Supreme Court looks hesitant to embrace Biden's vaccine plan but open to rule for health care workers
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday appeared skeptical of President Biden's broad vaccination-or-testing requirement for the nation's large employers, reports The Washington Post, thus "casting doubt" on the president's "most ambitious plan to fight the pandemic." The justices did, however, seem more likely to back to a separate requirement that "health care workers at facilities that receive federal money be vaccinated," adds The New York Times.
The latter regulation was the subject of the second argument heard by the court on Friday.
The justices' decision on both matters could come quickly, considering they are mulling over "emergency petitions to either allow the regulations to go into effect or stop them," per the Post.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
When it came to the large employer mandate, the court's conservative majority was more inclined to believe states or Congress should regulate such decisions rather than the federal government, per the Times. They were also concerned Biden's requirement was too broad; for instance, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett asked if OSHA could have instead drafted a "more targeted" initiative based on workplace conditions, per the Post.
The three liberal justices, however, "expressed disbelief" that anyone would try to block Biden's policy while "the pandemic continues to rage," writes the Post.
"We know the best way to prevent spread is for people to get vaccinated," said Justice Elena Kagan. "This is the policy that is most geared to stopping all this."
The administration's rule, which was supposed to go into effect on Jan. 4, mandates employers with over 100 employees require vaccination or weekly testing as a condition of employment. OSHA pushed back the date in response to legal challenges.
Regarding a separate policy for health care workers, justices felt that "in keeping with other kinds of federal oversight," as well as broadly supported by the medical community, per the Times.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Brigid Kennedy worked at The Week from 2021 to 2023 as a staff writer, junior editor and then story editor, with an interest in U.S. politics, the economy and the music industry.
-
Today's political cartoons - September 7, 2024
Cartoons Saturday's cartoons - football widows, meddling kids, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Smoking ban: the return of the nanny state?
Talking Point Starmer's plan to revive Sunak-era war on tobacco has struck an unsettling chord even with some non-smokers
By The Week UK Published
-
Crossword: September 7, 2024
The Week's daily crossword puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
Who will win the 2024 presidential election?
In Depth Election year is here. Who are pollsters and experts predicting to win the White House?
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Harris, Biden campaign together at union rally
Speed Read The sitting president and Democratic presidential nominee joined forces in battleground state Pennsylvania
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
'The federal government's response to the latest surge has been tepid at best'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Trump hit with revised charges, cemetery complaint
Speed Read The indictment updates reflect a recent Supreme Court decision about presidential immunity
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
A brief history of third parties in the US
In Depth Though none of America's third parties have won a presidential election, they have nonetheless had a large impact on the country's politics
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
North Korea to begin admitting foreign tourists (again)
Under the Radar For the first time in five years, the isolated dictatorship is inviting large groups to visit the city of Samjiyon — and possibly beyond
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
'Declines haven't happened in most places'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
What will Joe Biden's legacy be?
Today's Big Question History is likely to be kind to outgoing president, but his time in office could still be defined by what happens in November election
By The Week UK Published