
An analysis by The Independent of expenses claims found that over the past five years, a total of 17 MPs have used a loophole to claim a total of more than £1.3m in taxpayer-funded cash.
The findings have prompted anger and calls for reform as Boris Johnson's government “faces growing pressure over a deluge of ‘sleaze’ claims”, said the paper.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
‘Makes no sense’
According to The Times, “many of the MPs who benefit from the system are themselves highly critical of it and claim that they have been pushed into the arrangement” by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa). “They say that ultimately it costs taxpayers more,” the paper continued.
The loophole was created in 2010, when the expenses watchdog banned MPs from claiming mortgage interest payments following a separate expenses scandal. The move was “intended to stop them from making capital gains on taxpayer-funded properties”.
Ipsa said the new rules would only allow MPs to claim for “rental payments and associated costs”.
Some MPs who already owned London properties criticised the crackdown on mortgage expenses, arguing that they were being forced to subsidise the cost of having a second home that they needed in order to spend time in both London and their constituencies.
“To get round the new system – and not to lose out financially – some MPs decided to let the homes they owned in London while renting another property and claiming up to £22,920 per year from Ipsa,” said The Times.
Landlord MPs
The Independent reported that 15 Conservatives and two Labour lawmakers were making cash as “landlord MPs”.
The group include Tory former attorney general Geoffrey Cox. The Mirror revealed earlier this week that Cox “rakes in” around £1,000 a month by renting out a property in Battersea while claiming £1,900 to rent another property in the capital.
Cox is also currently “facing scrutiny over the £1m a year he earns as a lawyer”, said The Times. The row has been fuelled by suggestions that he used his parliamentary office while performing duties attached to his second job.
The five current ministers who have also claimed for rent while letting out London homes include International Trade Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan, Defence Secretary Ben Wallace and Foreign Office Minister James Cleverly.
Trevelyan “has claimed £106,000 in expenses” since 2016, according to The Independent, while Wallace and Cleverly claimed more than “£110,000 in taxpayer-funded rent” and “£71,000 in expenses” respectively.
Prisons minister Victoria Atkins and junior Treasury minister John Glen are reported to have used the loophole too.
Other Conservative MPs to have benefited from the scheme include former trade minister Liam Fox, former media minister John Whittingdale, Philip Davies, Robert Goodwill, Laurence Robertson, Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, Anne Marie Morris and Greg Knight.
Labour MPs Geraint Davies and Clive Betts have claimed £67,000 and £44,000 respectively “in taxpayer funding to rent a home”, said the paper.
But Tory backbencher Damian Collins “has the single largest rent expenses submission, claiming just over £148,000” over the past five years.
‘Virtue-signalling’
Alistair Graham, former chair of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, is leading calls for the loophole to be closed.
“It may be within the rules, but it’s quite wrong for MPs to use the public purse in this way,” he told The Independent. “MPs have a duty to claim only public funds that are necessary.
“If there’s an opportunity to end the loophole allowing them to do this, then we must take it. There is a growing feeling that the rules must change.”
Some critics have suggested effectively “means-testing” MPs before deciding whether they should be able to claim taxpayer funds to pay their London rent. However, an Ipsa spokesperson said the “view has not changed that an MP’s personal financial situation is not a relevant ‘test’ for whether they should receive support”.
“We do not want to judge an MP’s private arrangements and whether or not they should live in a property they own,” the spokesperson added.
“Our concern is to ensure that MPs have the appropriate support they need to carry out their parliamentary roles, including suitable accommodation in two locations.”
Despite the regulator’s defence of the system, some MPs remain unconvinced.
“You could not invent a more stupid system,” an unnamed Tory MP told The Times. “It’s inconvenient for MPs, it’s expensive for the taxpayer and makes no sense. It’s virtue-signalling.”
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.
Sign up to our 10 Things You Need to Know Today newsletter
A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
-
Will Rishi Sunak's green wedge issue win over the public?
Today's Big Question The PM draws dividing line with Labour on net zero ahead of the next general election
By Sorcha Bradley Published
-
Industry backlash as Sunak set to water down green pledges
Speed Read Automotive and energy bosses look for clarity after PM backs away from UK net zero goal
By Arion McNicoll Published
-
October by-elections: what's at stake for Labour, Lib Dems and Tories
Parties will contest two former safe Tory seats on 19 October, putting pressure on Rishi Sunak
By Harriet Marsden Published
-
'If Starmer seeks advice from Macron then God help Britain'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week Staff Published
-
Liz Truss and the battle for the Tory grassroots
Talking Point Former PM's speech stirs talk of a comeback but prompts 'furious response from some colleagues'
By Chas Newkey-Burden Published
-
Would Keir Starmer get a better Brexit deal?
Today's big question Labour leader must overcome fact that European capitals 'consider Brexit yesterday's problem'
By Chas Newkey-Burden Published
-
'The Tories are getting working-class conservatives wrong'
Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week Staff Published
-
Jobs for the boys: does the UK need a minister for men?
Conservative MP calls for dedicated cabinet role to combat 'crisis' in men's mental health and education
By Harriet Marsden Published