Why Nigel Farage has accepted Clegg's EU debate challenge
Ukip leader hopes it will lead to him being included in televised leaders' debates at 2015 general election
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
NIGEL FARAGE today stepped up his demand to be included in the national televised party leaders’ debates at the 2015 general election after accepting a challenge from Nick Clegg, the deputy Prime Minister, to debate Ukip’s policy of pulling Britain out of Europe.
Currently, the argument against Farage being invited to join Cameron, Miliband and Clegg in the eve-of-election TV debates next year is very simple: without any Westminster seats, Ukip is not a major party and need not be invited to the top table. All Farage has is opinion polls suggesting more people – possibly twice as many - will vote for Ukip than for the Lib Dems at the 2015 election.
However, he also has high hopes of Ukip doing very well in the European elections this May: a recent YouGov poll suggests Ukip could end up with 23 MEPs in Brussels, short of Labour's predicted 28, but way ahead of the Tories (15 seats predicted, down by 11) and the Lib Dems (predicted to lose all their 11 seats). It is this prospect which he believes could turn the tables.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Acknowledging that the other leaders did not want him in the 2015 debates, Farage said this morning: “It depends on Ukip’s progress – there’s 91 days to the European elections. If Ukip can achieve what I believe is possible – that we win a national election – how can they possibly keep us out of the leaders’ debates next year?"
Farage was speaking on LBC Radio, where he announced he was accepting Clegg's challenge, issued on the same station yesterday, to debate Europe.
One caller to LBC this morning said Farage should have held out for a "cast iron" written guarantee of a place in the 2015 leaders’ debates before accepting the challenge.
Farage responded: "I thought about that. [But] if this works and engages a large number of people in the European elections, it makes it more likely that next year, for the general election, everyone will be involved. I see this as a step towards the same thing happening on a bigger scale next year.”
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Explaining why he had agreed to debate Clegg, Farage said: “I thought about this overnight. The reason I got into politics – I was working in the City – was because I felt on this great question of who governs our country, Parliament or the institutions of Brussels, we weren’t having a proper debate. So the answer is yes. I can hardly wait.”
It is not clear when exactly the LBC debate will take place or whether, given the national interest, it might be moved elsewhere (BBC Newsnight has already offered its studio, anytime) or indeed whether Ed Miliband might be persuaded to join in (according to one report this morning, the Labour leader has not ruled it out).
Whatever happens, David Cameron is highly unlikely to agree to take part. Farage said Downing Street had already started briefing that Cameron was too busy running the country to debate the EU with the Ukip leader. He said: “I bet you a £5 they won’t.”
If it it is just Clegg and Farage, which seems most likely, who stands to gain?
Clegg knows he has nothing to lose – he is an unequivocal pro-European facing a whitewash in the May election. And he's probably hoping Farage will fall flat on his face.
On the other hand, no one knows better than Clegg what a national debate can do for you – he was the easy winner against Cameron and Gordon Brown in the 2010 general election debates. But then no one knows better how quickly the nation's affection can be withdrawn.
-
The ‘ravenous’ demand for Cornish mineralsUnder the Radar Growing need for critical minerals to power tech has intensified ‘appetite’ for lithium, which could be a ‘huge boon’ for local economy
-
Why are election experts taking Trump’s midterm threats seriously?IN THE SPOTLIGHT As the president muses about polling place deployments and a centralized electoral system aimed at one-party control, lawmakers are taking this administration at its word
-
‘Restaurateurs have become millionaires’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Should the EU and UK join Trump’s board of peace?Today's Big Question After rushing to praise the initiative European leaders are now alarmed
-
How corrupt is the UK?The Explainer Decline in standards ‘risks becoming a defining feature of our political culture’ as Britain falls to lowest ever score on global index
-
How long can Keir Starmer last as Labour leader?Today's Big Question Pathway to a coup ‘still unclear’ even as potential challengers begin manoeuvring into position
-
The high street: Britain’s next political battleground?In the Spotlight Mass closure of shops and influx of organised crime are fuelling voter anger, and offer an opening for Reform UK
-
EU-Mercosur mega trade deal: 25 years in the makingThe Explainer Despite opposition from France and Ireland among others, the ‘significant’ agreement with the South American bloc is set to finally go ahead
-
Who is paying for Europe’s €90bn Ukraine loan?Today’s Big Question Kyiv secures crucial funding but the EU ‘blinked’ at the chance to strike a bold blow against Russia
-
Nigel Farage’s £9mn windfall: will it smooth his path to power?In Depth The record donation has come amidst rumours of collaboration with the Conservatives and allegations of racism in Farage's school days
-
Moscow cheers Trump’s new ‘America First’ strategyspeed read The president’s national security strategy seeks ‘strategic stability’ with Russia