The Premier League has unveiled a new look for next season as it prepares for life without a headline sponsor.
The competition's current deal with Barclays, worth £40m a season, finishes at the end of the season and from the next, it will "rely on alternative sponsorship elements", reports The Guardian. The new-look branding will "be at the vanguard of a new phase of positioning by the organisation", it adds.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Without a main sponsor, the Premier League hopes to establish itself as a brand in its own right - and was willing to reject a £45m-a-year offer from drinks brand Diageo.
"The decision to have no lead sponsor also makes it easier for the Premier League to communicate to their global audience," says the Mail. "The move reflects the organisation's desire to mirror major American sports leagues like the NBA and NFL in presenting a 'clean' brand."
It is the first change to the league's branding since 2007 and the timing is fitting, says the Guardian. The league table already has an "unfamiliar look", with Leicester and Tottenham Hotspur at the top, and the logos add "another new sheen" to the competition's changing image.
Although the crowned lion, present on the crest since the Premier League was formed in 1992, remains central to the design, the badge "marks a considerable departure from the current emblem", claims the Guardian.
The logos, from agency DesignStudio, feature only the head of the lion. The Mail describes it as a "fresh new design [that] includes a modern take on the lion icon" but not everyone agrees. The Daily Telegraph claims "it looks very similar to the old visual identity", while, unsurprisingly, there was widespread mockery on Twitter.
-
Schools: The return of a dreaded fitness testFeature Donald Trump is bringing the Presidential Fitness Test back to classrooms nationwide
-
An insatiable hunger for proteinFeature Americans can't get enough of the macronutrient. But how much do we really need?
-
Health: Will medical science survive RFK Jr.?Feature Robert F. Kennedy Jr. scrapped $500 million in mRNA vaccine research contracts
-
Trump orders NFL team to change name, or elseSpeed Read The president wants the Washington Commanders to change its name back to the 'Redskins'
-
Why is the NFL considering banning the 'tush push' play?Today's Big Question The play is widely used by the Philadelphia Eagles, to other teams' chagrin
-
How do new stadiums affect football clubs?In the Spotlight Everton's decision to move its men's team out of Goodison Park could be a catalyst for vital change, but there are cautionary tales too
-
Liverpool's Anfield redemption: how did they do it?Talking Point Arne Slot's blueprint and standout player performances guide the Reds to record 20th league title
-
Where are all the English football managers?Talking Point Eddie Howe's Carabao Cup success underlines absence of homegrown coaching talent in the Premier League
-
New Trafford: can it fix Manchester United's footballing problems?Talking Point Plan for £2 billion stadium despite staff job losses and lack of success on the pitch
-
Eagles trounce Chiefs in Super Bowl LIXspeed read The Philadelphia Eagles beat the Kansas City Chiefs 40-22
-
After Tua injury, can NFL make progress on concussions?Today's Big Question Dolphins QB faces calls to retire
