Supreme Court looks hesitant to embrace Biden's vaccine plan but open to rule for health care workers


The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday appeared skeptical of President Biden's broad vaccination-or-testing requirement for the nation's large employers, reports The Washington Post, thus "casting doubt" on the president's "most ambitious plan to fight the pandemic." The justices did, however, seem more likely to back to a separate requirement that "health care workers at facilities that receive federal money be vaccinated," adds The New York Times.
The latter regulation was the subject of the second argument heard by the court on Friday.
The justices' decision on both matters could come quickly, considering they are mulling over "emergency petitions to either allow the regulations to go into effect or stop them," per the Post.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
When it came to the large employer mandate, the court's conservative majority was more inclined to believe states or Congress should regulate such decisions rather than the federal government, per the Times. They were also concerned Biden's requirement was too broad; for instance, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett asked if OSHA could have instead drafted a "more targeted" initiative based on workplace conditions, per the Post.
The three liberal justices, however, "expressed disbelief" that anyone would try to block Biden's policy while "the pandemic continues to rage," writes the Post.
"We know the best way to prevent spread is for people to get vaccinated," said Justice Elena Kagan. "This is the policy that is most geared to stopping all this."
The administration's rule, which was supposed to go into effect on Jan. 4, mandates employers with over 100 employees require vaccination or weekly testing as a condition of employment. OSHA pushed back the date in response to legal challenges.
Regarding a separate policy for health care workers, justices felt that "in keeping with other kinds of federal oversight," as well as broadly supported by the medical community, per the Times.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Brigid Kennedy worked at The Week from 2021 to 2023 as a staff writer, junior editor and then story editor, with an interest in U.S. politics, the economy and the music industry.
-
July 13 editorial cartoons
Cartoons Sunday's political cartoons include new TSA rules, FEMA cuts, and Volodymyr Zelenskyy complimenting Donald Trump's new wardrobe
-
5 weather-beaten cartoons about the Texas floods
Cartoons Artists take on funding cuts, politicizing tragedy, and more
-
What has the Dalai Lama achieved?
The Explainer Tibet’s exiled spiritual leader has just turned 90, and he has been clarifying his reincarnation plans
-
Iran still has enriched uranium, Israeli official says
Speed Read It remains unclear how long it would take Iran to rebuild its nuclear program following US and Israeli attacks
-
Trump U-turns on weapons to Ukraine
Speed Read Unhappy with Putin, Trump decides the US will go back to arming Ukraine against Russia's attacks
-
Ukraine scrambles as Trump cuts weapons deliveries
Speed Read The halting of weapons shipments was driven by Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby, a Ukraine funding skeptic
-
IAEA: Iran could enrich uranium 'within months'
Speed Read The chief United Nations nuclear inspector, Rafael Grossi, says Iran could be enriching uranium again soon
-
One year after mass protests, why are Kenyans taking to the streets again?
today's big question More than 60 protesters died during demonstrations in 2024
-
Iran nukes program set back months, early intel suggests
Speed Read A Pentagon assessment says US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites only set the program back by months, not years. This contradicts President Donald Trump's claim.
-
Trump says Iran and Israel agreed to ceasefire
Speed Read This followed a night of Israeli airstrikes on Tehran and multiple waves of missiles fired by Iran
-
Israel strikes Iran, killing military and nuclear chiefs
Speed Read Israeli officials said the attack was a 'preemptive' strike on Iran's nuclear program