‘Nuclear plan B’: how the US intends to confront Iran
Mike Pompeo threatens ‘strongest sanctions in history’ and hints of long-term regime change
Mike Pompeo has used his first big speech as US Secretary of State to set out the Trump administration’s ‘Plan B’ for dealing with Iran following its decision to withdraw from the 2015 multilateral nuclear deal.
Speaking at the conservative Heritage Foundation policy group in Washington, the former CIA director said the US would never allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon and would impose the “strongest sanctions in history” to force the regime to submit to its demands.
What will change?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“The sting of sanctions will be painful if the regime does not change its course from the unacceptable and unproductive path it has chosen to one that rejoins the league of nations,” Pompeo said.
Among what Al Jazeera has called an “onerous” list of 12 “basic requirements” the regime must sign up to, Pompeo insisted Iran must stop developing ballistic missiles, release Americans currently held in prisons in the country, and stop support of militant and terrorist groups in the Middle East and beyond.
He also crucially called for a ban on a heavy-water reactor, which is the most basic way to develop nuclear energy, says CNBC.
Is there any incentive for Iran?
While the harsh rhetoric was aimed squarely at leaders in Tehran, he also offered an olive branch to the Iranian people, saying that unlike previous administration, “The United States believe you deserve better”.
Pompeo pointed to the administration’s ongoing nuclear negotiations with North Korea as a model for a new agreement with Iran, with administration officials saying the plan is to assemble a global coalition to pressure Iran into negotiations on “a new security architecture” that goes beyond its nuclear programme.
Will it work?
“It is certainly tough but may be totally unrealistic” says the BBC’s Jonathan Marcus, arguing that “for sanctions to work they must be comprehensive”, but “compelling allies and other countries to abandon trade with Iran risks damaging a whole series of wider diplomatic relationships”.
Despite overtures to the Iranian people and paying lip-service to a continued diplomatic dialogue with the regime “many former officials, foreign diplomats and analysts are sceptical, both of the chances a broader pact can come together, and of the administration's interest in diplomacy with Iran” says CNN.
Is there an ulterior motive?
Many claim the real objective of the White House is to force Iran to pull back from regional activities in Syria and the Yemen, and ultimately push for regime change within Iran.
Trump’s new National Security Adviser John Bolton has previously advocated overthrowing Iran’s government.
Other have warned the new US approach is a hugely destabilising move, with CNN saying that “regardless of the administration's goals, the chances of miscalculation, especially with Israel and Saudi Arabia urging Trump to confront Tehran, are high”.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Women take center stage in campaign finale
Speed Read Harris and Trump are trading gender attacks in the final days before the election
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Today's political cartoons - November 1, 2024
Cartoons Friday's cartoons - election on the brain, Bannon emerges, and more
By The Week US Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Has the Taliban banned women from speaking?
Today's Big Question 'Rambling' message about 'bizarre' restriction joins series of recent decrees that amount to silencing of Afghanistan's women
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Cuba's energy crisis
The Explainer Already beset by a host of issues, the island nation is struggling with nationwide blackouts
By Rebekah Evans, The Week UK Published
-
Putin's fixation with shamans
Under the Radar Secretive Russian leader, said to be fascinated with occult and pagan rituals, allegedly asked for blessing over nuclear weapons
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Chimpanzees are dying of human diseases
Under the radar Great apes are vulnerable to human pathogens thanks to genetic similarity, increased contact and no immunity
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Deaths of Jesse Baird and Luke Davies hang over Sydney's Mardi Gras
The Explainer Police officer, the former partner of TV presenter victim, charged with two counts of murder after turning himself in
By Austin Chen, The Week UK Published
-
Quiz of The Week: 24 February - 1 March
Puzzles and Quizzes Have you been paying attention to The Week's news?
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will mounting discontent affect Iran election?
Today's Big Question Low turnout is expected in poll seen as crucial test for Tehran's leadership
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Sweden clears final NATO hurdle with Hungary vote
Speed Read Hungary's parliament overwhelmingly approved Sweden's accession to NATO
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published