Has Russia's nuclear saber-rattling lost its edge?
Kremlin worries repeated nuke threats have lost their potency


Russia has kept the world from intervening more directly in its war with Ukraine with a simple, hair-raising reminder: It has nuclear weapons. And it is willing to use them if its interests are sufficiently threatened by the West.
It isn't clear the West feels those threats as keenly as it once did. And in the Kremlin, there is recognition that its use of nuclear saber-rattling is "starting to lose its potency," said The Washington Post. Why? Because the United States and other Ukraine allies have repeatedly pushed against Russia's "red lines" — by providing jet fighters to Kyiv, for example — apparently without heightening the risk of a nuclear war. "There is already immunity to such statements," said an anonymous Russian official, "and they don't frighten anyone."
But Vladimir Putin is still making those threats. He warned NATO allies this month that they would be "at war with Russia" if they provide Ukraine with long-range missiles. The threat "sounds different this time," Fred Weir said at The Christian Science Monitor. Putin has come under pressure from Moscow hawks to "restore deterrence" and make Western leaders more cautious about their support for Ukraine. "There is a growing feeling that the West needs some kind of a wake-up call," said Russian newspaper columnist Sergei Strokan.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What did the commentators say?
It's time for the West to "change the way we think about nuclear deterrence," Andriy Zagorodnyuk said at The Guardian. The United States and Europe have proceeded cautiously, worried about "potential nuclear escalation" and triggering a world war. That means the strategy against Russia has prioritized "avoiding escalation, even if this slows down Ukraine's defense efforts." After two years of war, though, a number of experts believe the chances of nuclear war "are practically zero," Zagorodnyuk said. Why? Because the world has been able to "silence Putin's nuclear saber-rattling."
"There should have been a nuclear war by now," Phillips P. O'Brien said at The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists. Despite an incursion into Russian territory, Putin's forces have "not taken any step to even prepare nuclear weapons for use." That's something to celebrate. But it's not time to abandon caution: "The longer a war goes on, the more politically intense and brutal it gets." That makes nuclear escalation "more likely," O'Brien said. One certainty: The world is in uncharted territory. "Many of the assumptions underlying the use of nuclear weapons lie in tatters."
What next?
One snag: A planned test of the country's so-called "Satan II" intercontinental ballistic missile evidently "failed" in late September, said CBS News. Satellite imagery shows a "large crater and remnants of a possible explosion" at the test site in northern Russia.
Putin, meanwhile, is ramping up the rhetoric. On Wednesday he announced that Russia would "adjust its nuclear doctrine," said The New York Times. Russian forces will now be prepared to use nuclear weapons to repel a conventional-weapons attack that is a "critical threat to our sovereignty," Putin said. That's a "clear reference" to Ukraine's recent cross-border incursion into Russian territory. He signaled, too, that Russia will hold Ukraine's backers as responsible for those incursions as well. Putin's statement "lowers the rhetorical threshold for potential use of nuclear weapons," said one analyst to the Times. The nuclear saber-rattling isn't over.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
Air strikes in the Caribbean: Trump’s murky narco-war
Talking Point Drug cartels ‘don’t follow Marquess of Queensberry Rules’, but US military air strikes on speedboats rely on strained interpretation of ‘invasion’
-
Crossword: September 14, 2025
The Week's daily crossword puzzle
-
Sudoku medium: September 14, 2025
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
-
Kim Jong Un’s triumph: the rise and rise of North Korea’s dictator
In the Spotlight North Korean leader has strengthened ties with Russia and China, and recently revealed his ‘respected child’ to the world
-
‘Peak consumption has become the Holy Grail of the energy debate’
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Why does Donald Trump keep showing up at major sporting events?
Today's Big Question Trump has appeared at the Super Bowl, the Daytona 500 and other events
-
Burkina Faso's misinformation war
Under The Radar The president of the West African country has quickly become the face of a viral, AI-powered propaganda campaign
-
Why are federal judges criticizing SCOTUS?
Today's Big Question Supreme Court issues Trump case rulings 'with little explanation'
-
Why are Trump's health rumors about more than just presidential fitness?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION Extended absences and unexplained bruises have raised concerns about both his well-being and his administration's transparency
-
Can US tourism survive Trump's policies?
Today's Big Question The tourist economy is 'heading in the wrong direction'
-
Can Trump put his tariffs on stronger legal footing?
Today's Big Question Appeals court says 'emergency' tariffs are improper