Fact check: the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine’s effectiveness in older people
New data suggests jab may reduce Covid transmissions by 67%

Suggestions that the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine may not be effective on older patients have been dealt a further blow after new data suggests that it eliminates the most serious form of Covid and may have a “substantial impact” on Covid transmission as well as symptoms.
Research by the University of Oxford, published in a pre-print report with The Lancet, found that the jab showed a 67% reduction in positive Covid-19 tests in those who had been vaccinated. And a “single dose eliminates severe illness among those who contract the virus”, The Times reports.
The study throws more doubt on the German health ministry’s decision to advise against giving the vaccine to over-65s, a plan that goes against the recommendations of the European Medicines Agency (EMA).
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What has Germany said?
A statement by the Standing Vaccine Commission at the Robert Koch Institute, Germany’s main public health agency, said there were “insufficient data currently available to ascertain how effective the vaccination is above 65 years”.
The German decision results from the relatively small number of over-65s involved in the trial. AstraZeneca chief executive Pascal Soirot told La Repubblica this week that the initial trial group was younger because “it was not ethical to vaccinate old people until they had enough safety data”.
Soirot added: “The data is showing a good level of antibodies in elderly, as you see in younger people”.
What does that mean for the UK?
The trials of the vaccine “did recruit fewer elderly people overall”, writes the BBC’s health editor Michelle Roberts. However, “the scientists who ran the trials have always been upfront about this” and “say there is other evidence to suggest the vaccine will work well in older adults”.
“Studies show the over 65s have strong immune responses to the vaccine”, she adds. “After receiving the shots their blood has plenty of the required antibodies that can fight coronavirus.”
The new research published in The Lancet found that a single dose of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine is 76% effective from day 22 to day 90 after the jab. The findings “support the government’s strategy that rolling out first doses - with a second dose after three months - is effective at reducing disease”, Sky News says.
Oxford University said earlier this month that there was “no basis” for reports in the German media questioning the vaccine’s efficacy, adding that their data has already been “released transparently”. AstraZeneca also reiterated the university’s denial, describing the claims as “completely incorrect”.
AstraZeneca told German broadcaster Deutsche Welle: “In November, we published data in The Lancet demonstrating that older adults showed strong immune responses to the vaccine, with 100% of older adults generating spike-specific antibodies after the second dose.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Holden Frith is The Week’s digital director. He also makes regular appearances on “The Week Unwrapped”, speaking about subjects as diverse as vaccine development and bionic bomb-sniffing locusts. He joined The Week in 2013, spending five years editing the magazine’s website. Before that, he was deputy digital editor at The Sunday Times. He has also been TheTimes.co.uk’s technology editor and the launch editor of Wired magazine’s UK website. Holden has worked in journalism for nearly two decades, having started his professional career while completing an English literature degree at Cambridge University. He followed that with a master’s degree in journalism from Northwestern University in Chicago. A keen photographer, he also writes travel features whenever he gets the chance.
-
Book reviews: 'Girl on Girl: How Pop Culture Turned a Generation of Women Against Themselves' and 'Notes to John'
Feature The aughts' toxic pop culture and Joan Didion's most private pages
-
The FDA plans to embrace AI agencywide
In the Spotlight Rumors are swirling about a bespoke AI chatbot being developed for the FDA by OpenAI
-
Digital consent: Law targets deepfake and revenge porn
Feature The Senate has passed a new bill that will make it a crime to share explicit AI-generated images of minors and adults without consent
-
RFK Jr.: A new plan for sabotaging vaccines
Feature The Health Secretary announced changes to vaccine testing and asks Americans to 'do your own research'
-
Unraveling autism: RFK Jr.'s vow to find a root cause
Feature RFK Jr. has vowed to find the root cause of the 'autism epidemic' in months. Scientists have doubts.
-
The sneaking rise of whooping cough
Under the Radar The measles outbreak isn't the only one to worry about
-
Five years on: How Covid changed everything
Feature We seem to have collectively forgotten Covid’s horrors, but they have completely reshaped politics
-
RFK Jr. offers alternative remedies as measles spreads
Speed Read Health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. makes unsupported claims about containing the spread as vaccine skepticism grows
-
How close are we to a norovirus vaccine?
Today's Big Question A new Moderna trial raises hopes of vanquishing a stomach bug that sickens millions a year
-
HMPV is spreading in China but there's no need to worry
The Explainer Respiratory illness is common in winter
-
Marty Makary: the medical contrarian who will lead the FDA
In the Spotlight What Johns Hopkins surgeon and commentator Marty Makary will bring to the FDA