‘Nuclear plan B’: how the US intends to confront Iran
Mike Pompeo threatens ‘strongest sanctions in history’ and hints of long-term regime change

A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
Thank you for signing up to TheWeek. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.
Mike Pompeo has used his first big speech as US Secretary of State to set out the Trump administration’s ‘Plan B’ for dealing with Iran following its decision to withdraw from the 2015 multilateral nuclear deal.
Speaking at the conservative Heritage Foundation policy group in Washington, the former CIA director said the US would never allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon and would impose the “strongest sanctions in history” to force the regime to submit to its demands.
What will change?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“The sting of sanctions will be painful if the regime does not change its course from the unacceptable and unproductive path it has chosen to one that rejoins the league of nations,” Pompeo said.
Among what Al Jazeera has called an “onerous” list of 12 “basic requirements” the regime must sign up to, Pompeo insisted Iran must stop developing ballistic missiles, release Americans currently held in prisons in the country, and stop support of militant and terrorist groups in the Middle East and beyond.
He also crucially called for a ban on a heavy-water reactor, which is the most basic way to develop nuclear energy, says CNBC.
Is there any incentive for Iran?
While the harsh rhetoric was aimed squarely at leaders in Tehran, he also offered an olive branch to the Iranian people, saying that unlike previous administration, “The United States believe you deserve better”.
Pompeo pointed to the administration’s ongoing nuclear negotiations with North Korea as a model for a new agreement with Iran, with administration officials saying the plan is to assemble a global coalition to pressure Iran into negotiations on “a new security architecture” that goes beyond its nuclear programme.
Will it work?
“It is certainly tough but may be totally unrealistic” says the BBC’s Jonathan Marcus, arguing that “for sanctions to work they must be comprehensive”, but “compelling allies and other countries to abandon trade with Iran risks damaging a whole series of wider diplomatic relationships”.
Despite overtures to the Iranian people and paying lip-service to a continued diplomatic dialogue with the regime “many former officials, foreign diplomats and analysts are sceptical, both of the chances a broader pact can come together, and of the administration's interest in diplomacy with Iran” says CNN.
Is there an ulterior motive?
Many claim the real objective of the White House is to force Iran to pull back from regional activities in Syria and the Yemen, and ultimately push for regime change within Iran.
Trump’s new National Security Adviser John Bolton has previously advocated overthrowing Iran’s government.
Other have warned the new US approach is a hugely destabilising move, with CNN saying that “regardless of the administration's goals, the chances of miscalculation, especially with Israel and Saudi Arabia urging Trump to confront Tehran, are high”.
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.
Sign up to our 10 Things You Need to Know Today newsletter
A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
-
Why New York City was caught off guard by flash flooding
Talking Point Is climate change moving too fast or are city leaders dragging their feet?
By Theara Coleman Published
-
Today's political cartoons - October 2, 2023
Monday's cartoons - Biden's EV plan, the Senate dress code, and more
By The Week Staff Published
-
What is Rep. Matt Gaetz's endgame?
Today's Big Question The MAGA congressman loves to sow chaos, but there might be more to his latest moves than just disruption.
By Rafi Schwartz Published
-
Russian pilot 'tried to shoot down RAF plane'
Speed Read 'Ambiguous' communications triggered the potentially deadly incident in 2022, defence sources say
By Julia O'Driscoll Published
-
Inside the luxury bulletproof train taking Kim Jong Un to Russia
The Explainer The North Korean leader has continued the tradition of train travel established by his father
By Rebekah Evans Published
-
Why do Russians support the Ukraine war?
Today's Big Question A year on from Putin’s invasion, support for the conflict appears to remain high domestically
By The Week Staff Published
-
One year on: how has the world changed since Russia’s invasion?
Today's Big Question After a year of war, Ukraine remains ‘unbowed and unconquered’
By The Week Staff Published
-
Ukraine’s children abducted and ‘re-educated’ by Russia
feature Russian camps ‘brainwash’ thousands of Ukrainian children
By The Week Staff Published
-
Timeline of the Ukraine war
feature Russia invaded Ukraine on 24 February 2022
By Amrita Gill Last updated
-
Is China going to send weapons to help Russia in Ukraine?
Today's Big Question Fears grow in Washington that Beijing may be about to increase its support for Putin
By The Week Staff Published
-
Pervez Musharraf: military dictator who became a valued US ally
feature Divisive army chief worked with President Bush to take on the Taliban after 9/11
By The Week Staff Published