On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Fisher v. University of Texas, in which a white female Texan, Abigail Fisher, sued the University of Texas, claiming she wasn't admitted in 2008 because of affirmative action — UT uses race as one factor in accepting a quarter of incoming students (the other three-quarters are automatically accepted based on academic performance in Texas high schools). This is the second time the Supreme Court has heard the case, and based on the comments from the justices, it appears that a majority is ready to find the UT admissions system — and all affirmative action at U.S. colleges and universities — unconstitutional.
One set of remarks "drew muted gasps in the courtroom," The New York Times reports. University of Texas lawyer Gregory G. Garre had just finished arguing that the black population at "selective" schools "plummeted" after affirmative action was ended, when Justice Antonin Scalia stepped in, according to a court transcript:
Garre responded that "this court heard and rejected that argument, with respect, Justice Scalia." He added that, "frankly, I don't think the solution to the problems with student body diversity can be to set up a system in which not only are minorities going to separate schools, they're going to inferior schools." The key vote in the case will be, as he often is, Justice Anthony Kennedy, who has never voted in favor of affirmative action.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
The Supreme Court does not allow cameras at oral arguments, but audio of Scalia's comments will be released on Friday, legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin noted on CNN after the transcript was released. Scalia was citing an amicus brief filed in the case, he added, but "he has really, almost intentionally, become the 'get off my lawn' justice." You can watch that piece of legal analysis below. Peter Weber
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.