Congress is angry over flights at a Washington, DC, airport
Ronald Reagan National Airport is taking on more planes than it can handle — and causing a congressional feud
![Photo collage of the US Capitol building with many planes taking off behind it, fanning out in a symmetrical formation, similar to an airshow](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/XLxAzMx9USvXuGpHEC3ZUV-415-80.jpg)
There is a fight brewing on Capitol Hill, but it may not be the one you're expecting. Members of Congress have reached a boiling point — over an airport. Specifically, a group of politicians are feuding over the recent allowance of additional long-distance flights at Washington, D.C.'s Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.
Despite being significantly smaller than Washington's Dulles International Airport, Reagan National is the busiest airport in the nation's capital, and "broke its all-time passenger traffic record with 25.5 million passengers in 2023," said the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority. This comes out to nearly one flight at the airport every minute. Despite its heavy traffic, Reagan National is typically a short-haul airport, with just 11 available routes being longer than 1,250 miles. However, Congress has now made a major change that is irking some senators.
The new plan is part of the recently passed FAA reauthorization bill, which was pushed through both chambers of Congress in mid-May. The reauthorization calls for five additional round-trip flights to be added to Reagan National, which could potentially be used for long-haul journeys. But some in Congress are concerned these new flights will push an already stretched airport to the brink.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
![https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516-320-80.jpg)
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Why are more flights being added?
Federal regulators and the U.S. Department of Transportation hope that adding more flight slots to Reagan National "will benefit passengers, as increasing seat availability to high-demand destinations such as Los Angeles and San Francisco should help to lower the airport's notoriously high ticket prices," said Simple Flying. It is also predicted that the additional slots could create more competition for United Airlines, which uses nearby Dulles as a major hub.
However, there is another reason that lawmakers were eager to add more slots to Reagan National: it's the airport they use. The airport is "easily accessible by car and public transit, and its proximity to Capitol Hill makes it a favorite of lawmakers," said Business Insider. As such, the "allure of adding long-haul flights to [Reagan National] is impossible to resist." And this is one of the major reasons for the controversy.
Why is the bill's passage causing anger in Congress?
The addition of more flights is raising alarm bells among some in Congress who feel that it will cause safety concerns. These concerns were heightened in mid-April when a JetBlue flight nearly collided with a Southwest jet on a Reagan National runway. In particular, the additions were blasted by lawmakers from Washington, D.C.'s two states, Maryland and Virginia, as possible disasters waiting to happen.
The reauthorization bill "[ignores] the flashing red warning light of the recent near collision of two aircraft at DCA and jam even more flights onto the busiest runway in America," Sens. Ben Cardin (D-Md.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Mark R. Warner (D-Va.) and Tim Kaine (D-Va.) said in a joint statement when the bill was initially proposed. They "understand the desire of senators to shorten their commutes home, but this proposal would benefit few while impacting many, first and foremost in safety but also in delays and in reducing the economic competitiveness of smaller destinations." The safety of passengers "should be a higher priority than the convenience of a few lawmakers who want direct flights home from their preferred airport."
While some in Congress have accused lawmakers of wanting the additional flights for their own convenience, there was pushback over this notion from some on Capitol Hill. The four senators were "cloaking their arguments in public safety, but I don't think it's a safety argument. I think they like monopoly," Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said to CNN. Texas lawmakers were "being discriminated against" because there are no direct flights to San Antonio, Cornyn said.
Even as the reauthorization has now passed, the federal government is "concerned about the pressure that [added flights] could put on the system" of Reagan National, Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said, per Politico. However, the bill "will help continue the FAA's work to safely operate the world’s most complex airspace," he said on X.
Despite this, Virginia politicians from both chambers don't seem to be reassured about the airport. The provision of the additional flights "was jammed through by senators and airlines who are putting their own interest above the safety of travelers," Rep. Bobby Scott (D-Va.) said in a press release after the reauthorization passed.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Justin Klawans has worked as a staff writer at The Week since 2022. He began his career covering local news before joining Newsweek as a breaking news reporter, where he wrote about politics, national and global affairs, business, crime, sports, film, television and other Hollywood news. Justin has also freelanced for outlets including Collider and United Press International.
-
Charlotte Dujardin and equestrianism's dark side
In the Spotlight Olympic gold medallist and dressage star's suspension over horse whipping brings abuse in horse sports back into the spotlight
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Why Roman epic Those About to Die has split the critics
Talking Point Sword and sandals miniseries starring Anthony Hopkins puts spectacle above story
By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK Published
-
Why is China stockpiling resources?
The Explainer The superpower has been amassing huge reserves of commodities at great cost despite its economic downturn
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
Well-heeled: Six-figure guard dogs are the new security system for the wealthy
Under the Radar Many of these dogs can cost upwards of $150,000
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Canada is facing an uphill battle against car theft
Under the Radar More than 200 stolen vehicles from Canada are detected every week
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
A not-so-quiet place: Why is no one using headphones in public anymore?
Under the Radar People are increasingly comfortable with both speakerphone and watching videos (very) out loud
By Anya Jaremko-Greenwold, The Week US Published
-
The only TV show you need to watch this election year
The Week Recommends Amazon Prime's 'The Boys' relishes its ripped-from-the-headlines ultraviolence
By David Faris Published
-
Dog attacks are on the rise
Under the Radar The number of fatal dog attacks has more than doubled in the past decade, according to the CDC
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Boysober: the rebranding of female celibacy
Under the Radar Voluntarily abstaining from sex is gaining traction as a feminist choice amid erosion of reproductive rights and dating app fatigue
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Why Japan is clamping down on host clubs
Under The Radar Women flock to bars for attention from male hosts but 'slippery' payment systems leads to huge debts
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Are young people falling out of love with music?
Under the Radar Children are listening to more music than ever, but pinning identity to genres is an increasingly alien notion
By Rebecca Messina, The Week UK Published