Debate: should British spies be given a ‘licence to kill’?
Government to push through law offering protections to secret agents
Spies working on behalf of the British government may effectively be granted a “licence to kill” under new laws expected to be unveiled this week, according to reports.
Fresh legislation will grant MI5 - among other security branches - the power to sanction its agents to carry out “necessary and proportionate” crimes in the line of duty, The Telegraph says.
Although how far the protection extends will not be known until the legislation is laid before Parliament, an intelligence source told the newspaper there would be “no limit on the type” of offences that an agent could commit.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
So should the UK’s supersleuths be granted life or death powers?
‘A view to kill’: the case for the new law
The latest reports come amid “an ongoing battle over the legal limits of what agents in the Security Service are permitted to do during covert operations”, The Sun reports
The High Court ruled in December that spies operating on behalf of MI5 can kill in the line of duty without being prosecuted if they are able to persuade authorities that it was done in the public interest.
In the 3-2 majority ruling, Lord Justice Singh of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal said the spy agency has “an implied power” under the Security Service Act 1989 to engage in criminal activity.
James Eadie QC, representing the government, had argued that it would be “impossible” for MI5 to operate without covert sources going undercover in terrorist or other extremist groups, the Daily Mail reports. As the paper notes, maintaining their cover could require agents to “commit murder, kidnap, torture or carry out other serious and violent crimes”.
The tribunal agreed that banning MI5 from operating agents in criminal organisations “would strike at the core activities of the Security Service”. A Home Office spokesperson added that the “use of covert agents” was “an essential tool for MI5 as it carries out its job of keeping the country safe”.
The government now “wants to ensure the implied power is turned into the legal protection the security service says it needs for undercover missions”, according to the Daily Star.
The Telegraph reports that new legislation will “create a legal framework to authorise crime by agents acting on behalf of a variety of public organisations which conduct covert investigations”, effectively bypassing the need for further court cases.
Downing Street is also aiming to “help bring all public authorities which make use of undercover sources under the same statutory framework”, the paper adds.
‘Die another day’: the case against the powers
These sorts of protections have been the subject of fierce debate for decades in the UK.
In the wake of the High Court ruling last year, campaign groups including Privacy International, Reprieve, the Committee on the Administration of Justice and the Pat Finucane Centre said the decision “went against British law and the European Convention on Human Rights”, The National reports.
Maya Foa, director of legal charity Reprieve, pointed out that one of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal judges had said the case set “a dangerous precedent”.
“Our security services play a vital role in keeping this country safe, but history has shown us time and again the need for proper oversight and common sense limits on what agents can do in the public’s name,” said Foa.
Delivering the divided ruling, Lord Justice Singh also sounded a note of warning. The existing protections do “not mean that [MI5] has any power to confer immunity from liability under either the criminal law or the civil law… on either its own officers or on agents handled by them”.
Spies working for MI6 - Britain’s foreign intelligence service - are also protected under Section 7 of the Intelligence Services Act 1994, which offers immunity to agents involved in bugging, bribery, murder, kidnap and torture as long as their actions have been authorised in writing by a secretary of state.
That protection - which is likely to be extended by the expected new legislation - came under “intense scrutiny” during a Scotland Yard investigation launched in 2012 into secret rendition operations that MI6 ran in cooperation with Muammar Gaddafi’s regime in 2004, according to The Guardian.
When asked which offences might be covered by the new law, a source told The Telegraph that “all covert human intelligence complies with [the European Convention on Human Rights] and is necessary and proportionate”.
MI5 has previously refused to say which crimes could be committed under its internal guidelines, known as the “third direction”, claiming that to do so could mean undercover operations were “seriously frustrated”.
But the paper warns that this silence will add to human rights groups’ fears that “the policy may be used to authorise offences as serious as killing on British soil”.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Today's political cartoons - November 2, 2024
Cartoons Saturday's cartoons - anti-fascism, early voter turnout, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Geoff Capes obituary: shot-putter who became the World’s Strongest Man
In the Spotlight The 'mighty figure' was a two-time Commonwealth Champion and world-record holder
By The Week UK Published
-
Israel attacks Iran: a 'limited' retaliation
Talking Point Iran's humiliated leaders must decide how to respond to Netanyahu's measured strike
By The Week UK Published
-
China’s ‘breathtaking’ infiltration of UK economy: an existential threat?
Talking Point New report suggests Beijing is exerting political and economic influence on Westminster
By The Week Staff Published
-
China urges calm as US tracks suspected Chinese surveillance balloon
Speed Read High-altitude spy balloon seen over US nuclear missile facility in Montana
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Was Richard Whiteley an MI5 spy?
In Depth 'Countdown host helped send me to prison in the 1970s,' claims Royle Family star Ricky Tomlinson
By The Week Staff Published
-
MI5 told to recruit more middle-aged mums
Speed Read Women are more 'intuitive' says intelligence report, but Ukip MEP says women should 'stick to changing nappies'
By The Week Staff Published
-
What happened to Alexander Litvinenko?
In Depth Sergei Skripal’s apparent poisoning has drawn comparisons with 2006 poisoning of other exiled former Russian spy
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Lee Rigby’s life ‘could have been saved’: MI5 needs to up its game
In Depth Public have a right to expect MI5 to properly audit procedures and learn from their mistakes quickly
By Crispin Black Published
-
Is MI5 planning dirty tricks to stop Scottish independence?
In Depth Is Margo MacDonald being paranoid – or just preparing excuses for the inevitable referendum defeat?
By Crispin Black Published