PM's TV absence 'unacceptable' - but why Farage and not Green leader?
Miliband, Clegg and Farage find an issue they’re agreed on: but shouldn't they be backing Natalie?
EDITOR'S UPDATE, 12.20pm, Wed 14 Jan: Since this article was posted, Green Party leader Natalie Bennett has written to Miliband, Clegg and Farage urging them to contact the broadcasters to say they are open to the Greens being included in the TV debates. If they did so, she argues, "it would be hard for the Prime Minister to raise any new concerns, and this therefore gives the best chance of ensuring that the proposed leaders' debates can go ahead".
Ed Miliband, Nick Clegg and Nigel Farage are ganging up on the Prime Minister, saying it would be "unacceptable" for him to refuse to appear in the party leaders’ TV debates before the general election. If he’s still refusing to join in when the debates take place in April, an “empty podium” should be provided in case he has “a last-minute change of heart”.
Cameron is using Ofcom’s decision not to invite the Green Party as his excuse for not taking part, but it’s hardly a secret that, on the advice of his election strategist Lynton Crosby, he’s trying to avoid debating with Farage on Europe and immigration.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
As Farage told Radio 4’s Today programme this morning: “In 2010, David Cameron did very badly in these debates and he was seen as the loser. This week, he launched six main priorities for the Conservative election campaign and he has completely ignored the issues of Europe and immigration. I feel very strongly he would rather not debate these issues with me on national television.”
The row has managed to unite Miliband, Clegg and Farage for the first time against Cameron, who is isolated. In identical letters, they have written to the PM saying:
"It would be unacceptable if the political self-interest of one party leader were to deny the public the opportunity to see their leaders debate in public.
"Therefore, if you are unwilling to reconsider, the three party leaders who have committed to participate will ask the broadcasters to press ahead with the debates and provide an empty podium should you have a last-minute change of heart.
"These debates are not the property of the politicians and I do not believe the public will accept lightly the prospect of any politician seeking to block them."
Downing Street this morning reiterated that Cameron will take part only if the Green Party is included.
Danny Alexander, the Lib Dem Chief Secretary to the Treasury, told the Today programme that people want to see their leaders debating with each other and that if David Cameron wants “to put the kibosh” on the debates then “he should pay a high political price”.
It is understood the broadcasting rules on impartiality during election campaigns would not prevent the TV debates going ahead without the Prime Minister’s presence, as long as his views are “represented”. No one is yet sure how that would be achieved – but then no one really believes Cameron can keep up his brinkmanship.
As the BBC’s assistant political editor Norman Smith tweeted: “Broadcasters still ‘determined’ TV debates should go ahead. ‘No-one is near talking about empty-chairing TV debates,’ says source familiar with negotiations.”
A ComRes poll for ITV News suggests Miliband, Clegg and Farage have the public on their side in this fight: 55 per cent believed the PM was being cowardly and 50 per cent thought he was using the Green Party as an excuse for ducking the debates.
On the other hand, the three leaders could gang up on Ofcom instead of Cameron and insist that the Greens are invited. The same Com Res poll found that 50 per cent thought the Green Party should be involved.
Which brings me to another thought: the Greens have one MP. Ukip have two, but on their current showing in the opinion polls - flatlining at 16 per cent - the Electoral Calculus projection is that they will end up with only one MP after 7 May (presumably Douglas Carswell).
If Farage is allowed take part, then so should Natalie Bennett of the Greens.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Last hopes for justice for UK's nuclear test veterans
Under the Radar Thousands of ex-service personnel say their lives have been blighted by aggressive cancers and genetic mutations
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Donald Trump wreck the Brexit deal?
Today's Big Question President-elect's victory could help UK's reset with the EU, but a free-trade agreement with the US to dodge his threatened tariffs could hinder it
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is the next Tory leader up against?
Today's Big Question Kemi Badenoch or Robert Jenrick will have to unify warring factions and win back disillusioned voters – without alienating the centre ground
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is Lammy hoping to achieve in China?
Today's Big Question Foreign secretary heads to Beijing as Labour seeks cooperation on global challenges and courts opportunities for trade and investment
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What next for Reform UK?
In the Spotlight Farage says party should learn from the Lib Dems in drumming up local support
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
Is Britain about to 'boil over'?
Today's Big Question A message shared across far-right groups listed more than 30 potential targets for violence in the UK today
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
UK's Starmer slams 'far-right thuggery' at riots
Speed Read The anti-immigrant violence was spurred by false rumors that the suspect in the Southport knife attack was an immigrant
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published