Is Russia planning to blow up the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant?
Ukraine warns of tactical sabotage that could cause radioactive disaster and force Kyiv into peace talks

A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
Thank you for signing up to TheWeek. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.
Russia could be planning to blow up Europe’s largest nuclear power plant in a bid to halt the advance of Ukrainian troops and force Kyiv into premature peace talks that favour the Kremlin.
According to Ukrainian intelligence, Russian workers and a military contingent have been told to leave the Zaporizhzhia plant, situated in the occupied city of Enerhodar, by Wednesday – “an ominous sign”, said The New York Times.
On Saturday Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the Ukrainian president, described the threat as “serious”. He claimed that “Russia is technically ready to provoke a local explosion at the plant”, which could cause a radioactive environmental disaster.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What did the papers say?
Ukrainian officials have been “sounding increasingly dire warnings” around the nuclear plant that Russia has occupied since early in the war, reported ABC News.
The plant has been in “continual danger” for months as Russian and Ukrainian troops exchange fire around it, The Washington Post said. But “the chance of a meltdown has increased sharply since the destruction of the Kakhovka dam just downstream”. The catastrophic flood unleashed following the blowing up of the dam at the beginning of June has jeopardised the supply of water needed to cool the plant’s reactors and spent fuel.
“In some ways, it’s a miracle nothing has happened” already, said The New York Times, with parts of two reactors hit by artillery fire “Never before has one of the world’s largest nuclear facilities fallen into the bull’s-eye of a large-scale war,” the paper added.
Last week, Ukraine’s chief of military intelligence, Kyrylo Budanov, claimed that Russia’s plan to sabotage the plant had been “drafted and approved”. He told The New Statesman that Russian troops had rigged the station’s cooling ponds with explosives, which if destroyed could lead to the reactors melting down.
“The situation has never been as severe as now,” he warned.
At the same time, Ukraine has been conducting drills to prepare emergency services with how to deal with a potential radioactive disaster.
Russia’s foreign ministry spokesperson, Maria Zakharova, claimed that Ukrainian radioactive safety drills and the setting up of additional radiation measurement devices in several cities proved that “Kyiv is preparing a false flag” operation, effectively planning to blow up the plant themselves and blame it on Russia. This worry appears to be supported by Ukrainian intelligence reports, which said Russian “personnel remaining at the station were instructed to blame Ukraine in case of any emergencies”.
What next?
The fear among Ukrainian officials is that the Kremlin might blow up the plant “in the event Ukraine achieves a major breakthrough with its counteroffensive in the south, trying to halt the advance of Ukrainian troops by contaminating the area”, said ABC News.
The broadcaster added they also worry Russia might trigger an “incident at the plant in the hope of freezing the war, by pushing a panicked international community to force Kyiv into premature peace negotiations that would favor the Kremlin”.
Despite a ramping up of rhetoric between Ukraine and Russia over the fate of the plant, Western experts have been more measured in their assessment.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has been conducting regular inspections of the reactor units and other areas of the plant. It has not been able to confirm claims the cooling ponds have been mined but said the largest of these still has a stable level of water needed to cool down the reactors.
Taking a lead from the IAEA, the Biden administration has also been more “cautious”, reported Open Democracy. Officials said that they did not believe a threat was imminent but that they were watching “very, very closely”.
“The conventional wisdom is that the Russians know a nuclear incident could carry terrifying, and unknown, consequences and therefore it’s unlikely – though not impossible – that the Russians would intentionally set one off,” said The New York Times.
If a meltdown were to occur, experts speaking to The Washington Post predicted that – because the plant has been shut down for months and is currently not producing energy – it would unlikely to be anywhere near the scale of the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, which blew up when the reactor was in active operation.
The most likely worst-case scenario would be something on the scale of the Fukushima disaster in Japan in 2011, they said. That required a 20km exclusion zone and it was not until six years later that all evacuation orders outside the plant itself were lifted.
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.
Sign up to our 10 Things You Need to Know Today newsletter
A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
-
Why the Roman Empire is suddenly everywhere online
The Explainer It fell more than 1,500 years ago — so why is it dominating social media?
By Justin Klawans Published
-
How climate change is going to change the insurance industry
The Explainer Some regions will soon be 'uninsurable'
By Devika Rao Published
-
TV to watch in October, from 'Loki' to 'The Fall of the House of Usher'
The Explainer Celebrate spooky season with some eerie streaming shows
By Brendan Morrow Published
-
Is Ukraine losing the support of Eastern Europe?
Today's big question Grain dispute between Warsaw and Kyiv could lead to other dominos falling
By Chas Newkey-Burden Published
-
Yevgeny Prigozhin: will ‘predictable’ death of Wagner chief backfire on Putin?
Today's Big Question Analysts say Russian president faces growing danger from advisers and risk of revenge from Wagner fighters
By Chas Newkey-Burden Published
-
Is Belarus the next serious threat to the West?
Today's Big Question President Lukashenko is tightening ties with Russia and China while ‘escalating tensions with Nato’
By Chas Newkey-Burden Published
-
How much is the Russia-Ukraine war costing?
In Depth Kyiv faces $400 billion rebuilding bill and military spending could soon catch up with Russia’s economy
By Richard Windsor Published
-
Why Putin is weaponising grain in the war with Ukraine
Under the Radar Russian president’s use of food as a strategic weapon could prove brutally effective
By The Week Staff Published
-
Ukraine war: who is winning?
feature Kyiv reports some counter-offensive success but progress remains slow
By Sorcha Bradley Published
-
What role is Russia playing in the Niger coup?
Today's Big Question Vladimir Putin will ‘welcome’ chance to expand influence in region, despite no indication he was behind military takeover
By The Week Staff Published
-
Putin skips South Africa summit: will anyone arrest Russian president?
Today's Big Question Moscow has threatened war on any country that upholds international arrest warrant over war crimes in Ukraine
By Harriet Marsden Last updated